Cargando…

Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity

Neil Armstrong insisted that his quote upon landing on the moon was misheard, and that he had said one small step for a man, instead of one small step for man. What he said is unclear in part because function words like a can be reduced and spectrally indistinguishable from the preceding context. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baese-Berk, Melissa M., Dilley, Laura C., Schmidt, Stephanie, Morrill, Tuuli H., Pitt, Mark A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5014323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27603209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155975
_version_ 1782452274553946112
author Baese-Berk, Melissa M.
Dilley, Laura C.
Schmidt, Stephanie
Morrill, Tuuli H.
Pitt, Mark A.
author_facet Baese-Berk, Melissa M.
Dilley, Laura C.
Schmidt, Stephanie
Morrill, Tuuli H.
Pitt, Mark A.
author_sort Baese-Berk, Melissa M.
collection PubMed
description Neil Armstrong insisted that his quote upon landing on the moon was misheard, and that he had said one small step for a man, instead of one small step for man. What he said is unclear in part because function words like a can be reduced and spectrally indistinguishable from the preceding context. Therefore, their presence can be ambiguous, and they may disappear perceptually depending on the rate of surrounding speech. Two experiments are presented examining production and perception of reduced tokens of for and for a in spontaneous speech. Experiment 1 investigates the distributions of several acoustic features of for and for a. The results suggest that the distributions of for and for a overlap substantially, both in terms of temporal and spectral characteristics. Experiment 2 examines perception of these same tokens when the context speaking rate differs. The perceptibility of the function word a varies as a function of this context speaking rate. These results demonstrate that substantial ambiguity exists in the original quote from Armstrong, and that this ambiguity may be understood through context speaking rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5014323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50143232016-09-27 Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity Baese-Berk, Melissa M. Dilley, Laura C. Schmidt, Stephanie Morrill, Tuuli H. Pitt, Mark A. PLoS One Research Article Neil Armstrong insisted that his quote upon landing on the moon was misheard, and that he had said one small step for a man, instead of one small step for man. What he said is unclear in part because function words like a can be reduced and spectrally indistinguishable from the preceding context. Therefore, their presence can be ambiguous, and they may disappear perceptually depending on the rate of surrounding speech. Two experiments are presented examining production and perception of reduced tokens of for and for a in spontaneous speech. Experiment 1 investigates the distributions of several acoustic features of for and for a. The results suggest that the distributions of for and for a overlap substantially, both in terms of temporal and spectral characteristics. Experiment 2 examines perception of these same tokens when the context speaking rate differs. The perceptibility of the function word a varies as a function of this context speaking rate. These results demonstrate that substantial ambiguity exists in the original quote from Armstrong, and that this ambiguity may be understood through context speaking rate. Public Library of Science 2016-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5014323/ /pubmed/27603209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155975 Text en © 2016 Baese-Berk et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baese-Berk, Melissa M.
Dilley, Laura C.
Schmidt, Stephanie
Morrill, Tuuli H.
Pitt, Mark A.
Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity
title Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity
title_full Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity
title_fullStr Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity
title_short Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity
title_sort revisiting neil armstrongs moon-landing quote: implications for speech perception, function word reduction, and acoustic ambiguity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5014323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27603209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155975
work_keys_str_mv AT baeseberkmelissam revisitingneilarmstrongsmoonlandingquoteimplicationsforspeechperceptionfunctionwordreductionandacousticambiguity
AT dilleylaurac revisitingneilarmstrongsmoonlandingquoteimplicationsforspeechperceptionfunctionwordreductionandacousticambiguity
AT schmidtstephanie revisitingneilarmstrongsmoonlandingquoteimplicationsforspeechperceptionfunctionwordreductionandacousticambiguity
AT morrilltuulih revisitingneilarmstrongsmoonlandingquoteimplicationsforspeechperceptionfunctionwordreductionandacousticambiguity
AT pittmarka revisitingneilarmstrongsmoonlandingquoteimplicationsforspeechperceptionfunctionwordreductionandacousticambiguity