Cargando…

A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis

Biofilm accumulation on biomaterial surfaces is a major health concern and significant research efforts are directed towards producing biofilm resistant surfaces and developing biofilm removal techniques. To accurately evaluate biofilm growth and disruption on surfaces, accurate methods which give q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vyas, N., Sammons, R. L., Addison, O., Dehghani, H., Walmsley, A. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32694
_version_ 1782452153848168448
author Vyas, N.
Sammons, R. L.
Addison, O.
Dehghani, H.
Walmsley, A. D.
author_facet Vyas, N.
Sammons, R. L.
Addison, O.
Dehghani, H.
Walmsley, A. D.
author_sort Vyas, N.
collection PubMed
description Biofilm accumulation on biomaterial surfaces is a major health concern and significant research efforts are directed towards producing biofilm resistant surfaces and developing biofilm removal techniques. To accurately evaluate biofilm growth and disruption on surfaces, accurate methods which give quantitative information on biofilm area are needed, as current methods are indirect and inaccurate. We demonstrate the use of machine learning algorithms to segment biofilm from scanning electron microscopy images. A case study showing disruption of biofilm from rough dental implant surfaces using cavitation bubbles from an ultrasonic scaler is used to validate the imaging and analysis protocol developed. Streptococcus mutans biofilm was disrupted from sandblasted, acid etched (SLA) Ti discs and polished Ti discs. Significant biofilm removal occurred due to cavitation from ultrasonic scaling (p < 0.001). The mean sensitivity and specificity values for segmentation of the SLA surface images were 0.80 ± 0.18 and 0.62 ± 0.20 respectively and 0.74 ± 0.13 and 0.86 ± 0.09 respectively for polished surfaces. Cavitation has potential to be used as a novel way to clean dental implants. This imaging and analysis method will be of value to other researchers and manufacturers wishing to study biofilm growth and removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5013386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50133862016-09-12 A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis Vyas, N. Sammons, R. L. Addison, O. Dehghani, H. Walmsley, A. D. Sci Rep Article Biofilm accumulation on biomaterial surfaces is a major health concern and significant research efforts are directed towards producing biofilm resistant surfaces and developing biofilm removal techniques. To accurately evaluate biofilm growth and disruption on surfaces, accurate methods which give quantitative information on biofilm area are needed, as current methods are indirect and inaccurate. We demonstrate the use of machine learning algorithms to segment biofilm from scanning electron microscopy images. A case study showing disruption of biofilm from rough dental implant surfaces using cavitation bubbles from an ultrasonic scaler is used to validate the imaging and analysis protocol developed. Streptococcus mutans biofilm was disrupted from sandblasted, acid etched (SLA) Ti discs and polished Ti discs. Significant biofilm removal occurred due to cavitation from ultrasonic scaling (p < 0.001). The mean sensitivity and specificity values for segmentation of the SLA surface images were 0.80 ± 0.18 and 0.62 ± 0.20 respectively and 0.74 ± 0.13 and 0.86 ± 0.09 respectively for polished surfaces. Cavitation has potential to be used as a novel way to clean dental implants. This imaging and analysis method will be of value to other researchers and manufacturers wishing to study biofilm growth and removal. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5013386/ /pubmed/27601281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32694 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Vyas, N.
Sammons, R. L.
Addison, O.
Dehghani, H.
Walmsley, A. D.
A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis
title A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis
title_full A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis
title_fullStr A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis
title_full_unstemmed A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis
title_short A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis
title_sort quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using sem and image analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32694
work_keys_str_mv AT vyasn aquantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis
AT sammonsrl aquantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis
AT addisono aquantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis
AT dehghanih aquantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis
AT walmsleyad aquantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis
AT vyasn quantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis
AT sammonsrl quantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis
AT addisono quantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis
AT dehghanih quantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis
AT walmsleyad quantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis