Cargando…

Parents' and carers' views about emollients for childhood eczema: qualitative interview study

OBJECTIVE: Leave-on emollients form the mainstay of eczema treatment, but adherence is poor. We aimed to explore parents’/carers' views on effectiveness and acceptability of leave-on emollients for childhood eczema through secondary analysis of data from 2 qualitative data sets. SETTING: Study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santer, M, Muller, I, Yardley, L, Lewis-Jones, S, Ersser, S, Little, P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27543590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011887
_version_ 1782452168059518976
author Santer, M
Muller, I
Yardley, L
Lewis-Jones, S
Ersser, S
Little, P
author_facet Santer, M
Muller, I
Yardley, L
Lewis-Jones, S
Ersser, S
Little, P
author_sort Santer, M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Leave-on emollients form the mainstay of eczema treatment, but adherence is poor. We aimed to explore parents’/carers' views on effectiveness and acceptability of leave-on emollients for childhood eczema through secondary analysis of data from 2 qualitative data sets. SETTING: Study 1 recruited through mail-out from 6 general practices in southern England. Study 2 recruited from a feasibility trial of an intervention to support eczema self-care in 31 practices in the same area. PARTICIPANTS: Study 1 included 28 interviews with carers of children aged ≤5 years with eczema. Study 2 included 26 interviews with carers of children aged ≤5 years with eczema. METHODS: Interviews followed semistructured guides: study 1 explored carers' understandings around eczema treatments in order to develop a web-based self-care support intervention; study 2 explored carers' understandings of eczema and eczema treatments after using the intervention. Interviews were carried out face to face or by telephone, audio-recorded and transcribed. Secondary analysis of data from both studies focused on views and experiences of emollient use. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach facilitated by NVivo V.10 software. RESULTS: In study 1, most participants felt emollients improved eczema but held mixed views about long-term use to prevent flare-ups. In study 2, where carers had used the web-based intervention, all participants held positive views about long-term emollient use. In both studies, participants expressed a range of preferences about emollient ‘thickness’; some felt that ‘thick’ emollients (ointments) were most effective, while others found these difficult to use. Carers described a process of ‘trial and error’, trying emollients suggested by professionals, friends and family, or bought over-the-counter. Carers expressed a need for understanding differences between products and their effective use. CONCLUSIONS: Providing a rationale for long-term emollient use and choice of emollients could help improve adherence and help families gain more rapid control of eczema.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5013451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50134512016-09-12 Parents' and carers' views about emollients for childhood eczema: qualitative interview study Santer, M Muller, I Yardley, L Lewis-Jones, S Ersser, S Little, P BMJ Open Dermatology OBJECTIVE: Leave-on emollients form the mainstay of eczema treatment, but adherence is poor. We aimed to explore parents’/carers' views on effectiveness and acceptability of leave-on emollients for childhood eczema through secondary analysis of data from 2 qualitative data sets. SETTING: Study 1 recruited through mail-out from 6 general practices in southern England. Study 2 recruited from a feasibility trial of an intervention to support eczema self-care in 31 practices in the same area. PARTICIPANTS: Study 1 included 28 interviews with carers of children aged ≤5 years with eczema. Study 2 included 26 interviews with carers of children aged ≤5 years with eczema. METHODS: Interviews followed semistructured guides: study 1 explored carers' understandings around eczema treatments in order to develop a web-based self-care support intervention; study 2 explored carers' understandings of eczema and eczema treatments after using the intervention. Interviews were carried out face to face or by telephone, audio-recorded and transcribed. Secondary analysis of data from both studies focused on views and experiences of emollient use. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach facilitated by NVivo V.10 software. RESULTS: In study 1, most participants felt emollients improved eczema but held mixed views about long-term use to prevent flare-ups. In study 2, where carers had used the web-based intervention, all participants held positive views about long-term emollient use. In both studies, participants expressed a range of preferences about emollient ‘thickness’; some felt that ‘thick’ emollients (ointments) were most effective, while others found these difficult to use. Carers described a process of ‘trial and error’, trying emollients suggested by professionals, friends and family, or bought over-the-counter. Carers expressed a need for understanding differences between products and their effective use. CONCLUSIONS: Providing a rationale for long-term emollient use and choice of emollients could help improve adherence and help families gain more rapid control of eczema. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5013451/ /pubmed/27543590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011887 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Dermatology
Santer, M
Muller, I
Yardley, L
Lewis-Jones, S
Ersser, S
Little, P
Parents' and carers' views about emollients for childhood eczema: qualitative interview study
title Parents' and carers' views about emollients for childhood eczema: qualitative interview study
title_full Parents' and carers' views about emollients for childhood eczema: qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Parents' and carers' views about emollients for childhood eczema: qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Parents' and carers' views about emollients for childhood eczema: qualitative interview study
title_short Parents' and carers' views about emollients for childhood eczema: qualitative interview study
title_sort parents' and carers' views about emollients for childhood eczema: qualitative interview study
topic Dermatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27543590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011887
work_keys_str_mv AT santerm parentsandcarersviewsaboutemollientsforchildhoodeczemaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT mulleri parentsandcarersviewsaboutemollientsforchildhoodeczemaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT yardleyl parentsandcarersviewsaboutemollientsforchildhoodeczemaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT lewisjoness parentsandcarersviewsaboutemollientsforchildhoodeczemaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT erssers parentsandcarersviewsaboutemollientsforchildhoodeczemaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT littlep parentsandcarersviewsaboutemollientsforchildhoodeczemaqualitativeinterviewstudy