Cargando…
Understanding the relative valuation of research impact: a best–worst scaling experiment of the general public and biomedical and health researchers
OBJECTIVES: (1) To test the use of best–worst scaling (BWS) experiments in valuing different types of biomedical and health research impact, and (2) to explore how different types of research impact are valued by different stakeholder groups. DESIGN: Survey-based BWS experiment and discrete choice m...
Autores principales: | Pollitt, Alexandra, Potoglou, Dimitris, Patil, Sunil, Burge, Peter, Guthrie, Susan, King, Suzanne, Wooding, Steven, Grant, Jonathan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010916 |
Ejemplares similares
-
How long does biomedical research take? Studying the time taken between biomedical and health research and its translation into products, policy, and practice
por: Hanney, Stephen R, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Understanding factors associated with the translation of cardiovascular research: a multinational case study approach
por: Wooding, Steven, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Economies of scale and scope in publicly funded biomedical and health research: evidence from the literature
por: Hernandez-Villafuerte, Karla, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Feasibility of a best–worst scaling exercise to set priorities for autism research
por: Davis, Scott A., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Getting our house in order: an audit of the registration and publication of clinical trials supported by the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and the Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit
por: Tompson, A C, et al.
Publicado: (2016)