Cargando…

Outcome Indicators on Interprofessional Collaboration Interventions for Elderly

BACKGROUND: Geriatric care increasingly needs more multidisciplinary health care services to deliver the necessary complex and continuous care. The aim of this study is to summarize indicators of effective interprofessional outcomes for this population. METHOD: A systematic review is performed in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsakitzidis, Giannoula, Timmermans, Olaf, Callewaert, Nadine, Verhoeven, Veronique, Lopez-Hartmann, Maja, Truijen, Steven, Meulemans, Herman, Van Royen, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27616961
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2017
_version_ 1782452459833131008
author Tsakitzidis, Giannoula
Timmermans, Olaf
Callewaert, Nadine
Verhoeven, Veronique
Lopez-Hartmann, Maja
Truijen, Steven
Meulemans, Herman
Van Royen, Paul
author_facet Tsakitzidis, Giannoula
Timmermans, Olaf
Callewaert, Nadine
Verhoeven, Veronique
Lopez-Hartmann, Maja
Truijen, Steven
Meulemans, Herman
Van Royen, Paul
author_sort Tsakitzidis, Giannoula
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Geriatric care increasingly needs more multidisciplinary health care services to deliver the necessary complex and continuous care. The aim of this study is to summarize indicators of effective interprofessional outcomes for this population. METHOD: A systematic review is performed in the Cochrane Library, Pubmed (Medline), Embase, Cinahl and Psychinfo with a search until June 2014. RESULTS: Overall, 689 references were identified of which 29 studies met the inclusion criteria. All outcome indicators were summarized in three categories: collaboration, patient level outcome and costs. Seventeen out of 24 outcome indicators within the category of ‘collaboration’ reached significant difference in advantage of the intervention group. On ‘patient outcome level’ only 15 out of 32 outcome parameters met statistical significance. In the category of ‘costs’ only one study reached statistical significance. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The overall effects of interprofessional interventions for elderly are positive, but based on heterogeneous outcomes. Outcome indicators of interprofessional collaboration for elderly with a significant effect can be summarized in three main categories: ‘collaboration’, patient level’ and ‘costs’. For ‘collaboration’ the outcome indicators are key elements of collaboration, involved disciplines, professional and patient satisfaction and quality of care. On ‘patient level’ the outcome indicators are pain, fall incidence, quality of life, independence for daily life activities, depression and agitated behaviour, transitions, length of stay in hospital, mortality and period of rehabilitation. ‘Costs’ of interprofessional interventions on short- and long-term for elderly need further investigation. When organizing interprofessional collaboration or interprofessional education these outcome indicators can be considered as important topics to be addressed. Overall more research is needed to gain insight in the process of interprofessional collaboration and so to learn to work interprofessionally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5015552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50155522016-09-09 Outcome Indicators on Interprofessional Collaboration Interventions for Elderly Tsakitzidis, Giannoula Timmermans, Olaf Callewaert, Nadine Verhoeven, Veronique Lopez-Hartmann, Maja Truijen, Steven Meulemans, Herman Van Royen, Paul Int J Integr Care Research and Theory BACKGROUND: Geriatric care increasingly needs more multidisciplinary health care services to deliver the necessary complex and continuous care. The aim of this study is to summarize indicators of effective interprofessional outcomes for this population. METHOD: A systematic review is performed in the Cochrane Library, Pubmed (Medline), Embase, Cinahl and Psychinfo with a search until June 2014. RESULTS: Overall, 689 references were identified of which 29 studies met the inclusion criteria. All outcome indicators were summarized in three categories: collaboration, patient level outcome and costs. Seventeen out of 24 outcome indicators within the category of ‘collaboration’ reached significant difference in advantage of the intervention group. On ‘patient outcome level’ only 15 out of 32 outcome parameters met statistical significance. In the category of ‘costs’ only one study reached statistical significance. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The overall effects of interprofessional interventions for elderly are positive, but based on heterogeneous outcomes. Outcome indicators of interprofessional collaboration for elderly with a significant effect can be summarized in three main categories: ‘collaboration’, patient level’ and ‘costs’. For ‘collaboration’ the outcome indicators are key elements of collaboration, involved disciplines, professional and patient satisfaction and quality of care. On ‘patient level’ the outcome indicators are pain, fall incidence, quality of life, independence for daily life activities, depression and agitated behaviour, transitions, length of stay in hospital, mortality and period of rehabilitation. ‘Costs’ of interprofessional interventions on short- and long-term for elderly need further investigation. When organizing interprofessional collaboration or interprofessional education these outcome indicators can be considered as important topics to be addressed. Overall more research is needed to gain insight in the process of interprofessional collaboration and so to learn to work interprofessionally. Ubiquity Press 2016-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5015552/ /pubmed/27616961 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2017 Text en Copyright: © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research and Theory
Tsakitzidis, Giannoula
Timmermans, Olaf
Callewaert, Nadine
Verhoeven, Veronique
Lopez-Hartmann, Maja
Truijen, Steven
Meulemans, Herman
Van Royen, Paul
Outcome Indicators on Interprofessional Collaboration Interventions for Elderly
title Outcome Indicators on Interprofessional Collaboration Interventions for Elderly
title_full Outcome Indicators on Interprofessional Collaboration Interventions for Elderly
title_fullStr Outcome Indicators on Interprofessional Collaboration Interventions for Elderly
title_full_unstemmed Outcome Indicators on Interprofessional Collaboration Interventions for Elderly
title_short Outcome Indicators on Interprofessional Collaboration Interventions for Elderly
title_sort outcome indicators on interprofessional collaboration interventions for elderly
topic Research and Theory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27616961
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2017
work_keys_str_mv AT tsakitzidisgiannoula outcomeindicatorsoninterprofessionalcollaborationinterventionsforelderly
AT timmermansolaf outcomeindicatorsoninterprofessionalcollaborationinterventionsforelderly
AT callewaertnadine outcomeindicatorsoninterprofessionalcollaborationinterventionsforelderly
AT verhoevenveronique outcomeindicatorsoninterprofessionalcollaborationinterventionsforelderly
AT lopezhartmannmaja outcomeindicatorsoninterprofessionalcollaborationinterventionsforelderly
AT truijensteven outcomeindicatorsoninterprofessionalcollaborationinterventionsforelderly
AT meulemansherman outcomeindicatorsoninterprofessionalcollaborationinterventionsforelderly
AT vanroyenpaul outcomeindicatorsoninterprofessionalcollaborationinterventionsforelderly