Cargando…

Plasma glucose and insulin response to two oral nutrition supplements in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the glucose usage of two oral nutritional supplement (ONS) products and to assess whether a diabetes-specific formulation provides improved glucose stabilization and management compared with a standard formula. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huhmann, Maureen B, Smith, Kristen N, Schwartz, Sherwyn L, Haller, Stacie K, Irvin, Sarah, Cohen, Sarah S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000240
_version_ 1782452147847168000
author Huhmann, Maureen B
Smith, Kristen N
Schwartz, Sherwyn L
Haller, Stacie K
Irvin, Sarah
Cohen, Sarah S
author_facet Huhmann, Maureen B
Smith, Kristen N
Schwartz, Sherwyn L
Haller, Stacie K
Irvin, Sarah
Cohen, Sarah S
author_sort Huhmann, Maureen B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the glucose usage of two oral nutritional supplement (ONS) products and to assess whether a diabetes-specific formulation provides improved glucose stabilization and management compared with a standard formula. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 12 subjects with type 2 diabetes (7 males and 5 females) completed a randomized, cross-over design trial. Each subject consumed isocaloric amounts of either the standard ONS or the diabetes-specific formula ONS on different dates, 1 week apart. Glucose and insulin measures were recorded at baseline, and 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210 and 240 min after the beverage was consumed and then used to calculate area under the curve (AUC) for each subject. RESULTS: The mean glucose AUC was lower in the diabetes-specific ONS group than in the standard group (p<0.0001), but there was not a significant difference observed for mean insulin AUC (p=0.068). A sensitivity analysis of the mean insulin AUC measures was performed by removing a potential outlier from the analysis, and this resulted in a significant difference between the groups (p=0.012). First-phase insulin measures and an insulinogenic index calculated for the beverages showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the results of this trial of 12 subjects, the diabetes-specific ONS appears to provide better glucose maintenance in persons with type 2 diabetes when compared to the standard formula ONS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02612675.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5013356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50133562016-09-19 Plasma glucose and insulin response to two oral nutrition supplements in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus Huhmann, Maureen B Smith, Kristen N Schwartz, Sherwyn L Haller, Stacie K Irvin, Sarah Cohen, Sarah S BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the glucose usage of two oral nutritional supplement (ONS) products and to assess whether a diabetes-specific formulation provides improved glucose stabilization and management compared with a standard formula. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 12 subjects with type 2 diabetes (7 males and 5 females) completed a randomized, cross-over design trial. Each subject consumed isocaloric amounts of either the standard ONS or the diabetes-specific formula ONS on different dates, 1 week apart. Glucose and insulin measures were recorded at baseline, and 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210 and 240 min after the beverage was consumed and then used to calculate area under the curve (AUC) for each subject. RESULTS: The mean glucose AUC was lower in the diabetes-specific ONS group than in the standard group (p<0.0001), but there was not a significant difference observed for mean insulin AUC (p=0.068). A sensitivity analysis of the mean insulin AUC measures was performed by removing a potential outlier from the analysis, and this resulted in a significant difference between the groups (p=0.012). First-phase insulin measures and an insulinogenic index calculated for the beverages showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the results of this trial of 12 subjects, the diabetes-specific ONS appears to provide better glucose maintenance in persons with type 2 diabetes when compared to the standard formula ONS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02612675. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5013356/ /pubmed/27648290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000240 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research
Huhmann, Maureen B
Smith, Kristen N
Schwartz, Sherwyn L
Haller, Stacie K
Irvin, Sarah
Cohen, Sarah S
Plasma glucose and insulin response to two oral nutrition supplements in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title Plasma glucose and insulin response to two oral nutrition supplements in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full Plasma glucose and insulin response to two oral nutrition supplements in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_fullStr Plasma glucose and insulin response to two oral nutrition supplements in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Plasma glucose and insulin response to two oral nutrition supplements in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_short Plasma glucose and insulin response to two oral nutrition supplements in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_sort plasma glucose and insulin response to two oral nutrition supplements in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
topic Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000240
work_keys_str_mv AT huhmannmaureenb plasmaglucoseandinsulinresponsetotwooralnutritionsupplementsinadultswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT smithkristenn plasmaglucoseandinsulinresponsetotwooralnutritionsupplementsinadultswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT schwartzsherwynl plasmaglucoseandinsulinresponsetotwooralnutritionsupplementsinadultswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT hallerstaciek plasmaglucoseandinsulinresponsetotwooralnutritionsupplementsinadultswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT irvinsarah plasmaglucoseandinsulinresponsetotwooralnutritionsupplementsinadultswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT cohensarahs plasmaglucoseandinsulinresponsetotwooralnutritionsupplementsinadultswithtype2diabetesmellitus