Cargando…

Local field potentials are local events in the mouse auditory cortex

Local field potentials (LFPs) and spikes (SPKs) sampled at the thalamocortical recipient layers represent the inputs from the thalamus and outputs to other layers. Previous studies have shown that SPK‐constructed receptive fields (RF(SPK)) of cortical neurons are much smaller than LFP‐constructed RF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xiuping, Zhou, Linran, Ding, Fangchao, Wang, Yehan, Yan, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5014213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26112462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13003
_version_ 1782452262080086016
author Liu, Xiuping
Zhou, Linran
Ding, Fangchao
Wang, Yehan
Yan, Jun
author_facet Liu, Xiuping
Zhou, Linran
Ding, Fangchao
Wang, Yehan
Yan, Jun
author_sort Liu, Xiuping
collection PubMed
description Local field potentials (LFPs) and spikes (SPKs) sampled at the thalamocortical recipient layers represent the inputs from the thalamus and outputs to other layers. Previous studies have shown that SPK‐constructed receptive fields (RF(SPK)) of cortical neurons are much smaller than LFP‐constructed RFs (RF(LFP)). The difference in cortical RF(LFP) and RF(SPK) is therefore a plausible indication of local networking. The presence of a boarder RF(LFP) appears due to contamination, to some degree, from remote sites. Our studies of the mouse primary auditory cortex show that the best frequencies and minimum thresholds of RF(SPK) and RF(LFP) were similar. We also observed that the RF(LFP) area was only slightly larger than the RF(SPK) area, a very different finding from previous reports. The bandwidth of RF(LFP) was slightly broader than that of RF(SPK) at all levels. These data do not support the explanation that bioelectrical signals from distant sites impact on cortical LFP through volume conduction. That the cortical LFP represents a local event is further supported by comparisons of RF(SPK) and RF(LFP) after cortical inhibition by muscimol and cortical disinhibition by bicuculine. We conclude that the difference between RF(SPK) (output of cortical neurons) and RF(LFP) (input of cortical neurons) results from intracortical processing, including cortical lateral inhibition and excitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5014213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50142132016-09-20 Local field potentials are local events in the mouse auditory cortex Liu, Xiuping Zhou, Linran Ding, Fangchao Wang, Yehan Yan, Jun Eur J Neurosci Neurosystems Local field potentials (LFPs) and spikes (SPKs) sampled at the thalamocortical recipient layers represent the inputs from the thalamus and outputs to other layers. Previous studies have shown that SPK‐constructed receptive fields (RF(SPK)) of cortical neurons are much smaller than LFP‐constructed RFs (RF(LFP)). The difference in cortical RF(LFP) and RF(SPK) is therefore a plausible indication of local networking. The presence of a boarder RF(LFP) appears due to contamination, to some degree, from remote sites. Our studies of the mouse primary auditory cortex show that the best frequencies and minimum thresholds of RF(SPK) and RF(LFP) were similar. We also observed that the RF(LFP) area was only slightly larger than the RF(SPK) area, a very different finding from previous reports. The bandwidth of RF(LFP) was slightly broader than that of RF(SPK) at all levels. These data do not support the explanation that bioelectrical signals from distant sites impact on cortical LFP through volume conduction. That the cortical LFP represents a local event is further supported by comparisons of RF(SPK) and RF(LFP) after cortical inhibition by muscimol and cortical disinhibition by bicuculine. We conclude that the difference between RF(SPK) (output of cortical neurons) and RF(LFP) (input of cortical neurons) results from intracortical processing, including cortical lateral inhibition and excitation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-07-28 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5014213/ /pubmed/26112462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13003 Text en © 2015 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Neurosystems
Liu, Xiuping
Zhou, Linran
Ding, Fangchao
Wang, Yehan
Yan, Jun
Local field potentials are local events in the mouse auditory cortex
title Local field potentials are local events in the mouse auditory cortex
title_full Local field potentials are local events in the mouse auditory cortex
title_fullStr Local field potentials are local events in the mouse auditory cortex
title_full_unstemmed Local field potentials are local events in the mouse auditory cortex
title_short Local field potentials are local events in the mouse auditory cortex
title_sort local field potentials are local events in the mouse auditory cortex
topic Neurosystems
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5014213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26112462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13003
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxiuping localfieldpotentialsarelocaleventsinthemouseauditorycortex
AT zhoulinran localfieldpotentialsarelocaleventsinthemouseauditorycortex
AT dingfangchao localfieldpotentialsarelocaleventsinthemouseauditorycortex
AT wangyehan localfieldpotentialsarelocaleventsinthemouseauditorycortex
AT yanjun localfieldpotentialsarelocaleventsinthemouseauditorycortex