Cargando…

Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases

BACKGROUND: Solitary pink lesions in differential diagnosis with hypopigmented/amelanotic melanoma present a diagnostic challenge in daily practice and are regularly referred for second expert opinion. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) has been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Łudzik, J., Witkowski, A. M., Roterman-Konieczna, I., Bassoli, S., Farnetani, F., Pellacani, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27606812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162495
_version_ 1782452496889806848
author Łudzik, J.
Witkowski, A. M.
Roterman-Konieczna, I.
Bassoli, S.
Farnetani, F.
Pellacani, G.
author_facet Łudzik, J.
Witkowski, A. M.
Roterman-Konieczna, I.
Bassoli, S.
Farnetani, F.
Pellacani, G.
author_sort Łudzik, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Solitary pink lesions in differential diagnosis with hypopigmented/amelanotic melanoma present a diagnostic challenge in daily practice and are regularly referred for second expert opinion. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) has been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopically equivocal pink lesions. No studies have been performed to evaluate the effect of adding a second expert reader and automatic removal of lesions with discordant management recommendations and its potential effect on diagnostic sensitivity and final management of these lesions in retrospective or telemedicine settings. OBJECTIVE: To improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce potential mismanagement of dermoscopically equivocal pink cutaneous lesions by implementing double reader concordance evaluation of RCM images. METHODS: 316 dermoscopically equivocal pink lesions with dermoscopy-RCM image sets were evaluated retrospectively. Accuracy of three readers was evaluated by single reader evaluation of dermoscopy only and dermoscopy-RCM image sets and finally by double reader evaluation of dermoscopy-RCM image sets. Lesions with discordant diagnosis between two readers were automatically recommended for excision. RESULTS: Dermoscopy only evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 95.9% and specificity of 33.6%, with 1 of 12 amelanotic melanomas mismanaged. Dermoscopy-RCM image set single reader evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 93.9% and overall specificity of 54.2%, with 1 of 12 melanomas mismanaged. Dermoscopy-RCM image set double reader concordance evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 98.3% and specificity of 42.7%, with no amelanotic melanoma mismanagement. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of dermoscopy-RCM image sets of equivocal pink lesions by a single reader in telemedicine settings is limited by the potential for misdiagnosis of dangerous malignant lesions. Double reader concordance evaluation with automatic referral of lesions for removal in the case of discordant diagnosis improves the diagnostic sensitivity in this subset of lesions and reduce potential misdiagnosis in settings where a second expert opinion may be employed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5015858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50158582016-09-27 Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases Łudzik, J. Witkowski, A. M. Roterman-Konieczna, I. Bassoli, S. Farnetani, F. Pellacani, G. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Solitary pink lesions in differential diagnosis with hypopigmented/amelanotic melanoma present a diagnostic challenge in daily practice and are regularly referred for second expert opinion. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) has been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopically equivocal pink lesions. No studies have been performed to evaluate the effect of adding a second expert reader and automatic removal of lesions with discordant management recommendations and its potential effect on diagnostic sensitivity and final management of these lesions in retrospective or telemedicine settings. OBJECTIVE: To improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce potential mismanagement of dermoscopically equivocal pink cutaneous lesions by implementing double reader concordance evaluation of RCM images. METHODS: 316 dermoscopically equivocal pink lesions with dermoscopy-RCM image sets were evaluated retrospectively. Accuracy of three readers was evaluated by single reader evaluation of dermoscopy only and dermoscopy-RCM image sets and finally by double reader evaluation of dermoscopy-RCM image sets. Lesions with discordant diagnosis between two readers were automatically recommended for excision. RESULTS: Dermoscopy only evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 95.9% and specificity of 33.6%, with 1 of 12 amelanotic melanomas mismanaged. Dermoscopy-RCM image set single reader evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 93.9% and overall specificity of 54.2%, with 1 of 12 melanomas mismanaged. Dermoscopy-RCM image set double reader concordance evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 98.3% and specificity of 42.7%, with no amelanotic melanoma mismanagement. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of dermoscopy-RCM image sets of equivocal pink lesions by a single reader in telemedicine settings is limited by the potential for misdiagnosis of dangerous malignant lesions. Double reader concordance evaluation with automatic referral of lesions for removal in the case of discordant diagnosis improves the diagnostic sensitivity in this subset of lesions and reduce potential misdiagnosis in settings where a second expert opinion may be employed. Public Library of Science 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5015858/ /pubmed/27606812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162495 Text en © 2016 Łudzik et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Łudzik, J.
Witkowski, A. M.
Roterman-Konieczna, I.
Bassoli, S.
Farnetani, F.
Pellacani, G.
Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases
title Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases
title_full Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases
title_fullStr Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases
title_full_unstemmed Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases
title_short Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases
title_sort improving diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopically equivocal pink cutaneous lesions with reflectance confocal microscopy in telemedicine settings: double reader concordance evaluation of 316 cases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27606812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162495
work_keys_str_mv AT łudzikj improvingdiagnosticaccuracyofdermoscopicallyequivocalpinkcutaneouslesionswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyintelemedicinesettingsdoublereaderconcordanceevaluationof316cases
AT witkowskiam improvingdiagnosticaccuracyofdermoscopicallyequivocalpinkcutaneouslesionswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyintelemedicinesettingsdoublereaderconcordanceevaluationof316cases
AT rotermankoniecznai improvingdiagnosticaccuracyofdermoscopicallyequivocalpinkcutaneouslesionswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyintelemedicinesettingsdoublereaderconcordanceevaluationof316cases
AT bassolis improvingdiagnosticaccuracyofdermoscopicallyequivocalpinkcutaneouslesionswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyintelemedicinesettingsdoublereaderconcordanceevaluationof316cases
AT farnetanif improvingdiagnosticaccuracyofdermoscopicallyequivocalpinkcutaneouslesionswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyintelemedicinesettingsdoublereaderconcordanceevaluationof316cases
AT pellacanig improvingdiagnosticaccuracyofdermoscopicallyequivocalpinkcutaneouslesionswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyintelemedicinesettingsdoublereaderconcordanceevaluationof316cases