Cargando…

A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison

BACKGROUND: Health promotion interventions for older adults are important as they can decrease the onset and evolution of diseases and thus can reduce the medical costs related to those diseases. However, there is no comparative evidence on how those interventions are funded in European countries. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arsenijevic, Jelena, Groot, Wim, Tambor, Marzena, Golinowska, Stanislawa, Sowada, Christoph, Pavlova, Milena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27608766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1515-2
_version_ 1782452608608239616
author Arsenijevic, Jelena
Groot, Wim
Tambor, Marzena
Golinowska, Stanislawa
Sowada, Christoph
Pavlova, Milena
author_facet Arsenijevic, Jelena
Groot, Wim
Tambor, Marzena
Golinowska, Stanislawa
Sowada, Christoph
Pavlova, Milena
author_sort Arsenijevic, Jelena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health promotion interventions for older adults are important as they can decrease the onset and evolution of diseases and thus can reduce the medical costs related to those diseases. However, there is no comparative evidence on how those interventions are funded in European countries. The aim of this study is to explore the funding of health promotion interventions in general and health promotion interventions for older adults in particular in European countries. METHOD: We use desk research to identify relevant sources of information such as official national documents, international databases and scientific articles. Fora descriptive overview on how health promotion is funded, we focus on three dimensions: who is funding health promotion, what are the contribution mechanisms and who are the collecting agents. In addition to general information on funding of health promotion, we explore how programs on health promotion for older population groups are funded. RESULTS: There is a great diversity in funding of health promotion in European countries. Although public sources (tax and social health insurance revenues) are still most often used, other mechanisms of funding such as private donations or European funds are also common. Furthermore, there is no clear pattern in the funding of health promotion for different population groups. This is of particular importance for health promotion for older adults where information is limited across European countries. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of funding of health promotion interventions in European countries. The main obstacles for funding health promotion interventions are lack of information and the fragmentation in the funding of health promotion interventions for older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5016727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50167272016-09-19 A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison Arsenijevic, Jelena Groot, Wim Tambor, Marzena Golinowska, Stanislawa Sowada, Christoph Pavlova, Milena BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Health promotion interventions for older adults are important as they can decrease the onset and evolution of diseases and thus can reduce the medical costs related to those diseases. However, there is no comparative evidence on how those interventions are funded in European countries. The aim of this study is to explore the funding of health promotion interventions in general and health promotion interventions for older adults in particular in European countries. METHOD: We use desk research to identify relevant sources of information such as official national documents, international databases and scientific articles. Fora descriptive overview on how health promotion is funded, we focus on three dimensions: who is funding health promotion, what are the contribution mechanisms and who are the collecting agents. In addition to general information on funding of health promotion, we explore how programs on health promotion for older population groups are funded. RESULTS: There is a great diversity in funding of health promotion in European countries. Although public sources (tax and social health insurance revenues) are still most often used, other mechanisms of funding such as private donations or European funds are also common. Furthermore, there is no clear pattern in the funding of health promotion for different population groups. This is of particular importance for health promotion for older adults where information is limited across European countries. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of funding of health promotion interventions in European countries. The main obstacles for funding health promotion interventions are lack of information and the fragmentation in the funding of health promotion interventions for older adults. BioMed Central 2016-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5016727/ /pubmed/27608766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1515-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Arsenijevic, Jelena
Groot, Wim
Tambor, Marzena
Golinowska, Stanislawa
Sowada, Christoph
Pavlova, Milena
A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison
title A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison
title_full A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison
title_fullStr A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison
title_full_unstemmed A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison
title_short A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison
title_sort review of health promotion funding for older adults in europe: a cross-country comparison
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27608766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1515-2
work_keys_str_mv AT arsenijevicjelena areviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison
AT grootwim areviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison
AT tambormarzena areviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison
AT golinowskastanislawa areviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison
AT sowadachristoph areviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison
AT pavlovamilena areviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison
AT arsenijevicjelena reviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison
AT grootwim reviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison
AT tambormarzena reviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison
AT golinowskastanislawa reviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison
AT sowadachristoph reviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison
AT pavlovamilena reviewofhealthpromotionfundingforolderadultsineuropeacrosscountrycomparison