Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from the Healthlines randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of a telehealth intervention for primary care patients with raised cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. DESIGN: A prospective within-trial patient-level economic evaluation conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Patients recruited...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27566642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012352 |
_version_ | 1782452157936566272 |
---|---|
author | Dixon, Padraig Hollinghurst, Sandra Edwards, Louisa Thomas, Clare Gaunt, Daisy Foster, Alexis Large, Shirley Montgomery, Alan A Salisbury, Chris |
author_facet | Dixon, Padraig Hollinghurst, Sandra Edwards, Louisa Thomas, Clare Gaunt, Daisy Foster, Alexis Large, Shirley Montgomery, Alan A Salisbury, Chris |
author_sort | Dixon, Padraig |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of a telehealth intervention for primary care patients with raised cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. DESIGN: A prospective within-trial patient-level economic evaluation conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Patients recruited through primary care, and intervention delivered via telehealth service. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with a 10-year CVD risk ≥20%, as measured by the QRISK2 algorithm, with at least 1 modifiable risk factor. INTERVENTION: A series of up to 13 scripted, theory-led telehealth encounters with healthcare advisors, who supported participants to make behaviour change, use online resources, optimise medication and improve adherence. Participants in the control arm received usual care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost-effectiveness measured by net monetary benefit at the end of 12 months of follow-up, calculated from incremental cost and incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Productivity impacts, participant out-of-pocket expenditure and the clinical outcome were presented in a cost-consequences framework. RESULTS: 641 participants were randomised—325 to receive the telehealth intervention in addition to usual care and 316 to receive only usual care. 18% of participants had missing data on either costs, utilities or both. Multiple imputation was used for the base case results. The intervention was associated with incremental mean per-patient National Health Service (NHS) costs of £138 (95% CI 66 to 211) and an incremental QALY gain of 0.012 (95% CI −0.001 to 0.026). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £10 859. Net monetary benefit at a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000 per QALY was £116 (95% CI −58 to 291), and the probability that the intervention was cost-effective at this threshold value was 0.77. Similar results were obtained from a complete case analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence to suggest that the Healthlines telehealth intervention was likely to be cost-effective at a threshold of £20 000 per QALY. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN27508731; Results. Prospectively registered 05 July 2012. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5013404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50134042016-09-12 Cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from the Healthlines randomised controlled trial Dixon, Padraig Hollinghurst, Sandra Edwards, Louisa Thomas, Clare Gaunt, Daisy Foster, Alexis Large, Shirley Montgomery, Alan A Salisbury, Chris BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of a telehealth intervention for primary care patients with raised cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. DESIGN: A prospective within-trial patient-level economic evaluation conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Patients recruited through primary care, and intervention delivered via telehealth service. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with a 10-year CVD risk ≥20%, as measured by the QRISK2 algorithm, with at least 1 modifiable risk factor. INTERVENTION: A series of up to 13 scripted, theory-led telehealth encounters with healthcare advisors, who supported participants to make behaviour change, use online resources, optimise medication and improve adherence. Participants in the control arm received usual care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost-effectiveness measured by net monetary benefit at the end of 12 months of follow-up, calculated from incremental cost and incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Productivity impacts, participant out-of-pocket expenditure and the clinical outcome were presented in a cost-consequences framework. RESULTS: 641 participants were randomised—325 to receive the telehealth intervention in addition to usual care and 316 to receive only usual care. 18% of participants had missing data on either costs, utilities or both. Multiple imputation was used for the base case results. The intervention was associated with incremental mean per-patient National Health Service (NHS) costs of £138 (95% CI 66 to 211) and an incremental QALY gain of 0.012 (95% CI −0.001 to 0.026). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £10 859. Net monetary benefit at a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000 per QALY was £116 (95% CI −58 to 291), and the probability that the intervention was cost-effective at this threshold value was 0.77. Similar results were obtained from a complete case analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence to suggest that the Healthlines telehealth intervention was likely to be cost-effective at a threshold of £20 000 per QALY. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN27508731; Results. Prospectively registered 05 July 2012. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5013404/ /pubmed/27566642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012352 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Dixon, Padraig Hollinghurst, Sandra Edwards, Louisa Thomas, Clare Gaunt, Daisy Foster, Alexis Large, Shirley Montgomery, Alan A Salisbury, Chris Cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from the Healthlines randomised controlled trial |
title | Cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from the Healthlines randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from the Healthlines randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from the Healthlines randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from the Healthlines randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from the Healthlines randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from the healthlines randomised controlled trial |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27566642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012352 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dixonpadraig costeffectivenessoftelehealthforpatientswithraisedcardiovasculardiseaseriskevidencefromthehealthlinesrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hollinghurstsandra costeffectivenessoftelehealthforpatientswithraisedcardiovasculardiseaseriskevidencefromthehealthlinesrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT edwardslouisa costeffectivenessoftelehealthforpatientswithraisedcardiovasculardiseaseriskevidencefromthehealthlinesrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thomasclare costeffectivenessoftelehealthforpatientswithraisedcardiovasculardiseaseriskevidencefromthehealthlinesrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gauntdaisy costeffectivenessoftelehealthforpatientswithraisedcardiovasculardiseaseriskevidencefromthehealthlinesrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fosteralexis costeffectivenessoftelehealthforpatientswithraisedcardiovasculardiseaseriskevidencefromthehealthlinesrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT largeshirley costeffectivenessoftelehealthforpatientswithraisedcardiovasculardiseaseriskevidencefromthehealthlinesrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT montgomeryalana costeffectivenessoftelehealthforpatientswithraisedcardiovasculardiseaseriskevidencefromthehealthlinesrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT salisburychris costeffectivenessoftelehealthforpatientswithraisedcardiovasculardiseaseriskevidencefromthehealthlinesrandomisedcontrolledtrial |