Cargando…
Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases
BACKGROUND: Solitary pink lesions in differential diagnosis with hypopigmented/amelanotic melanoma present a diagnostic challenge in daily practice and are regularly referred for second expert opinion. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) has been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27606812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162495 |
_version_ | 1782452496889806848 |
---|---|
author | Łudzik, J. Witkowski, A. M. Roterman-Konieczna, I. Bassoli, S. Farnetani, F. Pellacani, G. |
author_facet | Łudzik, J. Witkowski, A. M. Roterman-Konieczna, I. Bassoli, S. Farnetani, F. Pellacani, G. |
author_sort | Łudzik, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Solitary pink lesions in differential diagnosis with hypopigmented/amelanotic melanoma present a diagnostic challenge in daily practice and are regularly referred for second expert opinion. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) has been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopically equivocal pink lesions. No studies have been performed to evaluate the effect of adding a second expert reader and automatic removal of lesions with discordant management recommendations and its potential effect on diagnostic sensitivity and final management of these lesions in retrospective or telemedicine settings. OBJECTIVE: To improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce potential mismanagement of dermoscopically equivocal pink cutaneous lesions by implementing double reader concordance evaluation of RCM images. METHODS: 316 dermoscopically equivocal pink lesions with dermoscopy-RCM image sets were evaluated retrospectively. Accuracy of three readers was evaluated by single reader evaluation of dermoscopy only and dermoscopy-RCM image sets and finally by double reader evaluation of dermoscopy-RCM image sets. Lesions with discordant diagnosis between two readers were automatically recommended for excision. RESULTS: Dermoscopy only evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 95.9% and specificity of 33.6%, with 1 of 12 amelanotic melanomas mismanaged. Dermoscopy-RCM image set single reader evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 93.9% and overall specificity of 54.2%, with 1 of 12 melanomas mismanaged. Dermoscopy-RCM image set double reader concordance evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 98.3% and specificity of 42.7%, with no amelanotic melanoma mismanagement. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of dermoscopy-RCM image sets of equivocal pink lesions by a single reader in telemedicine settings is limited by the potential for misdiagnosis of dangerous malignant lesions. Double reader concordance evaluation with automatic referral of lesions for removal in the case of discordant diagnosis improves the diagnostic sensitivity in this subset of lesions and reduce potential misdiagnosis in settings where a second expert opinion may be employed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5015858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50158582016-09-27 Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases Łudzik, J. Witkowski, A. M. Roterman-Konieczna, I. Bassoli, S. Farnetani, F. Pellacani, G. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Solitary pink lesions in differential diagnosis with hypopigmented/amelanotic melanoma present a diagnostic challenge in daily practice and are regularly referred for second expert opinion. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) has been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopically equivocal pink lesions. No studies have been performed to evaluate the effect of adding a second expert reader and automatic removal of lesions with discordant management recommendations and its potential effect on diagnostic sensitivity and final management of these lesions in retrospective or telemedicine settings. OBJECTIVE: To improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce potential mismanagement of dermoscopically equivocal pink cutaneous lesions by implementing double reader concordance evaluation of RCM images. METHODS: 316 dermoscopically equivocal pink lesions with dermoscopy-RCM image sets were evaluated retrospectively. Accuracy of three readers was evaluated by single reader evaluation of dermoscopy only and dermoscopy-RCM image sets and finally by double reader evaluation of dermoscopy-RCM image sets. Lesions with discordant diagnosis between two readers were automatically recommended for excision. RESULTS: Dermoscopy only evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 95.9% and specificity of 33.6%, with 1 of 12 amelanotic melanomas mismanaged. Dermoscopy-RCM image set single reader evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 93.9% and overall specificity of 54.2%, with 1 of 12 melanomas mismanaged. Dermoscopy-RCM image set double reader concordance evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 98.3% and specificity of 42.7%, with no amelanotic melanoma mismanagement. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of dermoscopy-RCM image sets of equivocal pink lesions by a single reader in telemedicine settings is limited by the potential for misdiagnosis of dangerous malignant lesions. Double reader concordance evaluation with automatic referral of lesions for removal in the case of discordant diagnosis improves the diagnostic sensitivity in this subset of lesions and reduce potential misdiagnosis in settings where a second expert opinion may be employed. Public Library of Science 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5015858/ /pubmed/27606812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162495 Text en © 2016 Łudzik et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Łudzik, J. Witkowski, A. M. Roterman-Konieczna, I. Bassoli, S. Farnetani, F. Pellacani, G. Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases |
title | Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases |
title_full | Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases |
title_fullStr | Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases |
title_short | Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases |
title_sort | improving diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopically equivocal pink cutaneous lesions with reflectance confocal microscopy in telemedicine settings: double reader concordance evaluation of 316 cases |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27606812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162495 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT łudzikj improvingdiagnosticaccuracyofdermoscopicallyequivocalpinkcutaneouslesionswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyintelemedicinesettingsdoublereaderconcordanceevaluationof316cases AT witkowskiam improvingdiagnosticaccuracyofdermoscopicallyequivocalpinkcutaneouslesionswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyintelemedicinesettingsdoublereaderconcordanceevaluationof316cases AT rotermankoniecznai improvingdiagnosticaccuracyofdermoscopicallyequivocalpinkcutaneouslesionswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyintelemedicinesettingsdoublereaderconcordanceevaluationof316cases AT bassolis improvingdiagnosticaccuracyofdermoscopicallyequivocalpinkcutaneouslesionswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyintelemedicinesettingsdoublereaderconcordanceevaluationof316cases AT farnetanif improvingdiagnosticaccuracyofdermoscopicallyequivocalpinkcutaneouslesionswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyintelemedicinesettingsdoublereaderconcordanceevaluationof316cases AT pellacanig improvingdiagnosticaccuracyofdermoscopicallyequivocalpinkcutaneouslesionswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyintelemedicinesettingsdoublereaderconcordanceevaluationof316cases |