Cargando…
Cochlear Implants in Subjects Over Age 65: Quality of Life and Audiological Outcomes
BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants (CIs) have been recognized as a safe and effective means for profound hearing loss rehabilitation in children and adults and recently their use has been extended to subjects over 65 years of age. The aim of this paper was to assess indices related to changes in the qual...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27567995 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.896869 |
_version_ | 1782452239439233024 |
---|---|
author | Aimoni, Claudia Ciorba, Andrea Hatzopoulos, Stavros Ramacciotti, Giulia Mazzoli, Manuela Bianchini, Chiara Rosignoli, Monica Skarżyński, Henryk Skarżyński, Piotr H. |
author_facet | Aimoni, Claudia Ciorba, Andrea Hatzopoulos, Stavros Ramacciotti, Giulia Mazzoli, Manuela Bianchini, Chiara Rosignoli, Monica Skarżyński, Henryk Skarżyński, Piotr H. |
author_sort | Aimoni, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants (CIs) have been recognized as a safe and effective means for profound hearing loss rehabilitation in children and adults and recently their use has been extended to subjects over 65 years of age. The aim of this paper was to assess indices related to changes in the quality of life (QoL) in elderly CI recipients. MATERIAL/METHODS: A case-control paradigm was used to assess the effects of CIs on the QoL. Forty-two subjects were assigned to the Case group and 15 subjects to the Control group. All 57 subjects were affected by profound hearing loss and had received a CI. Audiological data were collected from both groups at: (i) 1 month pre-implantation [T1]; (ii) 1 day pre- implantation [T2]; (iii) 30 days post-implantation, with CI used in free field [T3]; and (iv) 12 months post-implantation, with CI used in a free field [T4]. The QoL was assessed via a Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaire, adapted to otolaryngology. To compare subjects across different ages with varying degrees of speech development, a perception parameter was used from the Speech Perception Categories test developed by Geers and Moog. RESULTS: Hearing performance was considerably improved after CI. In relation to the hearing performance at time T1, statistically significant threshold gains were observed in both groups in the T3 and T4 observation windows. At time T4, a threshold gain of 70 dB HL in the Case group and a gain of 84 dB HL in the Control group were observed. With speech therapy rehabilitation, a perception level of 6 was reached by 80.0% of patients in the Case group and by 100% of patients in the Control group. In terms of QoL, both groups showed improved post-CI scores. Statistical differences were observed between the 2 groups, with the Control group outperforming the Case group in all but the social section. CONCLUSIONS: Despite age-related changes in auditory system and prolonged hearing deprivation, CIs offer audiological and QoL benefits in the elderly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5013978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50139782016-09-16 Cochlear Implants in Subjects Over Age 65: Quality of Life and Audiological Outcomes Aimoni, Claudia Ciorba, Andrea Hatzopoulos, Stavros Ramacciotti, Giulia Mazzoli, Manuela Bianchini, Chiara Rosignoli, Monica Skarżyński, Henryk Skarżyński, Piotr H. Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants (CIs) have been recognized as a safe and effective means for profound hearing loss rehabilitation in children and adults and recently their use has been extended to subjects over 65 years of age. The aim of this paper was to assess indices related to changes in the quality of life (QoL) in elderly CI recipients. MATERIAL/METHODS: A case-control paradigm was used to assess the effects of CIs on the QoL. Forty-two subjects were assigned to the Case group and 15 subjects to the Control group. All 57 subjects were affected by profound hearing loss and had received a CI. Audiological data were collected from both groups at: (i) 1 month pre-implantation [T1]; (ii) 1 day pre- implantation [T2]; (iii) 30 days post-implantation, with CI used in free field [T3]; and (iv) 12 months post-implantation, with CI used in a free field [T4]. The QoL was assessed via a Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaire, adapted to otolaryngology. To compare subjects across different ages with varying degrees of speech development, a perception parameter was used from the Speech Perception Categories test developed by Geers and Moog. RESULTS: Hearing performance was considerably improved after CI. In relation to the hearing performance at time T1, statistically significant threshold gains were observed in both groups in the T3 and T4 observation windows. At time T4, a threshold gain of 70 dB HL in the Case group and a gain of 84 dB HL in the Control group were observed. With speech therapy rehabilitation, a perception level of 6 was reached by 80.0% of patients in the Case group and by 100% of patients in the Control group. In terms of QoL, both groups showed improved post-CI scores. Statistical differences were observed between the 2 groups, with the Control group outperforming the Case group in all but the social section. CONCLUSIONS: Despite age-related changes in auditory system and prolonged hearing deprivation, CIs offer audiological and QoL benefits in the elderly. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5013978/ /pubmed/27567995 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.896869 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2016 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Aimoni, Claudia Ciorba, Andrea Hatzopoulos, Stavros Ramacciotti, Giulia Mazzoli, Manuela Bianchini, Chiara Rosignoli, Monica Skarżyński, Henryk Skarżyński, Piotr H. Cochlear Implants in Subjects Over Age 65: Quality of Life and Audiological Outcomes |
title | Cochlear Implants in Subjects Over Age 65: Quality of Life and Audiological Outcomes |
title_full | Cochlear Implants in Subjects Over Age 65: Quality of Life and Audiological Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Cochlear Implants in Subjects Over Age 65: Quality of Life and Audiological Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Cochlear Implants in Subjects Over Age 65: Quality of Life and Audiological Outcomes |
title_short | Cochlear Implants in Subjects Over Age 65: Quality of Life and Audiological Outcomes |
title_sort | cochlear implants in subjects over age 65: quality of life and audiological outcomes |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27567995 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.896869 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aimoniclaudia cochlearimplantsinsubjectsoverage65qualityoflifeandaudiologicaloutcomes AT ciorbaandrea cochlearimplantsinsubjectsoverage65qualityoflifeandaudiologicaloutcomes AT hatzopoulosstavros cochlearimplantsinsubjectsoverage65qualityoflifeandaudiologicaloutcomes AT ramacciottigiulia cochlearimplantsinsubjectsoverage65qualityoflifeandaudiologicaloutcomes AT mazzolimanuela cochlearimplantsinsubjectsoverage65qualityoflifeandaudiologicaloutcomes AT bianchinichiara cochlearimplantsinsubjectsoverage65qualityoflifeandaudiologicaloutcomes AT rosignolimonica cochlearimplantsinsubjectsoverage65qualityoflifeandaudiologicaloutcomes AT skarzynskihenryk cochlearimplantsinsubjectsoverage65qualityoflifeandaudiologicaloutcomes AT skarzynskipiotrh cochlearimplantsinsubjectsoverage65qualityoflifeandaudiologicaloutcomes |