Cargando…

Evaluating outpatient transition clinics: a mixed-methods study protocol

INTRODUCTION: To support young people in their transition to adulthood and transfer to adult care, a number of interventions have been developed. One particularly important intervention is the transition clinic (TC), where paediatric and adult providers collaborate. TCs are often advocated as best p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sattoe, Jane N T, Peeters, Mariëlle A C, Hilberink, Sander R, Ista, Erwin, van Staa, AnneLoes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27566639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011926
_version_ 1782452153170788352
author Sattoe, Jane N T
Peeters, Mariëlle A C
Hilberink, Sander R
Ista, Erwin
van Staa, AnneLoes
author_facet Sattoe, Jane N T
Peeters, Mariëlle A C
Hilberink, Sander R
Ista, Erwin
van Staa, AnneLoes
author_sort Sattoe, Jane N T
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To support young people in their transition to adulthood and transfer to adult care, a number of interventions have been developed. One particularly important intervention is the transition clinic (TC), where paediatric and adult providers collaborate. TCs are often advocated as best practices in transition care for young people with chronic conditions, but little is known about TC models and effects. The proposed study aims to gain insight into the added value of a TC compared with usual care (without a TC). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We propose a mixed-methods study with a retrospective controlled design consisting of semistructured interviews among healthcare professionals, observations of consultations with young people, chart reviews of young people transferred 2–4 years prior to data collection and questionnaires among the young people included in the chart reviews. Qualitative data will be analysed through thematic analysis and results will provide insights into structures and daily routines of TCs, and experienced barriers and facilitators in transitional care. Quantitatively, within-group differences on clinical outcomes and healthcare use will be studied over the four measurement moments. Subsequently, comparisons will be made between intervention and control groups on all outcomes at all measurement moments. Primary outcomes are ‘no-show after transfer’ (process outcome) and ‘experiences and satisfaction with the transfer’ (patient-reported outcome). Secondary outcomes consider clinical outcomes, healthcare usage, self-management outcomes and perceived quality of care. ETHICS: The Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus Medical Centre approved the study protocol (MEC-2014-246). DISSEMINATION: Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences. The study started in September 2014 and will continue until December 2016. The same study design will be used in a national study in 20 diabetes settings (2016–2018).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5013382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50133822016-09-12 Evaluating outpatient transition clinics: a mixed-methods study protocol Sattoe, Jane N T Peeters, Mariëlle A C Hilberink, Sander R Ista, Erwin van Staa, AnneLoes BMJ Open Paediatrics INTRODUCTION: To support young people in their transition to adulthood and transfer to adult care, a number of interventions have been developed. One particularly important intervention is the transition clinic (TC), where paediatric and adult providers collaborate. TCs are often advocated as best practices in transition care for young people with chronic conditions, but little is known about TC models and effects. The proposed study aims to gain insight into the added value of a TC compared with usual care (without a TC). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We propose a mixed-methods study with a retrospective controlled design consisting of semistructured interviews among healthcare professionals, observations of consultations with young people, chart reviews of young people transferred 2–4 years prior to data collection and questionnaires among the young people included in the chart reviews. Qualitative data will be analysed through thematic analysis and results will provide insights into structures and daily routines of TCs, and experienced barriers and facilitators in transitional care. Quantitatively, within-group differences on clinical outcomes and healthcare use will be studied over the four measurement moments. Subsequently, comparisons will be made between intervention and control groups on all outcomes at all measurement moments. Primary outcomes are ‘no-show after transfer’ (process outcome) and ‘experiences and satisfaction with the transfer’ (patient-reported outcome). Secondary outcomes consider clinical outcomes, healthcare usage, self-management outcomes and perceived quality of care. ETHICS: The Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus Medical Centre approved the study protocol (MEC-2014-246). DISSEMINATION: Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences. The study started in September 2014 and will continue until December 2016. The same study design will be used in a national study in 20 diabetes settings (2016–2018). BMJ Publishing Group 2016-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5013382/ /pubmed/27566639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011926 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Sattoe, Jane N T
Peeters, Mariëlle A C
Hilberink, Sander R
Ista, Erwin
van Staa, AnneLoes
Evaluating outpatient transition clinics: a mixed-methods study protocol
title Evaluating outpatient transition clinics: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_full Evaluating outpatient transition clinics: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_fullStr Evaluating outpatient transition clinics: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating outpatient transition clinics: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_short Evaluating outpatient transition clinics: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_sort evaluating outpatient transition clinics: a mixed-methods study protocol
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27566639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011926
work_keys_str_mv AT sattoejanent evaluatingoutpatienttransitionclinicsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT peetersmarielleac evaluatingoutpatienttransitionclinicsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT hilberinksanderr evaluatingoutpatienttransitionclinicsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT istaerwin evaluatingoutpatienttransitionclinicsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT vanstaaanneloes evaluatingoutpatienttransitionclinicsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol