Cargando…

Sensitivity of Allelic Divergence to Genomic Position: Lessons from the Drosophila tan Gene

To identify genetic variants underlying changes in phenotypes within and between species, researchers often utilize transgenic animals to compare the function of alleles in different genetic backgrounds. In Drosophila, targeted integration mediated by the ΦC31 integrase allows activity of alternativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: John, Alisha V., Sramkoski, Lisa L., Walker, Elizabeth A., Cooley, Arielle M., Wittkopp, Patricia J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Genetics Society of America 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27449514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.032029
_version_ 1782452516059873280
author John, Alisha V.
Sramkoski, Lisa L.
Walker, Elizabeth A.
Cooley, Arielle M.
Wittkopp, Patricia J.
author_facet John, Alisha V.
Sramkoski, Lisa L.
Walker, Elizabeth A.
Cooley, Arielle M.
Wittkopp, Patricia J.
author_sort John, Alisha V.
collection PubMed
description To identify genetic variants underlying changes in phenotypes within and between species, researchers often utilize transgenic animals to compare the function of alleles in different genetic backgrounds. In Drosophila, targeted integration mediated by the ΦC31 integrase allows activity of alternative alleles to be compared at the same genomic location. By using the same insertion site for each transgene, position effects are generally assumed to be controlled for because both alleles are surrounded by the same genomic context. Here, we test this assumption by comparing the activity of tan alleles from two Drosophila species, D. americana and D. novamexicana, at five different genomic locations in D. melanogaster. We found that the relative effects of these alleles varied among insertion sites, with no difference in activity observed between them at two sites. One of these sites simply silenced both transgenes, but the other allowed expression of both alleles that was sufficient to rescue a mutant phenotype yet failed to reveal the functional differences between the two alleles. These results suggest that more than one insertion site should be used when comparing the activity of transgenes because failing to do so could cause functional differences between alleles to go undetected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5015952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Genetics Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50159522016-09-09 Sensitivity of Allelic Divergence to Genomic Position: Lessons from the Drosophila tan Gene John, Alisha V. Sramkoski, Lisa L. Walker, Elizabeth A. Cooley, Arielle M. Wittkopp, Patricia J. G3 (Bethesda) Investigations To identify genetic variants underlying changes in phenotypes within and between species, researchers often utilize transgenic animals to compare the function of alleles in different genetic backgrounds. In Drosophila, targeted integration mediated by the ΦC31 integrase allows activity of alternative alleles to be compared at the same genomic location. By using the same insertion site for each transgene, position effects are generally assumed to be controlled for because both alleles are surrounded by the same genomic context. Here, we test this assumption by comparing the activity of tan alleles from two Drosophila species, D. americana and D. novamexicana, at five different genomic locations in D. melanogaster. We found that the relative effects of these alleles varied among insertion sites, with no difference in activity observed between them at two sites. One of these sites simply silenced both transgenes, but the other allowed expression of both alleles that was sufficient to rescue a mutant phenotype yet failed to reveal the functional differences between the two alleles. These results suggest that more than one insertion site should be used when comparing the activity of transgenes because failing to do so could cause functional differences between alleles to go undetected. Genetics Society of America 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5015952/ /pubmed/27449514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.032029 Text en Copyright © 2016 John et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Investigations
John, Alisha V.
Sramkoski, Lisa L.
Walker, Elizabeth A.
Cooley, Arielle M.
Wittkopp, Patricia J.
Sensitivity of Allelic Divergence to Genomic Position: Lessons from the Drosophila tan Gene
title Sensitivity of Allelic Divergence to Genomic Position: Lessons from the Drosophila tan Gene
title_full Sensitivity of Allelic Divergence to Genomic Position: Lessons from the Drosophila tan Gene
title_fullStr Sensitivity of Allelic Divergence to Genomic Position: Lessons from the Drosophila tan Gene
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of Allelic Divergence to Genomic Position: Lessons from the Drosophila tan Gene
title_short Sensitivity of Allelic Divergence to Genomic Position: Lessons from the Drosophila tan Gene
title_sort sensitivity of allelic divergence to genomic position: lessons from the drosophila tan gene
topic Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27449514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.032029
work_keys_str_mv AT johnalishav sensitivityofallelicdivergencetogenomicpositionlessonsfromthedrosophilatangene
AT sramkoskilisal sensitivityofallelicdivergencetogenomicpositionlessonsfromthedrosophilatangene
AT walkerelizabetha sensitivityofallelicdivergencetogenomicpositionlessonsfromthedrosophilatangene
AT cooleyariellem sensitivityofallelicdivergencetogenomicpositionlessonsfromthedrosophilatangene
AT wittkopppatriciaj sensitivityofallelicdivergencetogenomicpositionlessonsfromthedrosophilatangene