Cargando…
Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity
Neil Armstrong insisted that his quote upon landing on the moon was misheard, and that he had said one small step for a man, instead of one small step for man. What he said is unclear in part because function words like a can be reduced and spectrally indistinguishable from the preceding context. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5014323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27603209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155975 |
_version_ | 1782452274553946112 |
---|---|
author | Baese-Berk, Melissa M. Dilley, Laura C. Schmidt, Stephanie Morrill, Tuuli H. Pitt, Mark A. |
author_facet | Baese-Berk, Melissa M. Dilley, Laura C. Schmidt, Stephanie Morrill, Tuuli H. Pitt, Mark A. |
author_sort | Baese-Berk, Melissa M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neil Armstrong insisted that his quote upon landing on the moon was misheard, and that he had said one small step for a man, instead of one small step for man. What he said is unclear in part because function words like a can be reduced and spectrally indistinguishable from the preceding context. Therefore, their presence can be ambiguous, and they may disappear perceptually depending on the rate of surrounding speech. Two experiments are presented examining production and perception of reduced tokens of for and for a in spontaneous speech. Experiment 1 investigates the distributions of several acoustic features of for and for a. The results suggest that the distributions of for and for a overlap substantially, both in terms of temporal and spectral characteristics. Experiment 2 examines perception of these same tokens when the context speaking rate differs. The perceptibility of the function word a varies as a function of this context speaking rate. These results demonstrate that substantial ambiguity exists in the original quote from Armstrong, and that this ambiguity may be understood through context speaking rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5014323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50143232016-09-27 Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity Baese-Berk, Melissa M. Dilley, Laura C. Schmidt, Stephanie Morrill, Tuuli H. Pitt, Mark A. PLoS One Research Article Neil Armstrong insisted that his quote upon landing on the moon was misheard, and that he had said one small step for a man, instead of one small step for man. What he said is unclear in part because function words like a can be reduced and spectrally indistinguishable from the preceding context. Therefore, their presence can be ambiguous, and they may disappear perceptually depending on the rate of surrounding speech. Two experiments are presented examining production and perception of reduced tokens of for and for a in spontaneous speech. Experiment 1 investigates the distributions of several acoustic features of for and for a. The results suggest that the distributions of for and for a overlap substantially, both in terms of temporal and spectral characteristics. Experiment 2 examines perception of these same tokens when the context speaking rate differs. The perceptibility of the function word a varies as a function of this context speaking rate. These results demonstrate that substantial ambiguity exists in the original quote from Armstrong, and that this ambiguity may be understood through context speaking rate. Public Library of Science 2016-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5014323/ /pubmed/27603209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155975 Text en © 2016 Baese-Berk et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Baese-Berk, Melissa M. Dilley, Laura C. Schmidt, Stephanie Morrill, Tuuli H. Pitt, Mark A. Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity |
title | Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity |
title_full | Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity |
title_fullStr | Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity |
title_full_unstemmed | Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity |
title_short | Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity |
title_sort | revisiting neil armstrongs moon-landing quote: implications for speech perception, function word reduction, and acoustic ambiguity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5014323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27603209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155975 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baeseberkmelissam revisitingneilarmstrongsmoonlandingquoteimplicationsforspeechperceptionfunctionwordreductionandacousticambiguity AT dilleylaurac revisitingneilarmstrongsmoonlandingquoteimplicationsforspeechperceptionfunctionwordreductionandacousticambiguity AT schmidtstephanie revisitingneilarmstrongsmoonlandingquoteimplicationsforspeechperceptionfunctionwordreductionandacousticambiguity AT morrilltuulih revisitingneilarmstrongsmoonlandingquoteimplicationsforspeechperceptionfunctionwordreductionandacousticambiguity AT pittmarka revisitingneilarmstrongsmoonlandingquoteimplicationsforspeechperceptionfunctionwordreductionandacousticambiguity |