Cargando…
Comparison of competitive exclusion with classical cleaning and disinfection on bacterial load in pig nursery units
BACKGROUND: Colonisation of the environment of nursery units by pathogenic micro-organisms is an important factor in the persistence and spread of endemic diseases in pigs and zoonotic pathogens. These pathogens are generally controlled by the use of antibiotics and disinfectants. Since an increasin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27600833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0810-9 |
_version_ | 1782452204808962048 |
---|---|
author | Luyckx, K. Millet, S. Van Weyenberg, S. Herman, L. Heyndrickx, M. Dewulf, J. De Reu, K. |
author_facet | Luyckx, K. Millet, S. Van Weyenberg, S. Herman, L. Heyndrickx, M. Dewulf, J. De Reu, K. |
author_sort | Luyckx, K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colonisation of the environment of nursery units by pathogenic micro-organisms is an important factor in the persistence and spread of endemic diseases in pigs and zoonotic pathogens. These pathogens are generally controlled by the use of antibiotics and disinfectants. Since an increasing resistance against these measures has been reported in recent years, methods such as competitive exclusion (CE) are promoted as promising alternatives. RESULTS: This study showed that the infection pressure in CE units after microbial cleaning was not reduced to the same degree as in control units. Despite sufficient administration of probiotic-type spores, the analysed bacteria did not decrease in number after 3 production rounds in CE units, indicating no competitive exclusion. In addition, no differences in feed conversion were found between piglets raised in CE and control units in our study. Also, no differences in faecal consistency (indicator for enteric diseases) was noticed. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the CE protocol is not a valuable alternative for classical C&D. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5013629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50136292016-09-08 Comparison of competitive exclusion with classical cleaning and disinfection on bacterial load in pig nursery units Luyckx, K. Millet, S. Van Weyenberg, S. Herman, L. Heyndrickx, M. Dewulf, J. De Reu, K. BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Colonisation of the environment of nursery units by pathogenic micro-organisms is an important factor in the persistence and spread of endemic diseases in pigs and zoonotic pathogens. These pathogens are generally controlled by the use of antibiotics and disinfectants. Since an increasing resistance against these measures has been reported in recent years, methods such as competitive exclusion (CE) are promoted as promising alternatives. RESULTS: This study showed that the infection pressure in CE units after microbial cleaning was not reduced to the same degree as in control units. Despite sufficient administration of probiotic-type spores, the analysed bacteria did not decrease in number after 3 production rounds in CE units, indicating no competitive exclusion. In addition, no differences in feed conversion were found between piglets raised in CE and control units in our study. Also, no differences in faecal consistency (indicator for enteric diseases) was noticed. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the CE protocol is not a valuable alternative for classical C&D. BioMed Central 2016-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5013629/ /pubmed/27600833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0810-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Luyckx, K. Millet, S. Van Weyenberg, S. Herman, L. Heyndrickx, M. Dewulf, J. De Reu, K. Comparison of competitive exclusion with classical cleaning and disinfection on bacterial load in pig nursery units |
title | Comparison of competitive exclusion with classical cleaning and disinfection on bacterial load in pig nursery units |
title_full | Comparison of competitive exclusion with classical cleaning and disinfection on bacterial load in pig nursery units |
title_fullStr | Comparison of competitive exclusion with classical cleaning and disinfection on bacterial load in pig nursery units |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of competitive exclusion with classical cleaning and disinfection on bacterial load in pig nursery units |
title_short | Comparison of competitive exclusion with classical cleaning and disinfection on bacterial load in pig nursery units |
title_sort | comparison of competitive exclusion with classical cleaning and disinfection on bacterial load in pig nursery units |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27600833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0810-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luyckxk comparisonofcompetitiveexclusionwithclassicalcleaninganddisinfectiononbacterialloadinpignurseryunits AT millets comparisonofcompetitiveexclusionwithclassicalcleaninganddisinfectiononbacterialloadinpignurseryunits AT vanweyenbergs comparisonofcompetitiveexclusionwithclassicalcleaninganddisinfectiononbacterialloadinpignurseryunits AT hermanl comparisonofcompetitiveexclusionwithclassicalcleaninganddisinfectiononbacterialloadinpignurseryunits AT heyndrickxm comparisonofcompetitiveexclusionwithclassicalcleaninganddisinfectiononbacterialloadinpignurseryunits AT dewulfj comparisonofcompetitiveexclusionwithclassicalcleaninganddisinfectiononbacterialloadinpignurseryunits AT dereuk comparisonofcompetitiveexclusionwithclassicalcleaninganddisinfectiononbacterialloadinpignurseryunits |