Cargando…

Insertion Success of the Laryngeal Tube in Emergency Airway Management

Background. Emergency airway management (AM) is a priority when resuscitating critically ill or severely injured patients. The goal of this study was to determine the success rates of LT insertion during AM. Methods. Studies that included LT first-pass insertion (FPI) and overall-pass insertion (OPI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernhard, Michael, Gries, André, Ramshorn-Zimmer, Alexandra, Wenzel, Volker, Hossfeld, Bjoern
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27642595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3619159
_version_ 1782452122668761088
author Bernhard, Michael
Gries, André
Ramshorn-Zimmer, Alexandra
Wenzel, Volker
Hossfeld, Bjoern
author_facet Bernhard, Michael
Gries, André
Ramshorn-Zimmer, Alexandra
Wenzel, Volker
Hossfeld, Bjoern
author_sort Bernhard, Michael
collection PubMed
description Background. Emergency airway management (AM) is a priority when resuscitating critically ill or severely injured patients. The goal of this study was to determine the success rates of LT insertion during AM. Methods. Studies that included LT first-pass insertion (FPI) and overall-pass insertion (OPI) success by emergency medical services and in-hospital providers performing AM for emergency situations as well as for scheduled surgery published until July 2014 were searched systematically in Medline. Results. Data of 36 studies (n = 1,897) reported a LT FPI success by physicians of 82.5% with an OPI success of 93.6% (p < 0.001). A cumulative analysis of all 53 studies (n = 3,600) led to FPI and OPI success of 80.1% and 92.6% (p < 0.001), respectively. The results of 26 studies (n = 2,159) comparing the LT with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) demonstrated a FPI success of 77.0 versus 78.7% (p = 0.36) and an OPI success of 92.2 versus 97.7% (p < 0.001). Conclusion. LT insertion failed in the first attempt in one out of five patients, with an overall failure rate in one out of 14 patients. When compared with the LT, the LMA had a cumulative 5.5% better OPI success rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5013225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50132252016-09-18 Insertion Success of the Laryngeal Tube in Emergency Airway Management Bernhard, Michael Gries, André Ramshorn-Zimmer, Alexandra Wenzel, Volker Hossfeld, Bjoern Biomed Res Int Review Article Background. Emergency airway management (AM) is a priority when resuscitating critically ill or severely injured patients. The goal of this study was to determine the success rates of LT insertion during AM. Methods. Studies that included LT first-pass insertion (FPI) and overall-pass insertion (OPI) success by emergency medical services and in-hospital providers performing AM for emergency situations as well as for scheduled surgery published until July 2014 were searched systematically in Medline. Results. Data of 36 studies (n = 1,897) reported a LT FPI success by physicians of 82.5% with an OPI success of 93.6% (p < 0.001). A cumulative analysis of all 53 studies (n = 3,600) led to FPI and OPI success of 80.1% and 92.6% (p < 0.001), respectively. The results of 26 studies (n = 2,159) comparing the LT with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) demonstrated a FPI success of 77.0 versus 78.7% (p = 0.36) and an OPI success of 92.2 versus 97.7% (p < 0.001). Conclusion. LT insertion failed in the first attempt in one out of five patients, with an overall failure rate in one out of 14 patients. When compared with the LT, the LMA had a cumulative 5.5% better OPI success rate. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5013225/ /pubmed/27642595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3619159 Text en Copyright © 2016 Michael Bernhard et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Bernhard, Michael
Gries, André
Ramshorn-Zimmer, Alexandra
Wenzel, Volker
Hossfeld, Bjoern
Insertion Success of the Laryngeal Tube in Emergency Airway Management
title Insertion Success of the Laryngeal Tube in Emergency Airway Management
title_full Insertion Success of the Laryngeal Tube in Emergency Airway Management
title_fullStr Insertion Success of the Laryngeal Tube in Emergency Airway Management
title_full_unstemmed Insertion Success of the Laryngeal Tube in Emergency Airway Management
title_short Insertion Success of the Laryngeal Tube in Emergency Airway Management
title_sort insertion success of the laryngeal tube in emergency airway management
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27642595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3619159
work_keys_str_mv AT bernhardmichael insertionsuccessofthelaryngealtubeinemergencyairwaymanagement
AT griesandre insertionsuccessofthelaryngealtubeinemergencyairwaymanagement
AT ramshornzimmeralexandra insertionsuccessofthelaryngealtubeinemergencyairwaymanagement
AT wenzelvolker insertionsuccessofthelaryngealtubeinemergencyairwaymanagement
AT hossfeldbjoern insertionsuccessofthelaryngealtubeinemergencyairwaymanagement