Cargando…

Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND: Work disability is a major personal, financial and public health burden. Predicting future work success is a major focus of research. OBJECTIVES: To identify common prognostic factors for return-to-work across different health and injury conditions and to describe their association with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cancelliere, Carol, Donovan, James, Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen, Biscardi, Melissa, Ammendolia, Carlo, Myburgh, Corrie, Cassidy, J. David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0113-z
_version_ 1782452395936055296
author Cancelliere, Carol
Donovan, James
Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen
Biscardi, Melissa
Ammendolia, Carlo
Myburgh, Corrie
Cassidy, J. David
author_facet Cancelliere, Carol
Donovan, James
Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen
Biscardi, Melissa
Ammendolia, Carlo
Myburgh, Corrie
Cassidy, J. David
author_sort Cancelliere, Carol
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Work disability is a major personal, financial and public health burden. Predicting future work success is a major focus of research. OBJECTIVES: To identify common prognostic factors for return-to-work across different health and injury conditions and to describe their association with return-to-work outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Cinahl, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the grey literature were searched from January 1, 2004 to September 1, 2013. Systematic reviews addressing return-to-work in various conditions and injuries were selected. Eligible studies were critically appraised using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria to identify low risk of bias reviews. RESULTS: Of the 36,193 titles screened and the 94 eligible studies reviewed, 56 systematic reviews were accepted as low risk of bias. Over half of these focused on musculoskeletal disorders, which were primarily spine related (e.g., neck and low back pain). The other half of studies assessed workers with mental health or cardiovascular conditions, stroke, cancer, multiple sclerosis or other non-specified health conditions. Many factors have been assessed, but few consistently across conditions. Common factors associated with positive return-to-work outcomes were higher education and socioeconomic status, higher self-efficacy and optimistic expectations for recovery and return-to-work, lower severity of the injury/illness, return-to-work coordination, and multidisciplinary interventions that include the workplace and stakeholders. Common factors associated with negative return-to-work outcomes were older age, being female, higher pain or disability, depression, higher physical work demands, previous sick leave and unemployment, and activity limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Expectations of recovery and return-to-work, pain and disability levels, depression, workplace factors, and access to multidisciplinary resources are important modifiable factors in progressing return-to-work across health and injury conditions. Employers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders can use this information to facilitate return-to-work for injured/ill workers regardless of the specific injury or illness. Future studies should investigate novel interventions, and other factors that may be common across health conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5015229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50152292016-09-09 Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews Cancelliere, Carol Donovan, James Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen Biscardi, Melissa Ammendolia, Carlo Myburgh, Corrie Cassidy, J. David Chiropr Man Therap Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Work disability is a major personal, financial and public health burden. Predicting future work success is a major focus of research. OBJECTIVES: To identify common prognostic factors for return-to-work across different health and injury conditions and to describe their association with return-to-work outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Cinahl, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the grey literature were searched from January 1, 2004 to September 1, 2013. Systematic reviews addressing return-to-work in various conditions and injuries were selected. Eligible studies were critically appraised using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria to identify low risk of bias reviews. RESULTS: Of the 36,193 titles screened and the 94 eligible studies reviewed, 56 systematic reviews were accepted as low risk of bias. Over half of these focused on musculoskeletal disorders, which were primarily spine related (e.g., neck and low back pain). The other half of studies assessed workers with mental health or cardiovascular conditions, stroke, cancer, multiple sclerosis or other non-specified health conditions. Many factors have been assessed, but few consistently across conditions. Common factors associated with positive return-to-work outcomes were higher education and socioeconomic status, higher self-efficacy and optimistic expectations for recovery and return-to-work, lower severity of the injury/illness, return-to-work coordination, and multidisciplinary interventions that include the workplace and stakeholders. Common factors associated with negative return-to-work outcomes were older age, being female, higher pain or disability, depression, higher physical work demands, previous sick leave and unemployment, and activity limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Expectations of recovery and return-to-work, pain and disability levels, depression, workplace factors, and access to multidisciplinary resources are important modifiable factors in progressing return-to-work across health and injury conditions. Employers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders can use this information to facilitate return-to-work for injured/ill workers regardless of the specific injury or illness. Future studies should investigate novel interventions, and other factors that may be common across health conditions. BioMed Central 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5015229/ /pubmed/27610218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0113-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Cancelliere, Carol
Donovan, James
Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen
Biscardi, Melissa
Ammendolia, Carlo
Myburgh, Corrie
Cassidy, J. David
Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews
title Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews
title_full Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews
title_fullStr Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews
title_short Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews
title_sort factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0113-z
work_keys_str_mv AT cancellierecarol factorsaffectingreturntoworkafterinjuryorillnessbestevidencesynthesisofsystematicreviews
AT donovanjames factorsaffectingreturntoworkafterinjuryorillnessbestevidencesynthesisofsystematicreviews
AT stochkendahlmettejensen factorsaffectingreturntoworkafterinjuryorillnessbestevidencesynthesisofsystematicreviews
AT biscardimelissa factorsaffectingreturntoworkafterinjuryorillnessbestevidencesynthesisofsystematicreviews
AT ammendoliacarlo factorsaffectingreturntoworkafterinjuryorillnessbestevidencesynthesisofsystematicreviews
AT myburghcorrie factorsaffectingreturntoworkafterinjuryorillnessbestevidencesynthesisofsystematicreviews
AT cassidyjdavid factorsaffectingreturntoworkafterinjuryorillnessbestevidencesynthesisofsystematicreviews