Cargando…

Motion analysis in the field of dentistry: a kinematic comparison of dentists and orthodontists

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a kinematic comparison of occupational posture in orthodontists and dentists in their workplace. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Dentist surgeries and departments of orthodontics at university medical centres in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample of 21 (10 fe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nowak, J, Erbe, C, Hauck, I, Groneberg, D A, Hermanns, I, Ellegast, R, Ditchen, D, Ohlendorf, D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27531728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011559
_version_ 1782452143897182208
author Nowak, J
Erbe, C
Hauck, I
Groneberg, D A
Hermanns, I
Ellegast, R
Ditchen, D
Ohlendorf, D
author_facet Nowak, J
Erbe, C
Hauck, I
Groneberg, D A
Hermanns, I
Ellegast, R
Ditchen, D
Ohlendorf, D
author_sort Nowak, J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To conduct a kinematic comparison of occupational posture in orthodontists and dentists in their workplace. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Dentist surgeries and departments of orthodontics at university medical centres in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample of 21 (10 female, 11 male) dentists (group G1) and 21 (13 female, 8 male) orthodontists (G2) with one male dropout in G2. OUTCOME MEASURES: The CUELA (computer-assisted acquisition and long-term analysis of musculoskeletal loads) system was used to analyse occupational posture. Parallel to the recording through the CUELA system, a software-supported analysis of the activities performed (I: treatment; II: office; III: other activities) was carried out. In line with ergonomic standards the measured body angles are categorised into neutral, moderate and awkward postures. Activities between the aforementioned groups are compared using the stratified van Elteren U test and the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney U test. All p values are subject to the Bonferroni–Holm correction. The level of significance is set at 5%. RESULTS: The percentage of time spent on activities in categories I–II–III was as follows: dentists 41%–23%–36% and orthodontists 28%–37%–35%. The posture analysis of both groups showed, for all percentiles (P5–95), angle values primarily in the neutral or moderate range. However, depending on the activity performed, between 5% and 25% of working hours were spent in unfavourable postures, especially in the head-and-neck area. Orthodontists have a greater tendency than dentists to perform treatment activities with the head and torso in unfavourable positions. The statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to the duration and the relevance of the activities performed confirm this assumption for all three categories (p<0.01, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Generally, both groups perform treatment activities in postures that are in the neutral or medium range; however, dentists had slightly more unfavourable postures during treatment for a greater share of their work day.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5013339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50133392016-09-12 Motion analysis in the field of dentistry: a kinematic comparison of dentists and orthodontists Nowak, J Erbe, C Hauck, I Groneberg, D A Hermanns, I Ellegast, R Ditchen, D Ohlendorf, D BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine OBJECTIVES: To conduct a kinematic comparison of occupational posture in orthodontists and dentists in their workplace. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Dentist surgeries and departments of orthodontics at university medical centres in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample of 21 (10 female, 11 male) dentists (group G1) and 21 (13 female, 8 male) orthodontists (G2) with one male dropout in G2. OUTCOME MEASURES: The CUELA (computer-assisted acquisition and long-term analysis of musculoskeletal loads) system was used to analyse occupational posture. Parallel to the recording through the CUELA system, a software-supported analysis of the activities performed (I: treatment; II: office; III: other activities) was carried out. In line with ergonomic standards the measured body angles are categorised into neutral, moderate and awkward postures. Activities between the aforementioned groups are compared using the stratified van Elteren U test and the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney U test. All p values are subject to the Bonferroni–Holm correction. The level of significance is set at 5%. RESULTS: The percentage of time spent on activities in categories I–II–III was as follows: dentists 41%–23%–36% and orthodontists 28%–37%–35%. The posture analysis of both groups showed, for all percentiles (P5–95), angle values primarily in the neutral or moderate range. However, depending on the activity performed, between 5% and 25% of working hours were spent in unfavourable postures, especially in the head-and-neck area. Orthodontists have a greater tendency than dentists to perform treatment activities with the head and torso in unfavourable positions. The statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to the duration and the relevance of the activities performed confirm this assumption for all three categories (p<0.01, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Generally, both groups perform treatment activities in postures that are in the neutral or medium range; however, dentists had slightly more unfavourable postures during treatment for a greater share of their work day. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5013339/ /pubmed/27531728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011559 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Nowak, J
Erbe, C
Hauck, I
Groneberg, D A
Hermanns, I
Ellegast, R
Ditchen, D
Ohlendorf, D
Motion analysis in the field of dentistry: a kinematic comparison of dentists and orthodontists
title Motion analysis in the field of dentistry: a kinematic comparison of dentists and orthodontists
title_full Motion analysis in the field of dentistry: a kinematic comparison of dentists and orthodontists
title_fullStr Motion analysis in the field of dentistry: a kinematic comparison of dentists and orthodontists
title_full_unstemmed Motion analysis in the field of dentistry: a kinematic comparison of dentists and orthodontists
title_short Motion analysis in the field of dentistry: a kinematic comparison of dentists and orthodontists
title_sort motion analysis in the field of dentistry: a kinematic comparison of dentists and orthodontists
topic Occupational and Environmental Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27531728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011559
work_keys_str_mv AT nowakj motionanalysisinthefieldofdentistryakinematiccomparisonofdentistsandorthodontists
AT erbec motionanalysisinthefieldofdentistryakinematiccomparisonofdentistsandorthodontists
AT haucki motionanalysisinthefieldofdentistryakinematiccomparisonofdentistsandorthodontists
AT gronebergda motionanalysisinthefieldofdentistryakinematiccomparisonofdentistsandorthodontists
AT hermannsi motionanalysisinthefieldofdentistryakinematiccomparisonofdentistsandorthodontists
AT ellegastr motionanalysisinthefieldofdentistryakinematiccomparisonofdentistsandorthodontists
AT ditchend motionanalysisinthefieldofdentistryakinematiccomparisonofdentistsandorthodontists
AT ohlendorfd motionanalysisinthefieldofdentistryakinematiccomparisonofdentistsandorthodontists