Cargando…

Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500

PURPOSE: To compare the measurements and failure rates obtained with a new swept source optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based biometry to IOLMaster 500. SETTING: Eye Clinic, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study and evaluation of a new...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akman, Ahmet, Asena, Leyla, Güngör, Sirel Gür
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26674777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307779
_version_ 1782452105191096320
author Akman, Ahmet
Asena, Leyla
Güngör, Sirel Gür
author_facet Akman, Ahmet
Asena, Leyla
Güngör, Sirel Gür
author_sort Akman, Ahmet
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the measurements and failure rates obtained with a new swept source optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based biometry to IOLMaster 500. SETTING: Eye Clinic, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study and evaluation of a new diagnostic technology. METHODS: 188 eyes of 101 subjects were included in the study. Measurements of axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal power (K1 and K2) and the measurement failure rate with the new Zeiss IOLMaster 700 were compared with those obtained with the IOLMaster 500. The results were evaluated using Bland–Altman analyses. The differences between both methods were assessed using the paired samples t test, and their correlation was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The mean age was 68.32±12.71 years and the male/female ratio was 29/72. The agreements between two devices were outstanding regarding AL (ICC=1.0), ACD (ICC=0.920), K1 (ICC=0.992) and K2 (ICC=0.989) values. IOLMaster 700 was able to measure ACD AL, K1 and K2 in all eyes within high-quality SD limits of the manufacturer. IOLMaster 500 was able to measure ACD in 175 eyes, whereas measurements were not possible in the remaining 13 eyes. AL measurements were not possible for 17 eyes with IOLMaster 500. Nine of these eyes had posterior subcapsular cataracts and eight had dense nuclear cataracts. CONCLUSIONS: Although the agreement between the two devices was excellent, the IOLMaster 700 was more effective in obtaining biometric measurements in eyes with posterior subcapsular and dense nuclear cataracts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5013111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50131112016-09-12 Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500 Akman, Ahmet Asena, Leyla Güngör, Sirel Gür Br J Ophthalmol Clinical Science PURPOSE: To compare the measurements and failure rates obtained with a new swept source optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based biometry to IOLMaster 500. SETTING: Eye Clinic, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study and evaluation of a new diagnostic technology. METHODS: 188 eyes of 101 subjects were included in the study. Measurements of axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal power (K1 and K2) and the measurement failure rate with the new Zeiss IOLMaster 700 were compared with those obtained with the IOLMaster 500. The results were evaluated using Bland–Altman analyses. The differences between both methods were assessed using the paired samples t test, and their correlation was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The mean age was 68.32±12.71 years and the male/female ratio was 29/72. The agreements between two devices were outstanding regarding AL (ICC=1.0), ACD (ICC=0.920), K1 (ICC=0.992) and K2 (ICC=0.989) values. IOLMaster 700 was able to measure ACD AL, K1 and K2 in all eyes within high-quality SD limits of the manufacturer. IOLMaster 500 was able to measure ACD in 175 eyes, whereas measurements were not possible in the remaining 13 eyes. AL measurements were not possible for 17 eyes with IOLMaster 500. Nine of these eyes had posterior subcapsular cataracts and eight had dense nuclear cataracts. CONCLUSIONS: Although the agreement between the two devices was excellent, the IOLMaster 700 was more effective in obtaining biometric measurements in eyes with posterior subcapsular and dense nuclear cataracts. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09 2015-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5013111/ /pubmed/26674777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307779 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Akman, Ahmet
Asena, Leyla
Güngör, Sirel Gür
Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500
title Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500
title_full Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500
title_fullStr Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500
title_short Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500
title_sort evaluation and comparison of the new swept source oct-based iolmaster 700 with the iolmaster 500
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26674777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307779
work_keys_str_mv AT akmanahmet evaluationandcomparisonofthenewsweptsourceoctbasediolmaster700withtheiolmaster500
AT asenaleyla evaluationandcomparisonofthenewsweptsourceoctbasediolmaster700withtheiolmaster500
AT gungorsirelgur evaluationandcomparisonofthenewsweptsourceoctbasediolmaster700withtheiolmaster500