Cargando…

Perceptions of cancer treatment decision making among American Indians/Alaska Natives and their physicians

OBJECTIVE: American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) patients are significantly less likely than non‐Hispanic whites to receive guideline‐concordant cancer care. Our objective was to examine cancer treatment decision making among AI/AN patients and their providers. METHODS: From 2011 to 2014, AI/AN canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Arden M., Doorenbos, Ardith Z., Haozous, Emily, Meins, Alexa, Javid, Sara, Flum, David R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5014590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27279001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.4191
_version_ 1782452313782222848
author Morris, Arden M.
Doorenbos, Ardith Z.
Haozous, Emily
Meins, Alexa
Javid, Sara
Flum, David R.
author_facet Morris, Arden M.
Doorenbos, Ardith Z.
Haozous, Emily
Meins, Alexa
Javid, Sara
Flum, David R.
author_sort Morris, Arden M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) patients are significantly less likely than non‐Hispanic whites to receive guideline‐concordant cancer care. Our objective was to examine cancer treatment decision making among AI/AN patients and their providers. METHODS: From 2011 to 2014, AI/AN cancer patients and their surgeons were identified through a hospital registry in Washington State. Patients were invited to participate in a mailed survey that queried socio‐demographics, cultural affiliation, everyday perceived discrimination, and trust in providers. Both patients and surgeons were queried about decision‐making quality (collaboration and satisfaction). The primary outcome was association between patient and provider assessments of decision‐making quality. The secondary outcome was non‐adherence to treatment. RESULTS: Forty‐nine patients (62% response rate) and 14 surgeons (37% response rate) returned surveys. Half of patients had not completed high school; 41% were living in poverty. Half of patients reported a strong tribal affiliation and most reported experiencing some form of discrimination. Patients endorsed high trust in surgeons and a high quality decision‐making process; and surgeons' rated decision‐making quality even more highly than patients did in every domain. Non‐adherence to treatment recommendations was common (26%) and was significantly associated with lower patient‐reported collaboration and satisfaction with decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Given the importance of adherence to cancer treatment for survival, the many non‐clinical reasons for non‐adherence, and the currently demonstrated association between decision‐making quality and adherence, it would be worthwhile to investigate how to increase AI/AN patient satisfaction with decision making and whether improving satisfaction yields improved adherence to the cancer treatment plan. Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Psycho‐Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5014590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50145902016-11-09 Perceptions of cancer treatment decision making among American Indians/Alaska Natives and their physicians Morris, Arden M. Doorenbos, Ardith Z. Haozous, Emily Meins, Alexa Javid, Sara Flum, David R. Psychooncology Papers OBJECTIVE: American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) patients are significantly less likely than non‐Hispanic whites to receive guideline‐concordant cancer care. Our objective was to examine cancer treatment decision making among AI/AN patients and their providers. METHODS: From 2011 to 2014, AI/AN cancer patients and their surgeons were identified through a hospital registry in Washington State. Patients were invited to participate in a mailed survey that queried socio‐demographics, cultural affiliation, everyday perceived discrimination, and trust in providers. Both patients and surgeons were queried about decision‐making quality (collaboration and satisfaction). The primary outcome was association between patient and provider assessments of decision‐making quality. The secondary outcome was non‐adherence to treatment. RESULTS: Forty‐nine patients (62% response rate) and 14 surgeons (37% response rate) returned surveys. Half of patients had not completed high school; 41% were living in poverty. Half of patients reported a strong tribal affiliation and most reported experiencing some form of discrimination. Patients endorsed high trust in surgeons and a high quality decision‐making process; and surgeons' rated decision‐making quality even more highly than patients did in every domain. Non‐adherence to treatment recommendations was common (26%) and was significantly associated with lower patient‐reported collaboration and satisfaction with decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Given the importance of adherence to cancer treatment for survival, the many non‐clinical reasons for non‐adherence, and the currently demonstrated association between decision‐making quality and adherence, it would be worthwhile to investigate how to increase AI/AN patient satisfaction with decision making and whether improving satisfaction yields improved adherence to the cancer treatment plan. Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Psycho‐Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-06 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5014590/ /pubmed/27279001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.4191 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Psycho‐Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Papers
Morris, Arden M.
Doorenbos, Ardith Z.
Haozous, Emily
Meins, Alexa
Javid, Sara
Flum, David R.
Perceptions of cancer treatment decision making among American Indians/Alaska Natives and their physicians
title Perceptions of cancer treatment decision making among American Indians/Alaska Natives and their physicians
title_full Perceptions of cancer treatment decision making among American Indians/Alaska Natives and their physicians
title_fullStr Perceptions of cancer treatment decision making among American Indians/Alaska Natives and their physicians
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of cancer treatment decision making among American Indians/Alaska Natives and their physicians
title_short Perceptions of cancer treatment decision making among American Indians/Alaska Natives and their physicians
title_sort perceptions of cancer treatment decision making among american indians/alaska natives and their physicians
topic Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5014590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27279001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.4191
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisardenm perceptionsofcancertreatmentdecisionmakingamongamericanindiansalaskanativesandtheirphysicians
AT doorenbosardithz perceptionsofcancertreatmentdecisionmakingamongamericanindiansalaskanativesandtheirphysicians
AT haozousemily perceptionsofcancertreatmentdecisionmakingamongamericanindiansalaskanativesandtheirphysicians
AT meinsalexa perceptionsofcancertreatmentdecisionmakingamongamericanindiansalaskanativesandtheirphysicians
AT javidsara perceptionsofcancertreatmentdecisionmakingamongamericanindiansalaskanativesandtheirphysicians
AT flumdavidr perceptionsofcancertreatmentdecisionmakingamongamericanindiansalaskanativesandtheirphysicians