Cargando…
Improving communication between phlebotomists and doctors: a quality improvement project
Blood tests are a seemingly basic investigation, but are often a vital part of directing patient management. Despite the importance of this everyday process, we indentified the potential for improvement of the current phlebotomy service in our hospital, as both junior doctors and phlebotomists repor...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u206305.w4089 |
_version_ | 1782452488234860544 |
---|---|
author | Saunsbury, Emma Howarth, Gabrielle |
author_facet | Saunsbury, Emma Howarth, Gabrielle |
author_sort | Saunsbury, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Blood tests are a seemingly basic investigation, but are often a vital part of directing patient management. Despite the importance of this everyday process, we indentified the potential for improvement of the current phlebotomy service in our hospital, as both junior doctors and phlebotomists reported a lack of communication and standardised practice across the wards. Resulting delays in obtaining blood test results can impact detrimentally on patient safety and management. We designed a survey which highlighted inefficient handovers and discrepancies between wards as driving factors behind this. We therefore aimed to improve communication between phlebotomists and doctors, as well as the overall organisation of the service. This took the form of the “Phlebotomy Box,” a box file system offering a set location for blood stickers to be situated. The box concept was optimised on a series of medical and surgical wards, incorporating multidisciplinary feedback from relevant teams. We measured how many untaken bloods were handed over to medical staff continuously, both pre- and post implementation of the phlebotomy box. Our baseline ward demonstrated poor handover rates of untaken bloods, ranging from 0% to 40%. This increased to a consistent 100% following introduction of the Phlebotomy Box and ongoing staff education. Once optimised, the box was trialled on a further two medical wards and one surgical ward, achieving 100% handover from an initial 0% to 67%. Quantitative improvement was also reflected qualitatively in widespread staff surveys, with overwhelmingly positive support and acceptance. In summary, the Phlebotomy Box innovation has led to 100% of untaken bloods being effectively handed over. We have demonstrated a significant improvement in communication and efficiency within the phlebotomy service, with tangible benefits to patient care, as minimising time lags can prevent delays in clinical decisions. The phlebotomy box represents a simplistic, sustainable intervention that could be easily replicated in other Trusts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5015820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | British Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50158202016-09-20 Improving communication between phlebotomists and doctors: a quality improvement project Saunsbury, Emma Howarth, Gabrielle BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Blood tests are a seemingly basic investigation, but are often a vital part of directing patient management. Despite the importance of this everyday process, we indentified the potential for improvement of the current phlebotomy service in our hospital, as both junior doctors and phlebotomists reported a lack of communication and standardised practice across the wards. Resulting delays in obtaining blood test results can impact detrimentally on patient safety and management. We designed a survey which highlighted inefficient handovers and discrepancies between wards as driving factors behind this. We therefore aimed to improve communication between phlebotomists and doctors, as well as the overall organisation of the service. This took the form of the “Phlebotomy Box,” a box file system offering a set location for blood stickers to be situated. The box concept was optimised on a series of medical and surgical wards, incorporating multidisciplinary feedback from relevant teams. We measured how many untaken bloods were handed over to medical staff continuously, both pre- and post implementation of the phlebotomy box. Our baseline ward demonstrated poor handover rates of untaken bloods, ranging from 0% to 40%. This increased to a consistent 100% following introduction of the Phlebotomy Box and ongoing staff education. Once optimised, the box was trialled on a further two medical wards and one surgical ward, achieving 100% handover from an initial 0% to 67%. Quantitative improvement was also reflected qualitatively in widespread staff surveys, with overwhelmingly positive support and acceptance. In summary, the Phlebotomy Box innovation has led to 100% of untaken bloods being effectively handed over. We have demonstrated a significant improvement in communication and efficiency within the phlebotomy service, with tangible benefits to patient care, as minimising time lags can prevent delays in clinical decisions. The phlebotomy box represents a simplistic, sustainable intervention that could be easily replicated in other Trusts. British Publishing Group 2016-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5015820/ /pubmed/27651898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u206305.w4089 Text en © 2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Saunsbury, Emma Howarth, Gabrielle Improving communication between phlebotomists and doctors: a quality improvement project |
title | Improving communication between phlebotomists and doctors: a quality improvement project |
title_full | Improving communication between phlebotomists and doctors: a quality improvement project |
title_fullStr | Improving communication between phlebotomists and doctors: a quality improvement project |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving communication between phlebotomists and doctors: a quality improvement project |
title_short | Improving communication between phlebotomists and doctors: a quality improvement project |
title_sort | improving communication between phlebotomists and doctors: a quality improvement project |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u206305.w4089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saunsburyemma improvingcommunicationbetweenphlebotomistsanddoctorsaqualityimprovementproject AT howarthgabrielle improvingcommunicationbetweenphlebotomistsanddoctorsaqualityimprovementproject |