Cargando…

Antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in the acute setting under management by an infectious diseases acute physician versus other clinical teams: a cohort study

OBJECTIVES: To assess the magnitude of difference in antibiotic use between clinical teams in the acute setting and assess evidence for any adverse consequences to patient safety or healthcare delivery. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (1 week) and analysis of linked electronic health records (3 yea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fawcett, Nicola JK, Jones, Nicola, Quan, T Phuong, Mistry, Vikash, Crook, Derrick, Peto, Tim, Walker, A Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27554101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010969
_version_ 1782452173408305152
author Fawcett, Nicola JK
Jones, Nicola
Quan, T Phuong
Mistry, Vikash
Crook, Derrick
Peto, Tim
Walker, A Sarah
author_facet Fawcett, Nicola JK
Jones, Nicola
Quan, T Phuong
Mistry, Vikash
Crook, Derrick
Peto, Tim
Walker, A Sarah
author_sort Fawcett, Nicola JK
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the magnitude of difference in antibiotic use between clinical teams in the acute setting and assess evidence for any adverse consequences to patient safety or healthcare delivery. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (1 week) and analysis of linked electronic health records (3 years). SETTING: UK tertiary care centre. PARTICIPANTS: All patients admitted sequentially to the acute medical service under an infectious diseases acute physician (IDP) and other medical teams during 1 week in 2013 (n=297), and 3 years 2012–2014 (n=47 585). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Antibiotic use in days of therapy (DOT): raw group metrics and regression analysis adjusted for case mix. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: 30-day all-cause mortality, treatment failure and length of stay. RESULTS: Antibiotic use was 173 vs 282 DOT/100 admissions in the IDP versus non-IDP group. Using case mix-adjusted zero-inflated Poisson regression, IDP patients were significantly less likely to receive an antibiotic (adjusted OR=0.25 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.84), p=0.03) and received shorter courses (adjusted rate ratio (RR)=0.71 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.93), p=0.01). Clinically stable IDP patients of uncertain diagnosis were more likely to have antibiotics held (87% vs 55%; p=0.02). There was no significant difference in treatment failure or mortality (adjusted p>0.5; also in the 3-year data set), but IDP patients were more likely to be admitted overnight (adjusted OR=3.53 (95% CI 1.24 to 10.03), p=0.03) and have longer length of stay (adjusted RR=1.19 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.36), p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The IDP-led group used 30% less antibiotic therapy with no adverse clinical outcome, suggesting antibiotic use can be reduced safely in the acute setting. This may be achieved in part by holding antibiotics and admitting the patient for observation rather than prescribing, which has implications for costs and hospital occupancy. More information is needed to indicate whether any such longer admission will increase or decrease risk of antibiotic-resistant infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5013476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50134762016-09-12 Antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in the acute setting under management by an infectious diseases acute physician versus other clinical teams: a cohort study Fawcett, Nicola JK Jones, Nicola Quan, T Phuong Mistry, Vikash Crook, Derrick Peto, Tim Walker, A Sarah BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVES: To assess the magnitude of difference in antibiotic use between clinical teams in the acute setting and assess evidence for any adverse consequences to patient safety or healthcare delivery. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (1 week) and analysis of linked electronic health records (3 years). SETTING: UK tertiary care centre. PARTICIPANTS: All patients admitted sequentially to the acute medical service under an infectious diseases acute physician (IDP) and other medical teams during 1 week in 2013 (n=297), and 3 years 2012–2014 (n=47 585). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Antibiotic use in days of therapy (DOT): raw group metrics and regression analysis adjusted for case mix. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: 30-day all-cause mortality, treatment failure and length of stay. RESULTS: Antibiotic use was 173 vs 282 DOT/100 admissions in the IDP versus non-IDP group. Using case mix-adjusted zero-inflated Poisson regression, IDP patients were significantly less likely to receive an antibiotic (adjusted OR=0.25 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.84), p=0.03) and received shorter courses (adjusted rate ratio (RR)=0.71 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.93), p=0.01). Clinically stable IDP patients of uncertain diagnosis were more likely to have antibiotics held (87% vs 55%; p=0.02). There was no significant difference in treatment failure or mortality (adjusted p>0.5; also in the 3-year data set), but IDP patients were more likely to be admitted overnight (adjusted OR=3.53 (95% CI 1.24 to 10.03), p=0.03) and have longer length of stay (adjusted RR=1.19 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.36), p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The IDP-led group used 30% less antibiotic therapy with no adverse clinical outcome, suggesting antibiotic use can be reduced safely in the acute setting. This may be achieved in part by holding antibiotics and admitting the patient for observation rather than prescribing, which has implications for costs and hospital occupancy. More information is needed to indicate whether any such longer admission will increase or decrease risk of antibiotic-resistant infections. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5013476/ /pubmed/27554101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010969 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Fawcett, Nicola JK
Jones, Nicola
Quan, T Phuong
Mistry, Vikash
Crook, Derrick
Peto, Tim
Walker, A Sarah
Antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in the acute setting under management by an infectious diseases acute physician versus other clinical teams: a cohort study
title Antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in the acute setting under management by an infectious diseases acute physician versus other clinical teams: a cohort study
title_full Antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in the acute setting under management by an infectious diseases acute physician versus other clinical teams: a cohort study
title_fullStr Antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in the acute setting under management by an infectious diseases acute physician versus other clinical teams: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in the acute setting under management by an infectious diseases acute physician versus other clinical teams: a cohort study
title_short Antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in the acute setting under management by an infectious diseases acute physician versus other clinical teams: a cohort study
title_sort antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in the acute setting under management by an infectious diseases acute physician versus other clinical teams: a cohort study
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27554101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010969
work_keys_str_mv AT fawcettnicolajk antibioticuseandclinicaloutcomesintheacutesettingundermanagementbyaninfectiousdiseasesacutephysicianversusotherclinicalteamsacohortstudy
AT jonesnicola antibioticuseandclinicaloutcomesintheacutesettingundermanagementbyaninfectiousdiseasesacutephysicianversusotherclinicalteamsacohortstudy
AT quantphuong antibioticuseandclinicaloutcomesintheacutesettingundermanagementbyaninfectiousdiseasesacutephysicianversusotherclinicalteamsacohortstudy
AT mistryvikash antibioticuseandclinicaloutcomesintheacutesettingundermanagementbyaninfectiousdiseasesacutephysicianversusotherclinicalteamsacohortstudy
AT crookderrick antibioticuseandclinicaloutcomesintheacutesettingundermanagementbyaninfectiousdiseasesacutephysicianversusotherclinicalteamsacohortstudy
AT petotim antibioticuseandclinicaloutcomesintheacutesettingundermanagementbyaninfectiousdiseasesacutephysicianversusotherclinicalteamsacohortstudy
AT walkerasarah antibioticuseandclinicaloutcomesintheacutesettingundermanagementbyaninfectiousdiseasesacutephysicianversusotherclinicalteamsacohortstudy