Cargando…
Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective central review of tumour outlines in patients undergoing radiotherapy in the SCALOP trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The planning CT scans were reviewed retrospectively by a central review team, and the accuracy of investigators’ GTV (iGTV) and PTV (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Scientific Publishers
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27497804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.002 |
_version_ | 1782452226745171968 |
---|---|
author | Fokas, Emmanouil Spezi, Emiliano Patel, Neel Hurt, Chris Nixon, Lisette Chu, Kwun-Ye Staffurth, John Abrams, Ross Mukherjee, Somnath |
author_facet | Fokas, Emmanouil Spezi, Emiliano Patel, Neel Hurt, Chris Nixon, Lisette Chu, Kwun-Ye Staffurth, John Abrams, Ross Mukherjee, Somnath |
author_sort | Fokas, Emmanouil |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective central review of tumour outlines in patients undergoing radiotherapy in the SCALOP trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The planning CT scans were reviewed retrospectively by a central review team, and the accuracy of investigators’ GTV (iGTV) and PTV (iPTV) was compared to the trials team-defined gold standard (gsGTV and gsPTV) using the Jaccard Conformity Index (JCI) and Geographical Miss Index (GMI). The prognostic value of JCI and GMI was also assessed. The RT plans were also reviewed against protocol-defined constraints. RESULTS: 60 patients with diagnostic-quality planning scans were included. The median whole volume JCI for GTV was 0.64 (IQR: 0.43–0.82), and the median GMI was 0.11 (IQR: 0.05–0.22). For PTVs, the median JCI and GMI were 0.80 (IQR: 0.71–0.88) and 0.04 (IQR: 0.02–0.12) respectively. Tumour was completely missed in 1 patient, and ⩾ 50% of the tumour was missed in 3. Patients with JCI for GTV ⩾ 0.7 had 7.12 (95% CIs: 1.83–27.67, p = 0.005) higher odds of progressing by 9 months in multivariate analysis. Major deviations in RT planning were noted in 4.5% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy workshops and real-time central review of contours are required in RT trials of pancreatic cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5013754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier Scientific Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50137542016-09-14 Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial Fokas, Emmanouil Spezi, Emiliano Patel, Neel Hurt, Chris Nixon, Lisette Chu, Kwun-Ye Staffurth, John Abrams, Ross Mukherjee, Somnath Radiother Oncol Target Volume Definition BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective central review of tumour outlines in patients undergoing radiotherapy in the SCALOP trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The planning CT scans were reviewed retrospectively by a central review team, and the accuracy of investigators’ GTV (iGTV) and PTV (iPTV) was compared to the trials team-defined gold standard (gsGTV and gsPTV) using the Jaccard Conformity Index (JCI) and Geographical Miss Index (GMI). The prognostic value of JCI and GMI was also assessed. The RT plans were also reviewed against protocol-defined constraints. RESULTS: 60 patients with diagnostic-quality planning scans were included. The median whole volume JCI for GTV was 0.64 (IQR: 0.43–0.82), and the median GMI was 0.11 (IQR: 0.05–0.22). For PTVs, the median JCI and GMI were 0.80 (IQR: 0.71–0.88) and 0.04 (IQR: 0.02–0.12) respectively. Tumour was completely missed in 1 patient, and ⩾ 50% of the tumour was missed in 3. Patients with JCI for GTV ⩾ 0.7 had 7.12 (95% CIs: 1.83–27.67, p = 0.005) higher odds of progressing by 9 months in multivariate analysis. Major deviations in RT planning were noted in 4.5% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy workshops and real-time central review of contours are required in RT trials of pancreatic cancer. Elsevier Scientific Publishers 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5013754/ /pubmed/27497804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.002 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Target Volume Definition Fokas, Emmanouil Spezi, Emiliano Patel, Neel Hurt, Chris Nixon, Lisette Chu, Kwun-Ye Staffurth, John Abrams, Ross Mukherjee, Somnath Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial |
title | Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial |
title_full | Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial |
title_short | Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial |
title_sort | comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: analysis of the on-trial cases for the scalop trial |
topic | Target Volume Definition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27497804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fokasemmanouil comparisonofinvestigatordelineatedgrosstumourvolumesandqualityassuranceinpancreaticcanceranalysisoftheontrialcasesforthescaloptrial AT speziemiliano comparisonofinvestigatordelineatedgrosstumourvolumesandqualityassuranceinpancreaticcanceranalysisoftheontrialcasesforthescaloptrial AT patelneel comparisonofinvestigatordelineatedgrosstumourvolumesandqualityassuranceinpancreaticcanceranalysisoftheontrialcasesforthescaloptrial AT hurtchris comparisonofinvestigatordelineatedgrosstumourvolumesandqualityassuranceinpancreaticcanceranalysisoftheontrialcasesforthescaloptrial AT nixonlisette comparisonofinvestigatordelineatedgrosstumourvolumesandqualityassuranceinpancreaticcanceranalysisoftheontrialcasesforthescaloptrial AT chukwunye comparisonofinvestigatordelineatedgrosstumourvolumesandqualityassuranceinpancreaticcanceranalysisoftheontrialcasesforthescaloptrial AT staffurthjohn comparisonofinvestigatordelineatedgrosstumourvolumesandqualityassuranceinpancreaticcanceranalysisoftheontrialcasesforthescaloptrial AT abramsross comparisonofinvestigatordelineatedgrosstumourvolumesandqualityassuranceinpancreaticcanceranalysisoftheontrialcasesforthescaloptrial AT mukherjeesomnath comparisonofinvestigatordelineatedgrosstumourvolumesandqualityassuranceinpancreaticcanceranalysisoftheontrialcasesforthescaloptrial |