Cargando…

Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study

BACKGROUND: The British Medical Journal's (BMJ's) patient revolution strives for collaboration with patients in healthcare and health research. This paper studies collaboration with people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in health research, also known as inclusive health research. Curr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frankena, T K, Naaldenberg, J, Cardol, M, Meijering, J V, Leusink, G, van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, H M J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011861
_version_ 1782452146216632320
author Frankena, T K
Naaldenberg, J
Cardol, M
Meijering, J V
Leusink, G
van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, H M J
author_facet Frankena, T K
Naaldenberg, J
Cardol, M
Meijering, J V
Leusink, G
van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, H M J
author_sort Frankena, T K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The British Medical Journal's (BMJ's) patient revolution strives for collaboration with patients in healthcare and health research. This paper studies collaboration with people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in health research, also known as inclusive health research. Currently, transparency and agreement among academics is lacking regarding its main aspects, preventing upscaling of the patient revolution. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to gain agreement among academics on 3 aspects of inclusive health research for people with ID: (1) designs and methods, (2) most important characteristics and (3) outcomes. DESIGN: A Delphi study was conducted with academics with experience in inclusive (health) research and on people with ID. The study consisted of 2 sequential questionnaire rounds (n=24; n=17), followed by in-depth interviews (n=10). RESULTS: Academics agreed on (1) a collaborative approach to be most suitable to inclusive health research, (2) characteristics regarding the accessibility and facilitation of inclusive health research, and (3) several outcomes of inclusive health research for people with ID and healthcare. Other characteristics agreed on included: atmosphere, relationship, engagement, partnership and power. It was stressed that these characteristics ensure meaningful inclusion. Interviewed academics voiced the need for a tool supporting the facilitation and evaluation of inclusive health research. There was ambiguity as to what this tool should comprise and the extent to which it was possible to capture the complex process of inclusive health research. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the need for transparency, facilitation and evaluation of inclusive health research. The need for in-depth interviews after 2 Delphi rounds underlines its complexity and context dependence. To increase process transparency, future research should focus on gaining insight into inclusive health research in its context. A tool could be developed to facilitate and evaluate inclusive health research. This tool will be partially applicable to participatory research in general and thereby upscale the patient revolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5013349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50133492016-09-12 Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study Frankena, T K Naaldenberg, J Cardol, M Meijering, J V Leusink, G van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, H M J BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine BACKGROUND: The British Medical Journal's (BMJ's) patient revolution strives for collaboration with patients in healthcare and health research. This paper studies collaboration with people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in health research, also known as inclusive health research. Currently, transparency and agreement among academics is lacking regarding its main aspects, preventing upscaling of the patient revolution. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to gain agreement among academics on 3 aspects of inclusive health research for people with ID: (1) designs and methods, (2) most important characteristics and (3) outcomes. DESIGN: A Delphi study was conducted with academics with experience in inclusive (health) research and on people with ID. The study consisted of 2 sequential questionnaire rounds (n=24; n=17), followed by in-depth interviews (n=10). RESULTS: Academics agreed on (1) a collaborative approach to be most suitable to inclusive health research, (2) characteristics regarding the accessibility and facilitation of inclusive health research, and (3) several outcomes of inclusive health research for people with ID and healthcare. Other characteristics agreed on included: atmosphere, relationship, engagement, partnership and power. It was stressed that these characteristics ensure meaningful inclusion. Interviewed academics voiced the need for a tool supporting the facilitation and evaluation of inclusive health research. There was ambiguity as to what this tool should comprise and the extent to which it was possible to capture the complex process of inclusive health research. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the need for transparency, facilitation and evaluation of inclusive health research. The need for in-depth interviews after 2 Delphi rounds underlines its complexity and context dependence. To increase process transparency, future research should focus on gaining insight into inclusive health research in its context. A tool could be developed to facilitate and evaluate inclusive health research. This tool will be partially applicable to participatory research in general and thereby upscale the patient revolution. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5013349/ /pubmed/27540101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011861 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Frankena, T K
Naaldenberg, J
Cardol, M
Meijering, J V
Leusink, G
van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, H M J
Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study
title Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study
title_full Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study
title_fullStr Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study
title_short Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study
title_sort exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified delphi study
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011861
work_keys_str_mv AT frankenatk exploringacademicsviewsondesignsmethodscharacteristicsandoutcomesofinclusivehealthresearchwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesamodifieddelphistudy
AT naaldenbergj exploringacademicsviewsondesignsmethodscharacteristicsandoutcomesofinclusivehealthresearchwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesamodifieddelphistudy
AT cardolm exploringacademicsviewsondesignsmethodscharacteristicsandoutcomesofinclusivehealthresearchwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesamodifieddelphistudy
AT meijeringjv exploringacademicsviewsondesignsmethodscharacteristicsandoutcomesofinclusivehealthresearchwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesamodifieddelphistudy
AT leusinkg exploringacademicsviewsondesignsmethodscharacteristicsandoutcomesofinclusivehealthresearchwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesamodifieddelphistudy
AT vanschrojensteinlantmandevalkhmj exploringacademicsviewsondesignsmethodscharacteristicsandoutcomesofinclusivehealthresearchwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesamodifieddelphistudy