Cargando…

Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review

We performed a systematic review of several pattern analysis approaches for classifying breast lesions using dynamic, morphological, and textural features in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Several machine learning approaches, namely artificial neural networks (ANN),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fusco, Roberta, Sansone, Mario, Filice, Salvatore, Carone, Guglielmo, Amato, Daniela Maria, Sansone, Carlo, Petrillo, Antonella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27656117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40846-016-0163-7
_version_ 1782452581564416000
author Fusco, Roberta
Sansone, Mario
Filice, Salvatore
Carone, Guglielmo
Amato, Daniela Maria
Sansone, Carlo
Petrillo, Antonella
author_facet Fusco, Roberta
Sansone, Mario
Filice, Salvatore
Carone, Guglielmo
Amato, Daniela Maria
Sansone, Carlo
Petrillo, Antonella
author_sort Fusco, Roberta
collection PubMed
description We performed a systematic review of several pattern analysis approaches for classifying breast lesions using dynamic, morphological, and textural features in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Several machine learning approaches, namely artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), tree-based classifiers (TC), and Bayesian classifiers (BC), and features used for classification are described. The findings of a systematic review of 26 studies are presented. The sensitivity and specificity are respectively 91 and 83 % for ANN, 85 and 82 % for SVM, 96 and 85 % for LDA, 92 and 87 % for TC, and 82 and 85 % for BC. The sensitivity and specificity are respectively 82 and 74 % for dynamic features, 93 and 60 % for morphological features, 88 and 81 % for textural features, 95 and 86 % for a combination of dynamic and morphological features, and 88 and 84 % for a combination of dynamic, morphological, and other features. LDA and TC have the best performance. A combination of dynamic and morphological features gives the best performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5016558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50165582016-09-19 Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review Fusco, Roberta Sansone, Mario Filice, Salvatore Carone, Guglielmo Amato, Daniela Maria Sansone, Carlo Petrillo, Antonella J Med Biol Eng Review Article We performed a systematic review of several pattern analysis approaches for classifying breast lesions using dynamic, morphological, and textural features in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Several machine learning approaches, namely artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), tree-based classifiers (TC), and Bayesian classifiers (BC), and features used for classification are described. The findings of a systematic review of 26 studies are presented. The sensitivity and specificity are respectively 91 and 83 % for ANN, 85 and 82 % for SVM, 96 and 85 % for LDA, 92 and 87 % for TC, and 82 and 85 % for BC. The sensitivity and specificity are respectively 82 and 74 % for dynamic features, 93 and 60 % for morphological features, 88 and 81 % for textural features, 95 and 86 % for a combination of dynamic and morphological features, and 88 and 84 % for a combination of dynamic, morphological, and other features. LDA and TC have the best performance. A combination of dynamic and morphological features gives the best performance. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-08-31 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5016558/ /pubmed/27656117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40846-016-0163-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Fusco, Roberta
Sansone, Mario
Filice, Salvatore
Carone, Guglielmo
Amato, Daniela Maria
Sansone, Carlo
Petrillo, Antonella
Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review
title Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review
title_full Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review
title_short Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review
title_sort pattern recognition approaches for breast cancer dce-mri classification: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27656117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40846-016-0163-7
work_keys_str_mv AT fuscoroberta patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview
AT sansonemario patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview
AT filicesalvatore patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview
AT caroneguglielmo patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview
AT amatodanielamaria patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview
AT sansonecarlo patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview
AT petrilloantonella patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview