Cargando…

Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FALCON trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Misidentification of the extrahepatic bile duct anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the main cause of bile duct injury. Easier intraoperative recognition of the biliary anatomy may be accomplished by using near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging after an intravenous i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Bos, Jacqueline, Schols, Rutger M, Luyer, Misha D, van Dam, Ronald M, Vahrmeijer, Alexander L, Meijerink, Wilhelmus J, Gobardhan, Paul D, van Dam, Gooitzen M, Bouvy, Nicole D, Stassen, Laurents P S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27566635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011668
_version_ 1782452147159302144
author van den Bos, Jacqueline
Schols, Rutger M
Luyer, Misha D
van Dam, Ronald M
Vahrmeijer, Alexander L
Meijerink, Wilhelmus J
Gobardhan, Paul D
van Dam, Gooitzen M
Bouvy, Nicole D
Stassen, Laurents P S
author_facet van den Bos, Jacqueline
Schols, Rutger M
Luyer, Misha D
van Dam, Ronald M
Vahrmeijer, Alexander L
Meijerink, Wilhelmus J
Gobardhan, Paul D
van Dam, Gooitzen M
Bouvy, Nicole D
Stassen, Laurents P S
author_sort van den Bos, Jacqueline
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Misidentification of the extrahepatic bile duct anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the main cause of bile duct injury. Easier intraoperative recognition of the biliary anatomy may be accomplished by using near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging after an intravenous injection of indocyanine green (ICG). Promising results were reported for successful intraoperative identification of the extrahepatic bile ducts compared to conventional laparoscopic imaging. However, routine use of ICG fluorescence laparoscopy has not gained wide clinical acceptance yet due to a lack of high-quality clinical data. Therefore, this multicentre randomised clinical study was designed to assess the potential added value of the NIRF imaging technique during LC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial will be carried out to assess the use of NIRF imaging in LC. In total, 308 patients scheduled for an elective LC will be included. These patients will be randomised into a NIRF imaging laparoscopic cholecystectomy (NIRF-LC) group and a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) group. The primary end point is time to ‘critical view of safety’ (CVS). Secondary end points are ‘time to identification of the cystic duct (CD), of the common bile duct, the transition of CD in the gallbladder and the transition of the cystic artery in the gallbladder, these all during dissection of CVS’; ‘total surgical time’; ‘intraoperative bile leakage from the gallbladder or cystic duct’; ‘bile duct injury’; ‘postoperative length of stay’, ‘complications due to the injected ICG’; ‘conversion to open cholecystectomy’; ‘postoperative complications (until 90 days postoperatively)’ and ‘cost-minimisation’. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Maastricht University Medical Center/Maastricht University; the trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The findings of this study will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02558556.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5013353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50133532016-09-12 Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FALCON trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial van den Bos, Jacqueline Schols, Rutger M Luyer, Misha D van Dam, Ronald M Vahrmeijer, Alexander L Meijerink, Wilhelmus J Gobardhan, Paul D van Dam, Gooitzen M Bouvy, Nicole D Stassen, Laurents P S BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Misidentification of the extrahepatic bile duct anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the main cause of bile duct injury. Easier intraoperative recognition of the biliary anatomy may be accomplished by using near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging after an intravenous injection of indocyanine green (ICG). Promising results were reported for successful intraoperative identification of the extrahepatic bile ducts compared to conventional laparoscopic imaging. However, routine use of ICG fluorescence laparoscopy has not gained wide clinical acceptance yet due to a lack of high-quality clinical data. Therefore, this multicentre randomised clinical study was designed to assess the potential added value of the NIRF imaging technique during LC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial will be carried out to assess the use of NIRF imaging in LC. In total, 308 patients scheduled for an elective LC will be included. These patients will be randomised into a NIRF imaging laparoscopic cholecystectomy (NIRF-LC) group and a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) group. The primary end point is time to ‘critical view of safety’ (CVS). Secondary end points are ‘time to identification of the cystic duct (CD), of the common bile duct, the transition of CD in the gallbladder and the transition of the cystic artery in the gallbladder, these all during dissection of CVS’; ‘total surgical time’; ‘intraoperative bile leakage from the gallbladder or cystic duct’; ‘bile duct injury’; ‘postoperative length of stay’, ‘complications due to the injected ICG’; ‘conversion to open cholecystectomy’; ‘postoperative complications (until 90 days postoperatively)’ and ‘cost-minimisation’. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Maastricht University Medical Center/Maastricht University; the trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The findings of this study will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02558556. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5013353/ /pubmed/27566635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011668 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Surgery
van den Bos, Jacqueline
Schols, Rutger M
Luyer, Misha D
van Dam, Ronald M
Vahrmeijer, Alexander L
Meijerink, Wilhelmus J
Gobardhan, Paul D
van Dam, Gooitzen M
Bouvy, Nicole D
Stassen, Laurents P S
Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FALCON trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FALCON trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FALCON trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FALCON trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FALCON trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_short Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FALCON trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_sort near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (falcon trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27566635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011668
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbosjacqueline nearinfraredfluorescencecholangiographyassistedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyversusconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyfalcontrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT scholsrutgerm nearinfraredfluorescencecholangiographyassistedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyversusconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyfalcontrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT luyermishad nearinfraredfluorescencecholangiographyassistedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyversusconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyfalcontrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandamronaldm nearinfraredfluorescencecholangiographyassistedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyversusconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyfalcontrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vahrmeijeralexanderl nearinfraredfluorescencecholangiographyassistedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyversusconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyfalcontrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT meijerinkwilhelmusj nearinfraredfluorescencecholangiographyassistedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyversusconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyfalcontrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gobardhanpauld nearinfraredfluorescencecholangiographyassistedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyversusconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyfalcontrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandamgooitzenm nearinfraredfluorescencecholangiographyassistedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyversusconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyfalcontrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bouvynicoled nearinfraredfluorescencecholangiographyassistedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyversusconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyfalcontrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stassenlaurentsps nearinfraredfluorescencecholangiographyassistedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyversusconventionallaparoscopiccholecystectomyfalcontrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial