Cargando…

Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can entrain ongoing brain oscillations and modulate the motor system in a frequency-dependent manner. Recent animal studies have demonstrated that the phase of a sinusoidal current also has an important role in modulation of neuronal activity. Howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakazono, Hisato, Ogata, Katsuya, Kuroda, Tsuyoshi, Tobimatsu, Shozo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27607431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162521
_version_ 1782452494624882688
author Nakazono, Hisato
Ogata, Katsuya
Kuroda, Tsuyoshi
Tobimatsu, Shozo
author_facet Nakazono, Hisato
Ogata, Katsuya
Kuroda, Tsuyoshi
Tobimatsu, Shozo
author_sort Nakazono, Hisato
collection PubMed
description Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can entrain ongoing brain oscillations and modulate the motor system in a frequency-dependent manner. Recent animal studies have demonstrated that the phase of a sinusoidal current also has an important role in modulation of neuronal activity. However, the phase effects of tACS on the human motor system are largely unknown. Here, we systematically investigated the effects of tACS phase and frequency on the primary motor cortex (M1) by using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). First, we compared the phase effects (90°, 180°, 270° or 360°) of 10 and 20 Hz tACS on MEPs. The 20 Hz tACS significantly increased M1 excitability compared with the 10 Hz tACS at 90° phase only. Second, we studied the 90° phase effect on MEPs at different tACS frequencies (5, 10, 20 or 40 Hz). The 20 vs. 10 Hz difference was again observed, but the 90° phase in 5 and 40 Hz tACS did not influence M1 excitability. Third, the 90° phase effects of 10 and 20 Hz tACS were compared with sham stimulation. The 90° phase of 20 Hz tACS enhanced MEP amplitudes compared with sham stimulation, but there was no significant effect of 10 Hz tACS. Taken together, we assume that the differential 90° phase effects on 20 Hz and 10 Hz tACS can be attributed to the neural synchronization modulated by tACS. Our results further underline that phase and frequency are the important factors in the effects of tACS on M1 excitability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5015848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50158482016-09-27 Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability Nakazono, Hisato Ogata, Katsuya Kuroda, Tsuyoshi Tobimatsu, Shozo PLoS One Research Article Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can entrain ongoing brain oscillations and modulate the motor system in a frequency-dependent manner. Recent animal studies have demonstrated that the phase of a sinusoidal current also has an important role in modulation of neuronal activity. However, the phase effects of tACS on the human motor system are largely unknown. Here, we systematically investigated the effects of tACS phase and frequency on the primary motor cortex (M1) by using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). First, we compared the phase effects (90°, 180°, 270° or 360°) of 10 and 20 Hz tACS on MEPs. The 20 Hz tACS significantly increased M1 excitability compared with the 10 Hz tACS at 90° phase only. Second, we studied the 90° phase effect on MEPs at different tACS frequencies (5, 10, 20 or 40 Hz). The 20 vs. 10 Hz difference was again observed, but the 90° phase in 5 and 40 Hz tACS did not influence M1 excitability. Third, the 90° phase effects of 10 and 20 Hz tACS were compared with sham stimulation. The 90° phase of 20 Hz tACS enhanced MEP amplitudes compared with sham stimulation, but there was no significant effect of 10 Hz tACS. Taken together, we assume that the differential 90° phase effects on 20 Hz and 10 Hz tACS can be attributed to the neural synchronization modulated by tACS. Our results further underline that phase and frequency are the important factors in the effects of tACS on M1 excitability. Public Library of Science 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5015848/ /pubmed/27607431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162521 Text en © 2016 Nakazono et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nakazono, Hisato
Ogata, Katsuya
Kuroda, Tsuyoshi
Tobimatsu, Shozo
Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability
title Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability
title_full Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability
title_fullStr Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability
title_full_unstemmed Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability
title_short Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability
title_sort phase and frequency-dependent effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on motor cortical excitability
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27607431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162521
work_keys_str_mv AT nakazonohisato phaseandfrequencydependenteffectsoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcorticalexcitability
AT ogatakatsuya phaseandfrequencydependenteffectsoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcorticalexcitability
AT kurodatsuyoshi phaseandfrequencydependenteffectsoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcorticalexcitability
AT tobimatsushozo phaseandfrequencydependenteffectsoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcorticalexcitability