Cargando…
Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review
We performed a systematic review of several pattern analysis approaches for classifying breast lesions using dynamic, morphological, and textural features in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Several machine learning approaches, namely artificial neural networks (ANN),...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27656117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40846-016-0163-7 |
_version_ | 1782452581564416000 |
---|---|
author | Fusco, Roberta Sansone, Mario Filice, Salvatore Carone, Guglielmo Amato, Daniela Maria Sansone, Carlo Petrillo, Antonella |
author_facet | Fusco, Roberta Sansone, Mario Filice, Salvatore Carone, Guglielmo Amato, Daniela Maria Sansone, Carlo Petrillo, Antonella |
author_sort | Fusco, Roberta |
collection | PubMed |
description | We performed a systematic review of several pattern analysis approaches for classifying breast lesions using dynamic, morphological, and textural features in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Several machine learning approaches, namely artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), tree-based classifiers (TC), and Bayesian classifiers (BC), and features used for classification are described. The findings of a systematic review of 26 studies are presented. The sensitivity and specificity are respectively 91 and 83 % for ANN, 85 and 82 % for SVM, 96 and 85 % for LDA, 92 and 87 % for TC, and 82 and 85 % for BC. The sensitivity and specificity are respectively 82 and 74 % for dynamic features, 93 and 60 % for morphological features, 88 and 81 % for textural features, 95 and 86 % for a combination of dynamic and morphological features, and 88 and 84 % for a combination of dynamic, morphological, and other features. LDA and TC have the best performance. A combination of dynamic and morphological features gives the best performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5016558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50165582016-09-19 Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review Fusco, Roberta Sansone, Mario Filice, Salvatore Carone, Guglielmo Amato, Daniela Maria Sansone, Carlo Petrillo, Antonella J Med Biol Eng Review Article We performed a systematic review of several pattern analysis approaches for classifying breast lesions using dynamic, morphological, and textural features in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Several machine learning approaches, namely artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), tree-based classifiers (TC), and Bayesian classifiers (BC), and features used for classification are described. The findings of a systematic review of 26 studies are presented. The sensitivity and specificity are respectively 91 and 83 % for ANN, 85 and 82 % for SVM, 96 and 85 % for LDA, 92 and 87 % for TC, and 82 and 85 % for BC. The sensitivity and specificity are respectively 82 and 74 % for dynamic features, 93 and 60 % for morphological features, 88 and 81 % for textural features, 95 and 86 % for a combination of dynamic and morphological features, and 88 and 84 % for a combination of dynamic, morphological, and other features. LDA and TC have the best performance. A combination of dynamic and morphological features gives the best performance. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-08-31 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5016558/ /pubmed/27656117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40846-016-0163-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Fusco, Roberta Sansone, Mario Filice, Salvatore Carone, Guglielmo Amato, Daniela Maria Sansone, Carlo Petrillo, Antonella Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review |
title | Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | pattern recognition approaches for breast cancer dce-mri classification: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27656117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40846-016-0163-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuscoroberta patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview AT sansonemario patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview AT filicesalvatore patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview AT caroneguglielmo patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview AT amatodanielamaria patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview AT sansonecarlo patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview AT petrilloantonella patternrecognitionapproachesforbreastcancerdcemriclassificationasystematicreview |