Cargando…
A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison
BACKGROUND: Health promotion interventions for older adults are important as they can decrease the onset and evolution of diseases and thus can reduce the medical costs related to those diseases. However, there is no comparative evidence on how those interventions are funded in European countries. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27608766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1515-2 |
_version_ | 1782452608608239616 |
---|---|
author | Arsenijevic, Jelena Groot, Wim Tambor, Marzena Golinowska, Stanislawa Sowada, Christoph Pavlova, Milena |
author_facet | Arsenijevic, Jelena Groot, Wim Tambor, Marzena Golinowska, Stanislawa Sowada, Christoph Pavlova, Milena |
author_sort | Arsenijevic, Jelena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health promotion interventions for older adults are important as they can decrease the onset and evolution of diseases and thus can reduce the medical costs related to those diseases. However, there is no comparative evidence on how those interventions are funded in European countries. The aim of this study is to explore the funding of health promotion interventions in general and health promotion interventions for older adults in particular in European countries. METHOD: We use desk research to identify relevant sources of information such as official national documents, international databases and scientific articles. Fora descriptive overview on how health promotion is funded, we focus on three dimensions: who is funding health promotion, what are the contribution mechanisms and who are the collecting agents. In addition to general information on funding of health promotion, we explore how programs on health promotion for older population groups are funded. RESULTS: There is a great diversity in funding of health promotion in European countries. Although public sources (tax and social health insurance revenues) are still most often used, other mechanisms of funding such as private donations or European funds are also common. Furthermore, there is no clear pattern in the funding of health promotion for different population groups. This is of particular importance for health promotion for older adults where information is limited across European countries. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of funding of health promotion interventions in European countries. The main obstacles for funding health promotion interventions are lack of information and the fragmentation in the funding of health promotion interventions for older adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5016727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50167272016-09-19 A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison Arsenijevic, Jelena Groot, Wim Tambor, Marzena Golinowska, Stanislawa Sowada, Christoph Pavlova, Milena BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Health promotion interventions for older adults are important as they can decrease the onset and evolution of diseases and thus can reduce the medical costs related to those diseases. However, there is no comparative evidence on how those interventions are funded in European countries. The aim of this study is to explore the funding of health promotion interventions in general and health promotion interventions for older adults in particular in European countries. METHOD: We use desk research to identify relevant sources of information such as official national documents, international databases and scientific articles. Fora descriptive overview on how health promotion is funded, we focus on three dimensions: who is funding health promotion, what are the contribution mechanisms and who are the collecting agents. In addition to general information on funding of health promotion, we explore how programs on health promotion for older population groups are funded. RESULTS: There is a great diversity in funding of health promotion in European countries. Although public sources (tax and social health insurance revenues) are still most often used, other mechanisms of funding such as private donations or European funds are also common. Furthermore, there is no clear pattern in the funding of health promotion for different population groups. This is of particular importance for health promotion for older adults where information is limited across European countries. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of funding of health promotion interventions in European countries. The main obstacles for funding health promotion interventions are lack of information and the fragmentation in the funding of health promotion interventions for older adults. BioMed Central 2016-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5016727/ /pubmed/27608766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1515-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Arsenijevic, Jelena Groot, Wim Tambor, Marzena Golinowska, Stanislawa Sowada, Christoph Pavlova, Milena A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison |
title | A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison |
title_full | A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison |
title_fullStr | A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison |
title_short | A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison |
title_sort | review of health promotion funding for older adults in europe: a cross-country comparison |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27608766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1515-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arsenijevicjelena areviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison AT grootwim areviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison AT tambormarzena areviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison AT golinowskastanislawa areviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison AT sowadachristoph areviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison AT pavlovamilena areviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison AT arsenijevicjelena reviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison AT grootwim reviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison AT tambormarzena reviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison AT golinowskastanislawa reviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison AT sowadachristoph reviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison AT pavlovamilena reviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison |