Cargando…
Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can entrain ongoing brain oscillations and modulate the motor system in a frequency-dependent manner. Recent animal studies have demonstrated that the phase of a sinusoidal current also has an important role in modulation of neuronal activity. Howe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27607431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162521 |
_version_ | 1782452494624882688 |
---|---|
author | Nakazono, Hisato Ogata, Katsuya Kuroda, Tsuyoshi Tobimatsu, Shozo |
author_facet | Nakazono, Hisato Ogata, Katsuya Kuroda, Tsuyoshi Tobimatsu, Shozo |
author_sort | Nakazono, Hisato |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can entrain ongoing brain oscillations and modulate the motor system in a frequency-dependent manner. Recent animal studies have demonstrated that the phase of a sinusoidal current also has an important role in modulation of neuronal activity. However, the phase effects of tACS on the human motor system are largely unknown. Here, we systematically investigated the effects of tACS phase and frequency on the primary motor cortex (M1) by using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). First, we compared the phase effects (90°, 180°, 270° or 360°) of 10 and 20 Hz tACS on MEPs. The 20 Hz tACS significantly increased M1 excitability compared with the 10 Hz tACS at 90° phase only. Second, we studied the 90° phase effect on MEPs at different tACS frequencies (5, 10, 20 or 40 Hz). The 20 vs. 10 Hz difference was again observed, but the 90° phase in 5 and 40 Hz tACS did not influence M1 excitability. Third, the 90° phase effects of 10 and 20 Hz tACS were compared with sham stimulation. The 90° phase of 20 Hz tACS enhanced MEP amplitudes compared with sham stimulation, but there was no significant effect of 10 Hz tACS. Taken together, we assume that the differential 90° phase effects on 20 Hz and 10 Hz tACS can be attributed to the neural synchronization modulated by tACS. Our results further underline that phase and frequency are the important factors in the effects of tACS on M1 excitability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5015848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50158482016-09-27 Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability Nakazono, Hisato Ogata, Katsuya Kuroda, Tsuyoshi Tobimatsu, Shozo PLoS One Research Article Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can entrain ongoing brain oscillations and modulate the motor system in a frequency-dependent manner. Recent animal studies have demonstrated that the phase of a sinusoidal current also has an important role in modulation of neuronal activity. However, the phase effects of tACS on the human motor system are largely unknown. Here, we systematically investigated the effects of tACS phase and frequency on the primary motor cortex (M1) by using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). First, we compared the phase effects (90°, 180°, 270° or 360°) of 10 and 20 Hz tACS on MEPs. The 20 Hz tACS significantly increased M1 excitability compared with the 10 Hz tACS at 90° phase only. Second, we studied the 90° phase effect on MEPs at different tACS frequencies (5, 10, 20 or 40 Hz). The 20 vs. 10 Hz difference was again observed, but the 90° phase in 5 and 40 Hz tACS did not influence M1 excitability. Third, the 90° phase effects of 10 and 20 Hz tACS were compared with sham stimulation. The 90° phase of 20 Hz tACS enhanced MEP amplitudes compared with sham stimulation, but there was no significant effect of 10 Hz tACS. Taken together, we assume that the differential 90° phase effects on 20 Hz and 10 Hz tACS can be attributed to the neural synchronization modulated by tACS. Our results further underline that phase and frequency are the important factors in the effects of tACS on M1 excitability. Public Library of Science 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5015848/ /pubmed/27607431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162521 Text en © 2016 Nakazono et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nakazono, Hisato Ogata, Katsuya Kuroda, Tsuyoshi Tobimatsu, Shozo Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability |
title | Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability |
title_full | Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability |
title_fullStr | Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability |
title_short | Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability |
title_sort | phase and frequency-dependent effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on motor cortical excitability |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27607431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162521 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakazonohisato phaseandfrequencydependenteffectsoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcorticalexcitability AT ogatakatsuya phaseandfrequencydependenteffectsoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcorticalexcitability AT kurodatsuyoshi phaseandfrequencydependenteffectsoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcorticalexcitability AT tobimatsushozo phaseandfrequencydependenteffectsoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcorticalexcitability |