Cargando…

Effect of Varying Hemodynamic and Vascular Conditions on Fractional Flow Reserve: An In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of varying hemodynamic conditions on fractional flow reserve (ratio of pressure distal [P(d)] and proximal [P(a)] to stenosis under hyperemia) in an in vitro setting. Failure to achieve maximal hyperemia and the choice of hyperemic agen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolli, Kranthi K., Min, James K., Ha, Seongmin, Soohoo, Hilary, Xiong, Guanglei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27364988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003634
_version_ 1782452435192643584
author Kolli, Kranthi K.
Min, James K.
Ha, Seongmin
Soohoo, Hilary
Xiong, Guanglei
author_facet Kolli, Kranthi K.
Min, James K.
Ha, Seongmin
Soohoo, Hilary
Xiong, Guanglei
author_sort Kolli, Kranthi K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of varying hemodynamic conditions on fractional flow reserve (ratio of pressure distal [P(d)] and proximal [P(a)] to stenosis under hyperemia) in an in vitro setting. Failure to achieve maximal hyperemia and the choice of hyperemic agents may have differential effects on coronary hemodynamics and, consequently, on the determination of fractional flow reserve. METHODS AND RESULTS: An in vitro flow system was developed to experimentally model the physiological coronary circulation as flow‐dependent stenosis resistance in series with variable downstream resistance. Five idealized models with 30% to 70% diameter stenosis severity were fabricated using VeroClear rigid material in an Objet260 Connex printer. Mean aortic pressure was maintained at 7 levels (60–140 mm Hg) from hypotension to hypertension using a needle valve that mimicked adjustable microcirculatory resistance. A range of physiological flow rates was applied by a steady flow pump and titrated by a flow sensor. The pressure drop and the pressure ratio (P(d)/P(a)) were assessed for the 7 levels of aortic pressure and differing flow rates. The in vitro experimental data were coupled with pressure–flow relationships from clinical data for populations with and without myocardial infarction, respectively, to evaluate fractional flow reserve. The curve for pressure ratio and flow rate demonstrated a quadratic relationship with a decreasing slope. The absolute decrease in fractional flow reserve in the group without myocardial infarction (with myocardial infarction) was on the order of 0.03 (0.02), 0.05 (0.02), 0.07 (0.05), 0.17 (0.13) and 0.20 (0.24), respectively, for 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, and 70% diameter stenosis, for an increase in aortic pressure from 60 to 140 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: The fractional flow reserve value, an index of physiological stenosis significance, was observed to decrease with increasing aortic pressure for a given stenosis in this idealized in vitro experiment for vascular groups with and without myocardial infarction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5015400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50154002016-09-19 Effect of Varying Hemodynamic and Vascular Conditions on Fractional Flow Reserve: An In Vitro Study Kolli, Kranthi K. Min, James K. Ha, Seongmin Soohoo, Hilary Xiong, Guanglei J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of varying hemodynamic conditions on fractional flow reserve (ratio of pressure distal [P(d)] and proximal [P(a)] to stenosis under hyperemia) in an in vitro setting. Failure to achieve maximal hyperemia and the choice of hyperemic agents may have differential effects on coronary hemodynamics and, consequently, on the determination of fractional flow reserve. METHODS AND RESULTS: An in vitro flow system was developed to experimentally model the physiological coronary circulation as flow‐dependent stenosis resistance in series with variable downstream resistance. Five idealized models with 30% to 70% diameter stenosis severity were fabricated using VeroClear rigid material in an Objet260 Connex printer. Mean aortic pressure was maintained at 7 levels (60–140 mm Hg) from hypotension to hypertension using a needle valve that mimicked adjustable microcirculatory resistance. A range of physiological flow rates was applied by a steady flow pump and titrated by a flow sensor. The pressure drop and the pressure ratio (P(d)/P(a)) were assessed for the 7 levels of aortic pressure and differing flow rates. The in vitro experimental data were coupled with pressure–flow relationships from clinical data for populations with and without myocardial infarction, respectively, to evaluate fractional flow reserve. The curve for pressure ratio and flow rate demonstrated a quadratic relationship with a decreasing slope. The absolute decrease in fractional flow reserve in the group without myocardial infarction (with myocardial infarction) was on the order of 0.03 (0.02), 0.05 (0.02), 0.07 (0.05), 0.17 (0.13) and 0.20 (0.24), respectively, for 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, and 70% diameter stenosis, for an increase in aortic pressure from 60 to 140 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: The fractional flow reserve value, an index of physiological stenosis significance, was observed to decrease with increasing aortic pressure for a given stenosis in this idealized in vitro experiment for vascular groups with and without myocardial infarction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5015400/ /pubmed/27364988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003634 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kolli, Kranthi K.
Min, James K.
Ha, Seongmin
Soohoo, Hilary
Xiong, Guanglei
Effect of Varying Hemodynamic and Vascular Conditions on Fractional Flow Reserve: An In Vitro Study
title Effect of Varying Hemodynamic and Vascular Conditions on Fractional Flow Reserve: An In Vitro Study
title_full Effect of Varying Hemodynamic and Vascular Conditions on Fractional Flow Reserve: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Effect of Varying Hemodynamic and Vascular Conditions on Fractional Flow Reserve: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Varying Hemodynamic and Vascular Conditions on Fractional Flow Reserve: An In Vitro Study
title_short Effect of Varying Hemodynamic and Vascular Conditions on Fractional Flow Reserve: An In Vitro Study
title_sort effect of varying hemodynamic and vascular conditions on fractional flow reserve: an in vitro study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27364988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003634
work_keys_str_mv AT kollikranthik effectofvaryinghemodynamicandvascularconditionsonfractionalflowreserveaninvitrostudy
AT minjamesk effectofvaryinghemodynamicandvascularconditionsonfractionalflowreserveaninvitrostudy
AT haseongmin effectofvaryinghemodynamicandvascularconditionsonfractionalflowreserveaninvitrostudy
AT soohoohilary effectofvaryinghemodynamicandvascularconditionsonfractionalflowreserveaninvitrostudy
AT xiongguanglei effectofvaryinghemodynamicandvascularconditionsonfractionalflowreserveaninvitrostudy