Cargando…

Rituximab in the treatment of refractory late acute antibody-mediated rejection: Our initial experience

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is not uncommon after renal transplantation and is harder to handle compared to cell-mediated rejection. When refractory to conventional therapies, rituximab is an attractive option. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of rituximab in refractory late acute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Surendra, M., Raju, S. B., Raju, N., Chandragiri, S., Mukku, K. K., Uppin, M. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795623
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.177207
_version_ 1782452450191474688
author Surendra, M.
Raju, S. B.
Raju, N.
Chandragiri, S.
Mukku, K. K.
Uppin, M. S.
author_facet Surendra, M.
Raju, S. B.
Raju, N.
Chandragiri, S.
Mukku, K. K.
Uppin, M. S.
author_sort Surendra, M.
collection PubMed
description Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is not uncommon after renal transplantation and is harder to handle compared to cell-mediated rejection. When refractory to conventional therapies, rituximab is an attractive option. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of rituximab in refractory late acute AMR. This is a retrospective study involving nine renal transplant recipients. Four doses of rituximab were administered at weekly interval for 4 weeks, at a dose of 375 mg/m(2). The mean age of patients was 35.3 ± 7.38 years. The median period between transplantation and graft dysfunction was 30 ± 20 months. Mean serum creatinine at the time of discharge after transplantation and at the time of acute AMR diagnosis was 1.14 ± 0.19 mg/dl and 2.26 ± 0.57 mg/dl, respectively. After standard therapy, it was 2.68 ± 0.62 mg/dl. One patient died of Pseudomonas sepsis and three patients progressed to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Four biopsies showed significant plasma cell infiltrations. Mean serum creatinine among non-ESRD patients at the end of 1 year progressed from 2.3 ± 0.4 to 3.8 ± 1.2 mg/dl (P value 0.04). eGFR prior to therapy and at the end of 1 year were 34.4 ± 6.18 and 20.8 ± 7.69 ml/min (P value 0.04), respectively. Only one patient showed improvement in graft function in whom donor-specific antibody (DSA) titers showed significant improvement. Rituximab may not be effective in late acute AMR unlike in early acute AMR. Monitoring of DSA has a prognostic role in these patients and plasma cell rich rejection is associated with poor prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5015507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50155072016-10-28 Rituximab in the treatment of refractory late acute antibody-mediated rejection: Our initial experience Surendra, M. Raju, S. B. Raju, N. Chandragiri, S. Mukku, K. K. Uppin, M. S. Indian J Nephrol Original Article Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is not uncommon after renal transplantation and is harder to handle compared to cell-mediated rejection. When refractory to conventional therapies, rituximab is an attractive option. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of rituximab in refractory late acute AMR. This is a retrospective study involving nine renal transplant recipients. Four doses of rituximab were administered at weekly interval for 4 weeks, at a dose of 375 mg/m(2). The mean age of patients was 35.3 ± 7.38 years. The median period between transplantation and graft dysfunction was 30 ± 20 months. Mean serum creatinine at the time of discharge after transplantation and at the time of acute AMR diagnosis was 1.14 ± 0.19 mg/dl and 2.26 ± 0.57 mg/dl, respectively. After standard therapy, it was 2.68 ± 0.62 mg/dl. One patient died of Pseudomonas sepsis and three patients progressed to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Four biopsies showed significant plasma cell infiltrations. Mean serum creatinine among non-ESRD patients at the end of 1 year progressed from 2.3 ± 0.4 to 3.8 ± 1.2 mg/dl (P value 0.04). eGFR prior to therapy and at the end of 1 year were 34.4 ± 6.18 and 20.8 ± 7.69 ml/min (P value 0.04), respectively. Only one patient showed improvement in graft function in whom donor-specific antibody (DSA) titers showed significant improvement. Rituximab may not be effective in late acute AMR unlike in early acute AMR. Monitoring of DSA has a prognostic role in these patients and plasma cell rich rejection is associated with poor prognosis. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5015507/ /pubmed/27795623 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.177207 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Nephrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Surendra, M.
Raju, S. B.
Raju, N.
Chandragiri, S.
Mukku, K. K.
Uppin, M. S.
Rituximab in the treatment of refractory late acute antibody-mediated rejection: Our initial experience
title Rituximab in the treatment of refractory late acute antibody-mediated rejection: Our initial experience
title_full Rituximab in the treatment of refractory late acute antibody-mediated rejection: Our initial experience
title_fullStr Rituximab in the treatment of refractory late acute antibody-mediated rejection: Our initial experience
title_full_unstemmed Rituximab in the treatment of refractory late acute antibody-mediated rejection: Our initial experience
title_short Rituximab in the treatment of refractory late acute antibody-mediated rejection: Our initial experience
title_sort rituximab in the treatment of refractory late acute antibody-mediated rejection: our initial experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795623
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.177207
work_keys_str_mv AT surendram rituximabinthetreatmentofrefractorylateacuteantibodymediatedrejectionourinitialexperience
AT rajusb rituximabinthetreatmentofrefractorylateacuteantibodymediatedrejectionourinitialexperience
AT rajun rituximabinthetreatmentofrefractorylateacuteantibodymediatedrejectionourinitialexperience
AT chandragiris rituximabinthetreatmentofrefractorylateacuteantibodymediatedrejectionourinitialexperience
AT mukkukk rituximabinthetreatmentofrefractorylateacuteantibodymediatedrejectionourinitialexperience
AT uppinms rituximabinthetreatmentofrefractorylateacuteantibodymediatedrejectionourinitialexperience