Cargando…

Both morph‐ and species‐dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species

The interaction between floral traits and reproductive isolation is crucial to explaining the extraordinary diversity of angiosperms. Heterostyly, a complex floral polymorphism that optimizes outcrossing, evolved repeatedly and has been shown to accelerate diversification in primroses, yet its poten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keller, Barbara, de Vos, Jurriaan M., Schmidt‐Lebuhn, Alexander N., Thomson, James D., Conti, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2293
_version_ 1782452600751259648
author Keller, Barbara
de Vos, Jurriaan M.
Schmidt‐Lebuhn, Alexander N.
Thomson, James D.
Conti, Elena
author_facet Keller, Barbara
de Vos, Jurriaan M.
Schmidt‐Lebuhn, Alexander N.
Thomson, James D.
Conti, Elena
author_sort Keller, Barbara
collection PubMed
description The interaction between floral traits and reproductive isolation is crucial to explaining the extraordinary diversity of angiosperms. Heterostyly, a complex floral polymorphism that optimizes outcrossing, evolved repeatedly and has been shown to accelerate diversification in primroses, yet its potential influence on isolating mechanisms remains unexplored. Furthermore, the relative contribution of pre‐ versus postmating barriers to reproductive isolation is still debated. No experimental study has yet evaluated the possible effects of heterostyly on pre‐ and postmating reproductive mechanisms. We quantify multiple reproductive barriers between the heterostylous Primula elatior (oxlip) and P. vulgaris (primrose), which readily hybridize when co‐occurring, and test whether traits of heterostyly contribute to reproductive barriers in unique ways. We find that premating isolation is key for both species, while postmating isolation is considerable only for P. vulgaris; ecogeographic isolation is crucial for both species, while phenological, seed developmental, and hybrid sterility barriers are also important in P. vulgaris, implicating sympatrically higher gene flow into P. elatior. We document for the first time that, in addition to the aforementioned species‐dependent asymmetries, morph‐dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species. Indeed, the interspecific decrease of reciprocity between high sexual organs of complementary floral morphs limits interspecific pollen transfer from anthers of short‐styled flowers to stigmas of long‐styled flowers, while higher reciprocity between low sexual organs favors introgression over isolation from anthers of long‐styled flowers to stigmas of short‐styled flowers. Finally, intramorph incompatibility persists across species boundaries, but is weakened in long‐styled flowers of P. elatior, opening a possible backdoor to gene flow through intramorph pollen transfer between species. Therefore, patterns of gene flow across species boundaries are likely affected by floral morph composition of adjacent populations. To summarize, our study highlights the general importance of premating isolation and newly illustrates that both morph‐ and species‐dependent asymmetries shape boundaries between heterostylous species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5016645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50166452016-09-19 Both morph‐ and species‐dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species Keller, Barbara de Vos, Jurriaan M. Schmidt‐Lebuhn, Alexander N. Thomson, James D. Conti, Elena Ecol Evol Original Research The interaction between floral traits and reproductive isolation is crucial to explaining the extraordinary diversity of angiosperms. Heterostyly, a complex floral polymorphism that optimizes outcrossing, evolved repeatedly and has been shown to accelerate diversification in primroses, yet its potential influence on isolating mechanisms remains unexplored. Furthermore, the relative contribution of pre‐ versus postmating barriers to reproductive isolation is still debated. No experimental study has yet evaluated the possible effects of heterostyly on pre‐ and postmating reproductive mechanisms. We quantify multiple reproductive barriers between the heterostylous Primula elatior (oxlip) and P. vulgaris (primrose), which readily hybridize when co‐occurring, and test whether traits of heterostyly contribute to reproductive barriers in unique ways. We find that premating isolation is key for both species, while postmating isolation is considerable only for P. vulgaris; ecogeographic isolation is crucial for both species, while phenological, seed developmental, and hybrid sterility barriers are also important in P. vulgaris, implicating sympatrically higher gene flow into P. elatior. We document for the first time that, in addition to the aforementioned species‐dependent asymmetries, morph‐dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species. Indeed, the interspecific decrease of reciprocity between high sexual organs of complementary floral morphs limits interspecific pollen transfer from anthers of short‐styled flowers to stigmas of long‐styled flowers, while higher reciprocity between low sexual organs favors introgression over isolation from anthers of long‐styled flowers to stigmas of short‐styled flowers. Finally, intramorph incompatibility persists across species boundaries, but is weakened in long‐styled flowers of P. elatior, opening a possible backdoor to gene flow through intramorph pollen transfer between species. Therefore, patterns of gene flow across species boundaries are likely affected by floral morph composition of adjacent populations. To summarize, our study highlights the general importance of premating isolation and newly illustrates that both morph‐ and species‐dependent asymmetries shape boundaries between heterostylous species. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5016645/ /pubmed/27648239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2293 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Keller, Barbara
de Vos, Jurriaan M.
Schmidt‐Lebuhn, Alexander N.
Thomson, James D.
Conti, Elena
Both morph‐ and species‐dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species
title Both morph‐ and species‐dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species
title_full Both morph‐ and species‐dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species
title_fullStr Both morph‐ and species‐dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species
title_full_unstemmed Both morph‐ and species‐dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species
title_short Both morph‐ and species‐dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species
title_sort both morph‐ and species‐dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2293
work_keys_str_mv AT kellerbarbara bothmorphandspeciesdependentasymmetriesaffectreproductivebarriersbetweenheterostylousspecies
AT devosjurriaanm bothmorphandspeciesdependentasymmetriesaffectreproductivebarriersbetweenheterostylousspecies
AT schmidtlebuhnalexandern bothmorphandspeciesdependentasymmetriesaffectreproductivebarriersbetweenheterostylousspecies
AT thomsonjamesd bothmorphandspeciesdependentasymmetriesaffectreproductivebarriersbetweenheterostylousspecies
AT contielena bothmorphandspeciesdependentasymmetriesaffectreproductivebarriersbetweenheterostylousspecies