Cargando…

Large‐scale dark diversity estimates: new perspectives with combined methods

Large‐scale biodiversity studies can be more informative if observed diversity in a study site is accompanied by dark diversity, the set of absent although ecologically suitable species. Dark diversity methodology is still being developed and a comparison of different approaches is needed. We used p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ronk, Argo, de Bello, Francesco, Fibich, Pavel, Pärtel, Meelis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2371
_version_ 1782452601196904448
author Ronk, Argo
de Bello, Francesco
Fibich, Pavel
Pärtel, Meelis
author_facet Ronk, Argo
de Bello, Francesco
Fibich, Pavel
Pärtel, Meelis
author_sort Ronk, Argo
collection PubMed
description Large‐scale biodiversity studies can be more informative if observed diversity in a study site is accompanied by dark diversity, the set of absent although ecologically suitable species. Dark diversity methodology is still being developed and a comparison of different approaches is needed. We used plant data at two different scales (European and seven large regions) and compared dark diversity estimates from two mathematical methods: species co‐occurrence (SCO) and species distribution modeling (SDM). We used plant distribution data from the Atlas Florae Europaeae (50 × 50 km grid cells) and seven different European regions (10 × 10 km grid cells). Dark diversity was estimated by SCO and SDM for both datasets. We examined the relationship between the dark diversity sizes (type II regression) and the overlap in species composition (overlap coefficient). We tested the overlap probability according to the hypergeometric distribution. We combined the estimates of the two methods to determine consensus dark diversity and composite dark diversity. We tested whether dark diversity and completeness of site diversity (log ratio of observed and dark diversity) are related to various natural and anthropogenic factors differently than simple observed diversity. Both methods provided similar dark diversity sizes and distribution patterns; dark diversity is greater in southern Europe. The regression line, however, deviated from a 1:1 relationship. The species composition overlap of two methods was about 75%, which is much greater than expected by chance. Both consensus and composite dark diversity estimates showed similar distribution patterns. Both dark diversity and completeness measures exhibit relationships to natural and anthropogenic factors different than those exhibited by observed richness. In summary, dark diversity revealed new biodiversity patterns which were not evident when only observed diversity was examined. A new perspective in dark diversity studies can incorporate a combination of methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5016647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50166472016-09-19 Large‐scale dark diversity estimates: new perspectives with combined methods Ronk, Argo de Bello, Francesco Fibich, Pavel Pärtel, Meelis Ecol Evol Original Research Large‐scale biodiversity studies can be more informative if observed diversity in a study site is accompanied by dark diversity, the set of absent although ecologically suitable species. Dark diversity methodology is still being developed and a comparison of different approaches is needed. We used plant data at two different scales (European and seven large regions) and compared dark diversity estimates from two mathematical methods: species co‐occurrence (SCO) and species distribution modeling (SDM). We used plant distribution data from the Atlas Florae Europaeae (50 × 50 km grid cells) and seven different European regions (10 × 10 km grid cells). Dark diversity was estimated by SCO and SDM for both datasets. We examined the relationship between the dark diversity sizes (type II regression) and the overlap in species composition (overlap coefficient). We tested the overlap probability according to the hypergeometric distribution. We combined the estimates of the two methods to determine consensus dark diversity and composite dark diversity. We tested whether dark diversity and completeness of site diversity (log ratio of observed and dark diversity) are related to various natural and anthropogenic factors differently than simple observed diversity. Both methods provided similar dark diversity sizes and distribution patterns; dark diversity is greater in southern Europe. The regression line, however, deviated from a 1:1 relationship. The species composition overlap of two methods was about 75%, which is much greater than expected by chance. Both consensus and composite dark diversity estimates showed similar distribution patterns. Both dark diversity and completeness measures exhibit relationships to natural and anthropogenic factors different than those exhibited by observed richness. In summary, dark diversity revealed new biodiversity patterns which were not evident when only observed diversity was examined. A new perspective in dark diversity studies can incorporate a combination of methods. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5016647/ /pubmed/27648241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2371 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ronk, Argo
de Bello, Francesco
Fibich, Pavel
Pärtel, Meelis
Large‐scale dark diversity estimates: new perspectives with combined methods
title Large‐scale dark diversity estimates: new perspectives with combined methods
title_full Large‐scale dark diversity estimates: new perspectives with combined methods
title_fullStr Large‐scale dark diversity estimates: new perspectives with combined methods
title_full_unstemmed Large‐scale dark diversity estimates: new perspectives with combined methods
title_short Large‐scale dark diversity estimates: new perspectives with combined methods
title_sort large‐scale dark diversity estimates: new perspectives with combined methods
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2371
work_keys_str_mv AT ronkargo largescaledarkdiversityestimatesnewperspectiveswithcombinedmethods
AT debellofrancesco largescaledarkdiversityestimatesnewperspectiveswithcombinedmethods
AT fibichpavel largescaledarkdiversityestimatesnewperspectiveswithcombinedmethods
AT partelmeelis largescaledarkdiversityestimatesnewperspectiveswithcombinedmethods