Cargando…
Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study
BACKGROUND: The British Medical Journal's (BMJ's) patient revolution strives for collaboration with patients in healthcare and health research. This paper studies collaboration with people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in health research, also known as inclusive health research. Curr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011861 |
_version_ | 1782452146216632320 |
---|---|
author | Frankena, T K Naaldenberg, J Cardol, M Meijering, J V Leusink, G van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, H M J |
author_facet | Frankena, T K Naaldenberg, J Cardol, M Meijering, J V Leusink, G van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, H M J |
author_sort | Frankena, T K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The British Medical Journal's (BMJ's) patient revolution strives for collaboration with patients in healthcare and health research. This paper studies collaboration with people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in health research, also known as inclusive health research. Currently, transparency and agreement among academics is lacking regarding its main aspects, preventing upscaling of the patient revolution. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to gain agreement among academics on 3 aspects of inclusive health research for people with ID: (1) designs and methods, (2) most important characteristics and (3) outcomes. DESIGN: A Delphi study was conducted with academics with experience in inclusive (health) research and on people with ID. The study consisted of 2 sequential questionnaire rounds (n=24; n=17), followed by in-depth interviews (n=10). RESULTS: Academics agreed on (1) a collaborative approach to be most suitable to inclusive health research, (2) characteristics regarding the accessibility and facilitation of inclusive health research, and (3) several outcomes of inclusive health research for people with ID and healthcare. Other characteristics agreed on included: atmosphere, relationship, engagement, partnership and power. It was stressed that these characteristics ensure meaningful inclusion. Interviewed academics voiced the need for a tool supporting the facilitation and evaluation of inclusive health research. There was ambiguity as to what this tool should comprise and the extent to which it was possible to capture the complex process of inclusive health research. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the need for transparency, facilitation and evaluation of inclusive health research. The need for in-depth interviews after 2 Delphi rounds underlines its complexity and context dependence. To increase process transparency, future research should focus on gaining insight into inclusive health research in its context. A tool could be developed to facilitate and evaluate inclusive health research. This tool will be partially applicable to participatory research in general and thereby upscale the patient revolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5013349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50133492016-09-12 Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study Frankena, T K Naaldenberg, J Cardol, M Meijering, J V Leusink, G van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, H M J BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine BACKGROUND: The British Medical Journal's (BMJ's) patient revolution strives for collaboration with patients in healthcare and health research. This paper studies collaboration with people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in health research, also known as inclusive health research. Currently, transparency and agreement among academics is lacking regarding its main aspects, preventing upscaling of the patient revolution. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to gain agreement among academics on 3 aspects of inclusive health research for people with ID: (1) designs and methods, (2) most important characteristics and (3) outcomes. DESIGN: A Delphi study was conducted with academics with experience in inclusive (health) research and on people with ID. The study consisted of 2 sequential questionnaire rounds (n=24; n=17), followed by in-depth interviews (n=10). RESULTS: Academics agreed on (1) a collaborative approach to be most suitable to inclusive health research, (2) characteristics regarding the accessibility and facilitation of inclusive health research, and (3) several outcomes of inclusive health research for people with ID and healthcare. Other characteristics agreed on included: atmosphere, relationship, engagement, partnership and power. It was stressed that these characteristics ensure meaningful inclusion. Interviewed academics voiced the need for a tool supporting the facilitation and evaluation of inclusive health research. There was ambiguity as to what this tool should comprise and the extent to which it was possible to capture the complex process of inclusive health research. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the need for transparency, facilitation and evaluation of inclusive health research. The need for in-depth interviews after 2 Delphi rounds underlines its complexity and context dependence. To increase process transparency, future research should focus on gaining insight into inclusive health research in its context. A tool could be developed to facilitate and evaluate inclusive health research. This tool will be partially applicable to participatory research in general and thereby upscale the patient revolution. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5013349/ /pubmed/27540101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011861 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Frankena, T K Naaldenberg, J Cardol, M Meijering, J V Leusink, G van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, H M J Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study |
title | Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study |
title_full | Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study |
title_fullStr | Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study |
title_short | Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study |
title_sort | exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified delphi study |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011861 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frankenatk exploringacademicsviewsondesignsmethodscharacteristicsandoutcomesofinclusivehealthresearchwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesamodifieddelphistudy AT naaldenbergj exploringacademicsviewsondesignsmethodscharacteristicsandoutcomesofinclusivehealthresearchwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesamodifieddelphistudy AT cardolm exploringacademicsviewsondesignsmethodscharacteristicsandoutcomesofinclusivehealthresearchwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesamodifieddelphistudy AT meijeringjv exploringacademicsviewsondesignsmethodscharacteristicsandoutcomesofinclusivehealthresearchwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesamodifieddelphistudy AT leusinkg exploringacademicsviewsondesignsmethodscharacteristicsandoutcomesofinclusivehealthresearchwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesamodifieddelphistudy AT vanschrojensteinlantmandevalkhmj exploringacademicsviewsondesignsmethodscharacteristicsandoutcomesofinclusivehealthresearchwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesamodifieddelphistudy |