Cargando…

Advocacy for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation globally

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an evidence-based intervention recommended for patients with CVD, to prevent recurrent events and to improve quality of life. However, despite the proven benefits, only a small percentag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babu, Abraham Samuel, Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco, Thomas, Randal J., Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee, Herdy, Artur Haddad, Hoch, Jeffrey S., Grace, Sherry L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27600379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1658-1
_version_ 1782452193944666112
author Babu, Abraham Samuel
Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco
Thomas, Randal J.
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
Herdy, Artur Haddad
Hoch, Jeffrey S.
Grace, Sherry L.
author_facet Babu, Abraham Samuel
Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco
Thomas, Randal J.
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
Herdy, Artur Haddad
Hoch, Jeffrey S.
Grace, Sherry L.
author_sort Babu, Abraham Samuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an evidence-based intervention recommended for patients with CVD, to prevent recurrent events and to improve quality of life. However, despite the proven benefits, only a small percentage of those would benefit from CR actually receive it worldwide. This paper by the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation forwards the groundwork for successful CR advocacy to achieve broader reimbursement, and hence implementation. METHODS: First, the results of the International Council’s survey on national CR reimbursement policies by government and insurance companies are summarized. Second, a multi-faceted approach to CR advocacy is forwarded. Finally, as per the advocacy recommendations, the economic impact of CVD and the corresponding benefits of CR and its cost-effectiveness are summarized. This provides the case for CR reimbursement advocacy. RESULTS: Thirty-one responses were received, from 25 different countries: 18 (58.1 %) were from high-income countries, 10 (32.4 %) from upper middle-income, and 3 (9.9 %) from lower middle-income countries. When asked who reimburses at least some portion of CR services in their country, 19 (61.3 %) reported the government, 17 (54.8 %) reported patients pay out-of-pocket, 16 (51.6 %) reported insurance companies, 12 (38.7 %) reported that it is shared between the patient and another source, and 7 (22.6 %) reported another source. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients pay out-of-pocket for CR. CR reimbursement around the world is inconsistent and insufficient. Advocacy campaigns forwarding the CR cause, supported by the relevant literature, enlisting sources of support in a unified manner with an organized plan, are needed, and must be pursued persistently. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1658-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5013580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50135802016-09-08 Advocacy for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation globally Babu, Abraham Samuel Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco Thomas, Randal J. Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee Herdy, Artur Haddad Hoch, Jeffrey S. Grace, Sherry L. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an evidence-based intervention recommended for patients with CVD, to prevent recurrent events and to improve quality of life. However, despite the proven benefits, only a small percentage of those would benefit from CR actually receive it worldwide. This paper by the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation forwards the groundwork for successful CR advocacy to achieve broader reimbursement, and hence implementation. METHODS: First, the results of the International Council’s survey on national CR reimbursement policies by government and insurance companies are summarized. Second, a multi-faceted approach to CR advocacy is forwarded. Finally, as per the advocacy recommendations, the economic impact of CVD and the corresponding benefits of CR and its cost-effectiveness are summarized. This provides the case for CR reimbursement advocacy. RESULTS: Thirty-one responses were received, from 25 different countries: 18 (58.1 %) were from high-income countries, 10 (32.4 %) from upper middle-income, and 3 (9.9 %) from lower middle-income countries. When asked who reimburses at least some portion of CR services in their country, 19 (61.3 %) reported the government, 17 (54.8 %) reported patients pay out-of-pocket, 16 (51.6 %) reported insurance companies, 12 (38.7 %) reported that it is shared between the patient and another source, and 7 (22.6 %) reported another source. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients pay out-of-pocket for CR. CR reimbursement around the world is inconsistent and insufficient. Advocacy campaigns forwarding the CR cause, supported by the relevant literature, enlisting sources of support in a unified manner with an organized plan, are needed, and must be pursued persistently. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1658-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5013580/ /pubmed/27600379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1658-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Babu, Abraham Samuel
Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco
Thomas, Randal J.
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
Herdy, Artur Haddad
Hoch, Jeffrey S.
Grace, Sherry L.
Advocacy for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation globally
title Advocacy for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation globally
title_full Advocacy for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation globally
title_fullStr Advocacy for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation globally
title_full_unstemmed Advocacy for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation globally
title_short Advocacy for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation globally
title_sort advocacy for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation globally
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27600379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1658-1
work_keys_str_mv AT babuabrahamsamuel advocacyforoutpatientcardiacrehabilitationglobally
AT lopezjimenezfrancisco advocacyforoutpatientcardiacrehabilitationglobally
AT thomasrandalj advocacyforoutpatientcardiacrehabilitationglobally
AT isaranuwatchaiwanrudee advocacyforoutpatientcardiacrehabilitationglobally
AT herdyarturhaddad advocacyforoutpatientcardiacrehabilitationglobally
AT hochjeffreys advocacyforoutpatientcardiacrehabilitationglobally
AT gracesherryl advocacyforoutpatientcardiacrehabilitationglobally
AT advocacyforoutpatientcardiacrehabilitationglobally