Cargando…

Risk perception in fire evacuation behavior revisited: definitions, related concepts, and empirical evidence

Risk perception (RP) is studied in many research disciplines (e.g., safety engineering, psychology, and sociology). Definitions of RP can be broadly divided into expectancy-value and risk-as-feeling approaches. In the present review, RP is seen as the personalization of the risk related to a current...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinateder, Max T, Kuligowski, Erica D, Reneke, Paul A, Peacock, Richard D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5012356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27656350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40038-014-0005-z
_version_ 1782451990819766272
author Kinateder, Max T
Kuligowski, Erica D
Reneke, Paul A
Peacock, Richard D
author_facet Kinateder, Max T
Kuligowski, Erica D
Reneke, Paul A
Peacock, Richard D
author_sort Kinateder, Max T
collection PubMed
description Risk perception (RP) is studied in many research disciplines (e.g., safety engineering, psychology, and sociology). Definitions of RP can be broadly divided into expectancy-value and risk-as-feeling approaches. In the present review, RP is seen as the personalization of the risk related to a current event, such as an ongoing fire emergency; it is influenced by emotions and prone to cognitive biases. We differentiate RP from other related concepts (e.g., situation awareness) and introduce theoretical frameworks relevant to RP in fire evacuation (e.g., Protective Action Decision Model and Heuristic-Systematic approaches). Furthermore, we review studies on RP during evacuation with a focus on the World Trade Center evacuation on September 11, 2001 and present factors modulating RP as well as the relation between perceived risk and protective actions. We summarize the factors that influence perception risk and discuss the direction of these relationships (i.e., positive or negative influence, or inconsequential) and conclude with presenting limitations of this review and an outlook on future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5012356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50123562016-09-19 Risk perception in fire evacuation behavior revisited: definitions, related concepts, and empirical evidence Kinateder, Max T Kuligowski, Erica D Reneke, Paul A Peacock, Richard D Fire Sci Rev Review Risk perception (RP) is studied in many research disciplines (e.g., safety engineering, psychology, and sociology). Definitions of RP can be broadly divided into expectancy-value and risk-as-feeling approaches. In the present review, RP is seen as the personalization of the risk related to a current event, such as an ongoing fire emergency; it is influenced by emotions and prone to cognitive biases. We differentiate RP from other related concepts (e.g., situation awareness) and introduce theoretical frameworks relevant to RP in fire evacuation (e.g., Protective Action Decision Model and Heuristic-Systematic approaches). Furthermore, we review studies on RP during evacuation with a focus on the World Trade Center evacuation on September 11, 2001 and present factors modulating RP as well as the relation between perceived risk and protective actions. We summarize the factors that influence perception risk and discuss the direction of these relationships (i.e., positive or negative influence, or inconsequential) and conclude with presenting limitations of this review and an outlook on future research. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-01-08 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC5012356/ /pubmed/27656350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40038-014-0005-z Text en © Kinateder et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Review
Kinateder, Max T
Kuligowski, Erica D
Reneke, Paul A
Peacock, Richard D
Risk perception in fire evacuation behavior revisited: definitions, related concepts, and empirical evidence
title Risk perception in fire evacuation behavior revisited: definitions, related concepts, and empirical evidence
title_full Risk perception in fire evacuation behavior revisited: definitions, related concepts, and empirical evidence
title_fullStr Risk perception in fire evacuation behavior revisited: definitions, related concepts, and empirical evidence
title_full_unstemmed Risk perception in fire evacuation behavior revisited: definitions, related concepts, and empirical evidence
title_short Risk perception in fire evacuation behavior revisited: definitions, related concepts, and empirical evidence
title_sort risk perception in fire evacuation behavior revisited: definitions, related concepts, and empirical evidence
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5012356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27656350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40038-014-0005-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kinatedermaxt riskperceptioninfireevacuationbehaviorrevisiteddefinitionsrelatedconceptsandempiricalevidence
AT kuligowskiericad riskperceptioninfireevacuationbehaviorrevisiteddefinitionsrelatedconceptsandempiricalevidence
AT renekepaula riskperceptioninfireevacuationbehaviorrevisiteddefinitionsrelatedconceptsandempiricalevidence
AT peacockrichardd riskperceptioninfireevacuationbehaviorrevisiteddefinitionsrelatedconceptsandempiricalevidence