Cargando…
Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetes in Iran; a systematic review
OBJECTIVE: To determine the quality of randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) reports in diabetes research in Iran. DESIGN: Systematized review. METHODS: We included RCTs conducted on diabetes mellitus in Iran. Animal studies, educational interventions, and non-randomized trials were excluded. W...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40200-016-0258-2 |
_version_ | 1782452401061494784 |
---|---|
author | Gohari, Faeze Baradaran, Hamid Reza Tabatabaee, Morteza Anijidani, Shabnam Mohammadpour Touserkani, Fatemeh Atlasi, Rasha Razmgir, Maryam |
author_facet | Gohari, Faeze Baradaran, Hamid Reza Tabatabaee, Morteza Anijidani, Shabnam Mohammadpour Touserkani, Fatemeh Atlasi, Rasha Razmgir, Maryam |
author_sort | Gohari, Faeze |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the quality of randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) reports in diabetes research in Iran. DESIGN: Systematized review. METHODS: We included RCTs conducted on diabetes mellitus in Iran. Animal studies, educational interventions, and non-randomized trials were excluded. We excluded duplicated publications reporting the same groups of participants and intervention. Two independent reviewers identify all eligible articles specifically designed data extraction form. We searched through international databases; Scopus, ProQuest, EBSCO, Science Direct, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed; and national databases (In Persian language) such as Magiran, Scientific Information Database (SID) and IranMedex from January 1995 to January of 2013 Two investigators assessed the quality of reporting by CONSORT 2010 (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) checklist statemen.t,. Discrepancies were resolved by third reviewer consulting. RESULTS: One hundred and eight five (185) studies were included and appraised. Half of them (55.7 %) were published in Iranian journals. Most (89.7 %) were parallel RCTs, and being performed on type2 diabetic patients (77.8 %). Less than half of the CONSORT items (43.2 %) were reported in studies, totally. The reporting of randomization and blinding were poor. A few studies 15.1 % mentioned the method of random sequence generation and strategy of allocation concealment. And only 34.8 % of trials report how blinding was applied. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study show that the quality of RCTs conducted in Iran in diabetes research seems suboptimal and the reporting is also incomplete however an increasing trend of improvement can be seen over time. Therefore, it is suggested Iranian researchers pay much more attention to design and methodological quality in conducting and reporting of diabetes RCTs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40200-016-0258-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5015251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50152512016-09-09 Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetes in Iran; a systematic review Gohari, Faeze Baradaran, Hamid Reza Tabatabaee, Morteza Anijidani, Shabnam Mohammadpour Touserkani, Fatemeh Atlasi, Rasha Razmgir, Maryam J Diabetes Metab Disord Review Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the quality of randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) reports in diabetes research in Iran. DESIGN: Systematized review. METHODS: We included RCTs conducted on diabetes mellitus in Iran. Animal studies, educational interventions, and non-randomized trials were excluded. We excluded duplicated publications reporting the same groups of participants and intervention. Two independent reviewers identify all eligible articles specifically designed data extraction form. We searched through international databases; Scopus, ProQuest, EBSCO, Science Direct, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed; and national databases (In Persian language) such as Magiran, Scientific Information Database (SID) and IranMedex from January 1995 to January of 2013 Two investigators assessed the quality of reporting by CONSORT 2010 (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) checklist statemen.t,. Discrepancies were resolved by third reviewer consulting. RESULTS: One hundred and eight five (185) studies were included and appraised. Half of them (55.7 %) were published in Iranian journals. Most (89.7 %) were parallel RCTs, and being performed on type2 diabetic patients (77.8 %). Less than half of the CONSORT items (43.2 %) were reported in studies, totally. The reporting of randomization and blinding were poor. A few studies 15.1 % mentioned the method of random sequence generation and strategy of allocation concealment. And only 34.8 % of trials report how blinding was applied. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study show that the quality of RCTs conducted in Iran in diabetes research seems suboptimal and the reporting is also incomplete however an increasing trend of improvement can be seen over time. Therefore, it is suggested Iranian researchers pay much more attention to design and methodological quality in conducting and reporting of diabetes RCTs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40200-016-0258-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5015251/ /pubmed/27610356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40200-016-0258-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Gohari, Faeze Baradaran, Hamid Reza Tabatabaee, Morteza Anijidani, Shabnam Mohammadpour Touserkani, Fatemeh Atlasi, Rasha Razmgir, Maryam Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetes in Iran; a systematic review |
title | Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetes in Iran; a systematic review |
title_full | Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetes in Iran; a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetes in Iran; a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetes in Iran; a systematic review |
title_short | Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetes in Iran; a systematic review |
title_sort | quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (rcts) in diabetes in iran; a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40200-016-0258-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goharifaeze qualityofreportingrandomizedcontrolledtrialsrctsindiabetesiniranasystematicreview AT baradaranhamidreza qualityofreportingrandomizedcontrolledtrialsrctsindiabetesiniranasystematicreview AT tabatabaeemorteza qualityofreportingrandomizedcontrolledtrialsrctsindiabetesiniranasystematicreview AT anijidanishabnam qualityofreportingrandomizedcontrolledtrialsrctsindiabetesiniranasystematicreview AT mohammadpourtouserkanifatemeh qualityofreportingrandomizedcontrolledtrialsrctsindiabetesiniranasystematicreview AT atlasirasha qualityofreportingrandomizedcontrolledtrialsrctsindiabetesiniranasystematicreview AT razmgirmaryam qualityofreportingrandomizedcontrolledtrialsrctsindiabetesiniranasystematicreview |