Cargando…
Misoprostol for primary versus secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a cluster‐randomised non‐inferiority community trial
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether secondary prevention, which preemptively treats women with above‐average postpartum bleeding, is non‐inferior to universal prophylaxis. DESIGN: A cluster‐randomised non‐inferiority community trial. SETTING: Health sub‐centres and home deliveries in the Bijapur district o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5014137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26333044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13540 |
_version_ | 1782452251454865408 |
---|---|
author | Raghavan, S Geller, S Miller, S Goudar, SS Anger, H Yadavannavar, MC Dabash, R Bidri, SR Gudadinni, MR Udgiri, R Koch, AR Bellad, MB Winikoff, B |
author_facet | Raghavan, S Geller, S Miller, S Goudar, SS Anger, H Yadavannavar, MC Dabash, R Bidri, SR Gudadinni, MR Udgiri, R Koch, AR Bellad, MB Winikoff, B |
author_sort | Raghavan, S |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess whether secondary prevention, which preemptively treats women with above‐average postpartum bleeding, is non‐inferior to universal prophylaxis. DESIGN: A cluster‐randomised non‐inferiority community trial. SETTING: Health sub‐centres and home deliveries in the Bijapur district of Karnataka, India. POPULATION: Women with low‐risk pregnancies who were eligible for delivery with an Auxiliary Nurse Midwife at home or sub‐centre and who consented to be part of the study. METHODS: Auxiliary Nurse Midwifes were randomised to secondary prevention using 800 mcg sublingual misoprostol administered to women with postpartum blood loss ≥350 ml or to universal prophylaxis using 600 mcg oral misoprostol administered to all women during the third stage of labour. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postpartum haemoglobin ≤7.8 g/dl, mean postpartum blood loss and postpartum haemoglobin, postpartum haemorrhage rate, transfer to higher‐level facilities, acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. RESULTS: Misoprostol was administered to 99.7% of women as primary prevention. In secondary prevention, 92 (4.7%) women had postpartum bleeding ≥350 ml, of which 90 (97.8%) received misoprostol. The proportion of women with postpartum haemoglobin ≤7.8 g/dl was 5.9 and 8.8% in secondary and primary prevention clusters, respectively [difference −2.9%, one‐sided 95% confidence interval (CI) <1.3%]. Postpartum transfer and haemorrhage rates were low (<1%) in both groups. Shivering was more common in primary prevention clusters (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage with misoprostol is non‐inferior to universal prophylaxis based on the primary outcome of postpartum haemoglobin. Secondary prevention could be a good alternative to universal prophylaxis as it medicates fewer women and is an acceptable and feasible strategy at the community level. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage with misoprostol is non‐inferior to universal prophylaxis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5014137 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50141372016-09-20 Misoprostol for primary versus secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a cluster‐randomised non‐inferiority community trial Raghavan, S Geller, S Miller, S Goudar, SS Anger, H Yadavannavar, MC Dabash, R Bidri, SR Gudadinni, MR Udgiri, R Koch, AR Bellad, MB Winikoff, B BJOG Intrapartum Care OBJECTIVE: To assess whether secondary prevention, which preemptively treats women with above‐average postpartum bleeding, is non‐inferior to universal prophylaxis. DESIGN: A cluster‐randomised non‐inferiority community trial. SETTING: Health sub‐centres and home deliveries in the Bijapur district of Karnataka, India. POPULATION: Women with low‐risk pregnancies who were eligible for delivery with an Auxiliary Nurse Midwife at home or sub‐centre and who consented to be part of the study. METHODS: Auxiliary Nurse Midwifes were randomised to secondary prevention using 800 mcg sublingual misoprostol administered to women with postpartum blood loss ≥350 ml or to universal prophylaxis using 600 mcg oral misoprostol administered to all women during the third stage of labour. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postpartum haemoglobin ≤7.8 g/dl, mean postpartum blood loss and postpartum haemoglobin, postpartum haemorrhage rate, transfer to higher‐level facilities, acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. RESULTS: Misoprostol was administered to 99.7% of women as primary prevention. In secondary prevention, 92 (4.7%) women had postpartum bleeding ≥350 ml, of which 90 (97.8%) received misoprostol. The proportion of women with postpartum haemoglobin ≤7.8 g/dl was 5.9 and 8.8% in secondary and primary prevention clusters, respectively [difference −2.9%, one‐sided 95% confidence interval (CI) <1.3%]. Postpartum transfer and haemorrhage rates were low (<1%) in both groups. Shivering was more common in primary prevention clusters (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage with misoprostol is non‐inferior to universal prophylaxis based on the primary outcome of postpartum haemoglobin. Secondary prevention could be a good alternative to universal prophylaxis as it medicates fewer women and is an acceptable and feasible strategy at the community level. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage with misoprostol is non‐inferior to universal prophylaxis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01 2015-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5014137/ /pubmed/26333044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13540 Text en © 2015 The Authors. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Intrapartum Care Raghavan, S Geller, S Miller, S Goudar, SS Anger, H Yadavannavar, MC Dabash, R Bidri, SR Gudadinni, MR Udgiri, R Koch, AR Bellad, MB Winikoff, B Misoprostol for primary versus secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a cluster‐randomised non‐inferiority community trial |
title | Misoprostol for primary versus secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a cluster‐randomised non‐inferiority community trial |
title_full | Misoprostol for primary versus secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a cluster‐randomised non‐inferiority community trial |
title_fullStr | Misoprostol for primary versus secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a cluster‐randomised non‐inferiority community trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Misoprostol for primary versus secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a cluster‐randomised non‐inferiority community trial |
title_short | Misoprostol for primary versus secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a cluster‐randomised non‐inferiority community trial |
title_sort | misoprostol for primary versus secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a cluster‐randomised non‐inferiority community trial |
topic | Intrapartum Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5014137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26333044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raghavans misoprostolforprimaryversussecondarypreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaclusterrandomisednoninferioritycommunitytrial AT gellers misoprostolforprimaryversussecondarypreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaclusterrandomisednoninferioritycommunitytrial AT millers misoprostolforprimaryversussecondarypreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaclusterrandomisednoninferioritycommunitytrial AT goudarss misoprostolforprimaryversussecondarypreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaclusterrandomisednoninferioritycommunitytrial AT angerh misoprostolforprimaryversussecondarypreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaclusterrandomisednoninferioritycommunitytrial AT yadavannavarmc misoprostolforprimaryversussecondarypreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaclusterrandomisednoninferioritycommunitytrial AT dabashr misoprostolforprimaryversussecondarypreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaclusterrandomisednoninferioritycommunitytrial AT bidrisr misoprostolforprimaryversussecondarypreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaclusterrandomisednoninferioritycommunitytrial AT gudadinnimr misoprostolforprimaryversussecondarypreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaclusterrandomisednoninferioritycommunitytrial AT udgirir misoprostolforprimaryversussecondarypreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaclusterrandomisednoninferioritycommunitytrial AT kochar misoprostolforprimaryversussecondarypreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaclusterrandomisednoninferioritycommunitytrial AT belladmb misoprostolforprimaryversussecondarypreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaclusterrandomisednoninferioritycommunitytrial AT winikoffb misoprostolforprimaryversussecondarypreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaclusterrandomisednoninferioritycommunitytrial |