Cargando…
Design and Rationale of the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST‐CLI) Trial
BACKGROUND: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is increasing in prevalence, and remains a significant source of mortality and limb loss. The decision to recommend surgical or endovascular revascularization for patients who are candidates for both varies significantly among providers and is driven more by...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27402237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003219 |
_version_ | 1782452427328323584 |
---|---|
author | Menard, Matthew T. Farber, Alik Assmann, Susan F. Choudhry, Niteesh K. Conte, Michael S. Creager, Mark A. Dake, Michael D. Jaff, Michael R. Kaufman, John A. Powell, Richard J. Reid, Diane M. Siami, Flora Sandra Sopko, George White, Christopher J. Rosenfield, Kenneth |
author_facet | Menard, Matthew T. Farber, Alik Assmann, Susan F. Choudhry, Niteesh K. Conte, Michael S. Creager, Mark A. Dake, Michael D. Jaff, Michael R. Kaufman, John A. Powell, Richard J. Reid, Diane M. Siami, Flora Sandra Sopko, George White, Christopher J. Rosenfield, Kenneth |
author_sort | Menard, Matthew T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is increasing in prevalence, and remains a significant source of mortality and limb loss. The decision to recommend surgical or endovascular revascularization for patients who are candidates for both varies significantly among providers and is driven more by individual preference than scientific evidence. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST‐CLI) Trial is a prospective, randomized, multidisciplinary, controlled, superiority trial designed to compare treatment efficacy, functional outcomes, quality of life, and cost in patients undergoing best endovascular or best open surgical revascularization. Approximately 140 clinical sites in the United States and Canada will enroll 2100 patients with CLI who are candidates for both treatment options. A pragmatic trial design requires consensus on patient eligibility by at least 2 investigators, but leaves the choice of specific procedural strategy within the assigned revascularization approach to the individual treating investigator. Patients with suitable single‐segment of saphenous vein available for potential bypass will be randomized within Cohort 1 (n=1620), while patients without will be randomized within Cohort 2 (n=480). The primary efficacy end point of the trial is Major Adverse Limb Event–Free Survival. Key secondary end points include Re‐intervention and Amputation‐Free‐Survival and Amputation Free‐Survival. CONCLUSIONS: The BEST‐CLI trial is the first randomized controlled trial comparing endovascular therapy to open surgical bypass in patients with CLI to be carried out in North America. This landmark comparative effectiveness trial aims to provide Level I data to clarify the appropriate role for both treatment strategies and help define an evidence‐based standard of care for this challenging patient population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT02060630. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5015366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50153662016-09-19 Design and Rationale of the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST‐CLI) Trial Menard, Matthew T. Farber, Alik Assmann, Susan F. Choudhry, Niteesh K. Conte, Michael S. Creager, Mark A. Dake, Michael D. Jaff, Michael R. Kaufman, John A. Powell, Richard J. Reid, Diane M. Siami, Flora Sandra Sopko, George White, Christopher J. Rosenfield, Kenneth J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is increasing in prevalence, and remains a significant source of mortality and limb loss. The decision to recommend surgical or endovascular revascularization for patients who are candidates for both varies significantly among providers and is driven more by individual preference than scientific evidence. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST‐CLI) Trial is a prospective, randomized, multidisciplinary, controlled, superiority trial designed to compare treatment efficacy, functional outcomes, quality of life, and cost in patients undergoing best endovascular or best open surgical revascularization. Approximately 140 clinical sites in the United States and Canada will enroll 2100 patients with CLI who are candidates for both treatment options. A pragmatic trial design requires consensus on patient eligibility by at least 2 investigators, but leaves the choice of specific procedural strategy within the assigned revascularization approach to the individual treating investigator. Patients with suitable single‐segment of saphenous vein available for potential bypass will be randomized within Cohort 1 (n=1620), while patients without will be randomized within Cohort 2 (n=480). The primary efficacy end point of the trial is Major Adverse Limb Event–Free Survival. Key secondary end points include Re‐intervention and Amputation‐Free‐Survival and Amputation Free‐Survival. CONCLUSIONS: The BEST‐CLI trial is the first randomized controlled trial comparing endovascular therapy to open surgical bypass in patients with CLI to be carried out in North America. This landmark comparative effectiveness trial aims to provide Level I data to clarify the appropriate role for both treatment strategies and help define an evidence‐based standard of care for this challenging patient population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT02060630. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5015366/ /pubmed/27402237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003219 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Menard, Matthew T. Farber, Alik Assmann, Susan F. Choudhry, Niteesh K. Conte, Michael S. Creager, Mark A. Dake, Michael D. Jaff, Michael R. Kaufman, John A. Powell, Richard J. Reid, Diane M. Siami, Flora Sandra Sopko, George White, Christopher J. Rosenfield, Kenneth Design and Rationale of the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST‐CLI) Trial |
title | Design and Rationale of the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST‐CLI) Trial |
title_full | Design and Rationale of the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST‐CLI) Trial |
title_fullStr | Design and Rationale of the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST‐CLI) Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Design and Rationale of the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST‐CLI) Trial |
title_short | Design and Rationale of the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST‐CLI) Trial |
title_sort | design and rationale of the best endovascular versus best surgical therapy for patients with critical limb ischemia (best‐cli) trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27402237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003219 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT menardmatthewt designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT farberalik designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT assmannsusanf designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT choudhryniteeshk designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT contemichaels designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT creagermarka designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT dakemichaeld designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT jaffmichaelr designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT kaufmanjohna designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT powellrichardj designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT reiddianem designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT siamiflorasandra designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT sopkogeorge designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT whitechristopherj designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial AT rosenfieldkenneth designandrationaleofthebestendovascularversusbestsurgicaltherapyforpatientswithcriticallimbischemiabestclitrial |