Cargando…

Strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data

Knowledge of kin relationships between members of wild animal populations has broad application in ecology and evolution research by allowing the investigation of dispersal dynamics, mating systems, inbreeding avoidance, kin recognition, and kin selection as well as aiding the management of endanger...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Städele, Veronika, Vigilant, Linda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2346
_version_ 1782452598432858112
author Städele, Veronika
Vigilant, Linda
author_facet Städele, Veronika
Vigilant, Linda
author_sort Städele, Veronika
collection PubMed
description Knowledge of kin relationships between members of wild animal populations has broad application in ecology and evolution research by allowing the investigation of dispersal dynamics, mating systems, inbreeding avoidance, kin recognition, and kin selection as well as aiding the management of endangered populations. However, the assessment of kinship among members of wild animal populations is difficult in the absence of detailed multigenerational pedigrees. Here, we first review the distinction between genetic relatedness and kinship derived from pedigrees and how this makes the identification of kin using genetic data inherently challenging. We then describe useful approaches to kinship classification, such as parentage analysis and sibship reconstruction, and explain how the combined use of marker systems with biparental and uniparental inheritance, demographic information, likelihood analyses, relatedness coefficients, and estimation of misclassification rates can yield reliable classifications of kinship in groups with complex kin structures. We outline alternative approaches for cases in which explicit knowledge of dyadic kinship is not necessary, but indirect inferences about kinship on a group‐ or population‐wide scale suffice, such as whether more highly related dyads are in closer spatial proximity. Although analysis of highly variable microsatellite loci is still the dominant approach for studies on wild populations, we describe how the long‐awaited use of large‐scale single‐nucleotide polymorphism and sequencing data derived from noninvasive low‐quality samples may eventually lead to highly accurate assessments of varying degrees of kinship in wild populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5016635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50166352016-09-19 Strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data Städele, Veronika Vigilant, Linda Ecol Evol Review Knowledge of kin relationships between members of wild animal populations has broad application in ecology and evolution research by allowing the investigation of dispersal dynamics, mating systems, inbreeding avoidance, kin recognition, and kin selection as well as aiding the management of endangered populations. However, the assessment of kinship among members of wild animal populations is difficult in the absence of detailed multigenerational pedigrees. Here, we first review the distinction between genetic relatedness and kinship derived from pedigrees and how this makes the identification of kin using genetic data inherently challenging. We then describe useful approaches to kinship classification, such as parentage analysis and sibship reconstruction, and explain how the combined use of marker systems with biparental and uniparental inheritance, demographic information, likelihood analyses, relatedness coefficients, and estimation of misclassification rates can yield reliable classifications of kinship in groups with complex kin structures. We outline alternative approaches for cases in which explicit knowledge of dyadic kinship is not necessary, but indirect inferences about kinship on a group‐ or population‐wide scale suffice, such as whether more highly related dyads are in closer spatial proximity. Although analysis of highly variable microsatellite loci is still the dominant approach for studies on wild populations, we describe how the long‐awaited use of large‐scale single‐nucleotide polymorphism and sequencing data derived from noninvasive low‐quality samples may eventually lead to highly accurate assessments of varying degrees of kinship in wild populations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5016635/ /pubmed/27648229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2346 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Städele, Veronika
Vigilant, Linda
Strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data
title Strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data
title_full Strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data
title_fullStr Strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data
title_short Strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data
title_sort strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2346
work_keys_str_mv AT stadeleveronika strategiesfordeterminingkinshipinwildpopulationsusinggeneticdata
AT vigilantlinda strategiesfordeterminingkinshipinwildpopulationsusinggeneticdata