Cargando…
A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis
Biofilm accumulation on biomaterial surfaces is a major health concern and significant research efforts are directed towards producing biofilm resistant surfaces and developing biofilm removal techniques. To accurately evaluate biofilm growth and disruption on surfaces, accurate methods which give q...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32694 |
_version_ | 1782452153848168448 |
---|---|
author | Vyas, N. Sammons, R. L. Addison, O. Dehghani, H. Walmsley, A. D. |
author_facet | Vyas, N. Sammons, R. L. Addison, O. Dehghani, H. Walmsley, A. D. |
author_sort | Vyas, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biofilm accumulation on biomaterial surfaces is a major health concern and significant research efforts are directed towards producing biofilm resistant surfaces and developing biofilm removal techniques. To accurately evaluate biofilm growth and disruption on surfaces, accurate methods which give quantitative information on biofilm area are needed, as current methods are indirect and inaccurate. We demonstrate the use of machine learning algorithms to segment biofilm from scanning electron microscopy images. A case study showing disruption of biofilm from rough dental implant surfaces using cavitation bubbles from an ultrasonic scaler is used to validate the imaging and analysis protocol developed. Streptococcus mutans biofilm was disrupted from sandblasted, acid etched (SLA) Ti discs and polished Ti discs. Significant biofilm removal occurred due to cavitation from ultrasonic scaling (p < 0.001). The mean sensitivity and specificity values for segmentation of the SLA surface images were 0.80 ± 0.18 and 0.62 ± 0.20 respectively and 0.74 ± 0.13 and 0.86 ± 0.09 respectively for polished surfaces. Cavitation has potential to be used as a novel way to clean dental implants. This imaging and analysis method will be of value to other researchers and manufacturers wishing to study biofilm growth and removal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5013386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50133862016-09-12 A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis Vyas, N. Sammons, R. L. Addison, O. Dehghani, H. Walmsley, A. D. Sci Rep Article Biofilm accumulation on biomaterial surfaces is a major health concern and significant research efforts are directed towards producing biofilm resistant surfaces and developing biofilm removal techniques. To accurately evaluate biofilm growth and disruption on surfaces, accurate methods which give quantitative information on biofilm area are needed, as current methods are indirect and inaccurate. We demonstrate the use of machine learning algorithms to segment biofilm from scanning electron microscopy images. A case study showing disruption of biofilm from rough dental implant surfaces using cavitation bubbles from an ultrasonic scaler is used to validate the imaging and analysis protocol developed. Streptococcus mutans biofilm was disrupted from sandblasted, acid etched (SLA) Ti discs and polished Ti discs. Significant biofilm removal occurred due to cavitation from ultrasonic scaling (p < 0.001). The mean sensitivity and specificity values for segmentation of the SLA surface images were 0.80 ± 0.18 and 0.62 ± 0.20 respectively and 0.74 ± 0.13 and 0.86 ± 0.09 respectively for polished surfaces. Cavitation has potential to be used as a novel way to clean dental implants. This imaging and analysis method will be of value to other researchers and manufacturers wishing to study biofilm growth and removal. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5013386/ /pubmed/27601281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32694 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Vyas, N. Sammons, R. L. Addison, O. Dehghani, H. Walmsley, A. D. A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis |
title | A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis |
title_full | A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis |
title_fullStr | A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis |
title_short | A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis |
title_sort | quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using sem and image analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vyasn aquantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis AT sammonsrl aquantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis AT addisono aquantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis AT dehghanih aquantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis AT walmsleyad aquantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis AT vyasn quantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis AT sammonsrl quantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis AT addisono quantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis AT dehghanih quantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis AT walmsleyad quantitativemethodtomeasurebiofilmremovalefficiencyfromcomplexbiomaterialsurfacesusingsemandimageanalysis |