Cargando…

Biomechanical and histological comparison between the cryopreserved and the lyophilized Gracilis tendon allograft for MPFL reconstruction, a cadaveric experimental study

BACKGROUND: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main restrictor of lateral shifting of the patella, contributing by 60 % in the first 20° flexion of the knee. MPFL reconstruction has been performed in order to restore the stability of the patella with good results.Lyophilized Gracilis tendo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Negrín, Roberto, Duboy, Jaime, Olavarría, Fernando, Wainer, Mauricio, Jimenez, Horacio, Las Heras, Facundo, Reyes, Nicolas, Godoy, Hugo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27600522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-016-0056-2
_version_ 1782452083946946560
author Negrín, Roberto
Duboy, Jaime
Olavarría, Fernando
Wainer, Mauricio
Jimenez, Horacio
Las Heras, Facundo
Reyes, Nicolas
Godoy, Hugo
author_facet Negrín, Roberto
Duboy, Jaime
Olavarría, Fernando
Wainer, Mauricio
Jimenez, Horacio
Las Heras, Facundo
Reyes, Nicolas
Godoy, Hugo
author_sort Negrín, Roberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main restrictor of lateral shifting of the patella, contributing by 60 % in the first 20° flexion of the knee. MPFL reconstruction has been performed in order to restore the stability of the patella with good results.Lyophilized Gracilis tendon allograft (LGA) compared to Cryopreserved Gracilis tendon allograft (CGA) has a lower cost, does not require to maintain cooling chain or preparation. The purpose of this study is to compare the histological and biomechanical characteristics of an experimental model of reconstruction of the MPFL in porcine patellas with LGA versus CGA. METHODS: Randomized controlled experimental study in porcine model conducted on 36 porcine patellas in which 18 were intervened with LGA and 18 were intervened with CGA. The confluent tunnel technique was used for MPFL reconstruction. Maximum tensile force, allograft elongation and stiffness of the construct were measured. The cellularity and collagen tissue distribution were evaluated in the allografts. The histological and biomechanical characteristics of the LGA were compared to those of the CGA. RESULTS: The median of the maximum tensile force for the LGA group was 299.63 N and 280.86 N for the CGA group (p = 0.45). The median of the stiffness was 57.86 N/mm for the LGA and 54.23 N/mm for the CGA (p = 0.2). The median of the elongation for the LGA was 5.95 mm and 6.12 mm for the CGA (p = 0,29). The bone bridge failed in 88.88 % of the constructs with LGA and 94.44 % in those with CGA (p = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed between the LGA group and the CGA group in maximum tensile force, elongation, stiffness, site of rupture and histological characteristics. The use of a lyophilized Gracilis tendon allograft for MPFL reconstruction confers the same histological and biomechanical characteristics as a cryopreserved Gracilis tendon allograft.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5013004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50130042016-09-22 Biomechanical and histological comparison between the cryopreserved and the lyophilized Gracilis tendon allograft for MPFL reconstruction, a cadaveric experimental study Negrín, Roberto Duboy, Jaime Olavarría, Fernando Wainer, Mauricio Jimenez, Horacio Las Heras, Facundo Reyes, Nicolas Godoy, Hugo J Exp Orthop Research BACKGROUND: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main restrictor of lateral shifting of the patella, contributing by 60 % in the first 20° flexion of the knee. MPFL reconstruction has been performed in order to restore the stability of the patella with good results.Lyophilized Gracilis tendon allograft (LGA) compared to Cryopreserved Gracilis tendon allograft (CGA) has a lower cost, does not require to maintain cooling chain or preparation. The purpose of this study is to compare the histological and biomechanical characteristics of an experimental model of reconstruction of the MPFL in porcine patellas with LGA versus CGA. METHODS: Randomized controlled experimental study in porcine model conducted on 36 porcine patellas in which 18 were intervened with LGA and 18 were intervened with CGA. The confluent tunnel technique was used for MPFL reconstruction. Maximum tensile force, allograft elongation and stiffness of the construct were measured. The cellularity and collagen tissue distribution were evaluated in the allografts. The histological and biomechanical characteristics of the LGA were compared to those of the CGA. RESULTS: The median of the maximum tensile force for the LGA group was 299.63 N and 280.86 N for the CGA group (p = 0.45). The median of the stiffness was 57.86 N/mm for the LGA and 54.23 N/mm for the CGA (p = 0.2). The median of the elongation for the LGA was 5.95 mm and 6.12 mm for the CGA (p = 0,29). The bone bridge failed in 88.88 % of the constructs with LGA and 94.44 % in those with CGA (p = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed between the LGA group and the CGA group in maximum tensile force, elongation, stiffness, site of rupture and histological characteristics. The use of a lyophilized Gracilis tendon allograft for MPFL reconstruction confers the same histological and biomechanical characteristics as a cryopreserved Gracilis tendon allograft. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5013004/ /pubmed/27600522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-016-0056-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Negrín, Roberto
Duboy, Jaime
Olavarría, Fernando
Wainer, Mauricio
Jimenez, Horacio
Las Heras, Facundo
Reyes, Nicolas
Godoy, Hugo
Biomechanical and histological comparison between the cryopreserved and the lyophilized Gracilis tendon allograft for MPFL reconstruction, a cadaveric experimental study
title Biomechanical and histological comparison between the cryopreserved and the lyophilized Gracilis tendon allograft for MPFL reconstruction, a cadaveric experimental study
title_full Biomechanical and histological comparison between the cryopreserved and the lyophilized Gracilis tendon allograft for MPFL reconstruction, a cadaveric experimental study
title_fullStr Biomechanical and histological comparison between the cryopreserved and the lyophilized Gracilis tendon allograft for MPFL reconstruction, a cadaveric experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical and histological comparison between the cryopreserved and the lyophilized Gracilis tendon allograft for MPFL reconstruction, a cadaveric experimental study
title_short Biomechanical and histological comparison between the cryopreserved and the lyophilized Gracilis tendon allograft for MPFL reconstruction, a cadaveric experimental study
title_sort biomechanical and histological comparison between the cryopreserved and the lyophilized gracilis tendon allograft for mpfl reconstruction, a cadaveric experimental study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27600522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-016-0056-2
work_keys_str_mv AT negrinroberto biomechanicalandhistologicalcomparisonbetweenthecryopreservedandthelyophilizedgracilistendonallograftformpflreconstructionacadavericexperimentalstudy
AT duboyjaime biomechanicalandhistologicalcomparisonbetweenthecryopreservedandthelyophilizedgracilistendonallograftformpflreconstructionacadavericexperimentalstudy
AT olavarriafernando biomechanicalandhistologicalcomparisonbetweenthecryopreservedandthelyophilizedgracilistendonallograftformpflreconstructionacadavericexperimentalstudy
AT wainermauricio biomechanicalandhistologicalcomparisonbetweenthecryopreservedandthelyophilizedgracilistendonallograftformpflreconstructionacadavericexperimentalstudy
AT jimenezhoracio biomechanicalandhistologicalcomparisonbetweenthecryopreservedandthelyophilizedgracilistendonallograftformpflreconstructionacadavericexperimentalstudy
AT lasherasfacundo biomechanicalandhistologicalcomparisonbetweenthecryopreservedandthelyophilizedgracilistendonallograftformpflreconstructionacadavericexperimentalstudy
AT reyesnicolas biomechanicalandhistologicalcomparisonbetweenthecryopreservedandthelyophilizedgracilistendonallograftformpflreconstructionacadavericexperimentalstudy
AT godoyhugo biomechanicalandhistologicalcomparisonbetweenthecryopreservedandthelyophilizedgracilistendonallograftformpflreconstructionacadavericexperimentalstudy