Cargando…

A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a paediatric medical imaging department

INTRODUCTION: The gold standard in general radiography is to place a radiopaque anatomical side marker in the field of view for each radiographic image prior to exposure. The advent of digital radiography has allowed for anatomical side markers to be digitally added to films as part of post‐processi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barry, Kate, Kumar, Saravana, Linke, Rebecca, Dawes, Emma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.176
_version_ 1782452593097703424
author Barry, Kate
Kumar, Saravana
Linke, Rebecca
Dawes, Emma
author_facet Barry, Kate
Kumar, Saravana
Linke, Rebecca
Dawes, Emma
author_sort Barry, Kate
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The gold standard in general radiography is to place a radiopaque anatomical side marker in the field of view for each radiographic image prior to exposure. The advent of digital radiography has allowed for anatomical side markers to be digitally added to films as part of post‐processing. The aim of this audit was to identify whether general X‐ray images performed in a tertiary Women's and Children's Hospital were being appropriately annotated with a definitive side marker, and to identify factors that may contribute to inappropriately labelled images. METHODS: Four hundred images from 201 patients’ examinations occurring within a randomly selected time period were assessed to ascertain whether radiographic anatomical side markers were visible when images were viewed via the hospitals main viewing platform. The audit occurred in January 2014. The scope included both mobile and in‐department general X‐ray examinations, with the patient age range extending from 1 day to 18 years. RESULTS: Of the 400 images evaluated, 88 (22%) were found to have a lead marker that matched the anatomy being imaged within the primary beam; 289 (72.3%) images contained a correct digital marker inserted as part of the post‐processing of the image. In total, 377 (94.2%) images were appropriately marked. Of the 23 (5.8%) images not marked correctly, 22 images had no marker and 1 was incorrectly marked with a digital marker. There was a noticeable relationship between absent anatomical markers and chest X‐rays performed outside of the medical imaging department. CONCLUSIONS: While it is encouraging that the majority of the images assessed were correctly annotated, with only a small number of missing markers, there are opportunities for further improvement. The audit findings suggest that reduced access to lead markers influences marker use. Strategies that may improve compliance at an individual level include distribution of personalised anatomical side markers, and targeted staff education sessions. At a department level, regular audits and monitoring should be encouraged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5016612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50166122016-09-19 A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a paediatric medical imaging department Barry, Kate Kumar, Saravana Linke, Rebecca Dawes, Emma J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: The gold standard in general radiography is to place a radiopaque anatomical side marker in the field of view for each radiographic image prior to exposure. The advent of digital radiography has allowed for anatomical side markers to be digitally added to films as part of post‐processing. The aim of this audit was to identify whether general X‐ray images performed in a tertiary Women's and Children's Hospital were being appropriately annotated with a definitive side marker, and to identify factors that may contribute to inappropriately labelled images. METHODS: Four hundred images from 201 patients’ examinations occurring within a randomly selected time period were assessed to ascertain whether radiographic anatomical side markers were visible when images were viewed via the hospitals main viewing platform. The audit occurred in January 2014. The scope included both mobile and in‐department general X‐ray examinations, with the patient age range extending from 1 day to 18 years. RESULTS: Of the 400 images evaluated, 88 (22%) were found to have a lead marker that matched the anatomy being imaged within the primary beam; 289 (72.3%) images contained a correct digital marker inserted as part of the post‐processing of the image. In total, 377 (94.2%) images were appropriately marked. Of the 23 (5.8%) images not marked correctly, 22 images had no marker and 1 was incorrectly marked with a digital marker. There was a noticeable relationship between absent anatomical markers and chest X‐rays performed outside of the medical imaging department. CONCLUSIONS: While it is encouraging that the majority of the images assessed were correctly annotated, with only a small number of missing markers, there are opportunities for further improvement. The audit findings suggest that reduced access to lead markers influences marker use. Strategies that may improve compliance at an individual level include distribution of personalised anatomical side markers, and targeted staff education sessions. At a department level, regular audits and monitoring should be encouraged. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-25 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5016612/ /pubmed/27648278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.176 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Institute of Radiography and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Barry, Kate
Kumar, Saravana
Linke, Rebecca
Dawes, Emma
A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a paediatric medical imaging department
title A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a paediatric medical imaging department
title_full A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a paediatric medical imaging department
title_fullStr A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a paediatric medical imaging department
title_full_unstemmed A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a paediatric medical imaging department
title_short A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a paediatric medical imaging department
title_sort clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a paediatric medical imaging department
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.176
work_keys_str_mv AT barrykate aclinicalauditofanatomicalsidemarkeruseinapaediatricmedicalimagingdepartment
AT kumarsaravana aclinicalauditofanatomicalsidemarkeruseinapaediatricmedicalimagingdepartment
AT linkerebecca aclinicalauditofanatomicalsidemarkeruseinapaediatricmedicalimagingdepartment
AT dawesemma aclinicalauditofanatomicalsidemarkeruseinapaediatricmedicalimagingdepartment
AT barrykate clinicalauditofanatomicalsidemarkeruseinapaediatricmedicalimagingdepartment
AT kumarsaravana clinicalauditofanatomicalsidemarkeruseinapaediatricmedicalimagingdepartment
AT linkerebecca clinicalauditofanatomicalsidemarkeruseinapaediatricmedicalimagingdepartment
AT dawesemma clinicalauditofanatomicalsidemarkeruseinapaediatricmedicalimagingdepartment