Cargando…

The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: The use of e-health and m-health technologies in health promotion and primary prevention among older people is largely unexplored. This study provides a systematic review of the evidence on the scope of the use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention amo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kampmeijer, Ramon, Pavlova, Milena, Tambor, Marzena, Golinowska, Stanisława, Groot, Wim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27608677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1522-3
_version_ 1782452610004942848
author Kampmeijer, Ramon
Pavlova, Milena
Tambor, Marzena
Golinowska, Stanisława
Groot, Wim
author_facet Kampmeijer, Ramon
Pavlova, Milena
Tambor, Marzena
Golinowska, Stanisława
Groot, Wim
author_sort Kampmeijer, Ramon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of e-health and m-health technologies in health promotion and primary prevention among older people is largely unexplored. This study provides a systematic review of the evidence on the scope of the use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults (age 50+). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted in October 2015. The search for relevant publications was done in the search engine PubMed. The key inclusion criteria were: e-health and m-health tools used, participants’ age 50+ years, focus on health promotion and primary prevention, published in the past 10 years, in English, and full-paper can be obtained. The text of the publications was analyzed based on two themes: the characteristics of e-health and m-health tools and the determinants of the use of these tools by older adults. The quality of the studies reviewed was also assessed. RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 656 publications. After we applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 45 publications were selected for the review. In the publications reviewed, various types of e-health/m-health tools were described, namely apps, websites, devices, video consults and webinars. Most of the publications (60 %) reported studies in the US. In 37 % of the publications, the study population was older adults in general, while the rest of the publications studied a specific group of older adults (e.g. women or those with overweight). The publications indicated various facilitators and barriers. The most commonly mentioned facilitator was the support for the use of the e-health/m-health tools that the older adults received. CONCLUSIONS: E-health and m-health tools are used by older adults in diverse health promotion programs, but also outside formal programs to monitor and improve their health. The latter is hardly studied. The successful use of e-health/m-health tools in health promotion programs for older adults greatly depends on the older adults’ motivation and support that older adults receive when using e-health and m-health tools. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1522-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5016733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50167332016-09-19 The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review Kampmeijer, Ramon Pavlova, Milena Tambor, Marzena Golinowska, Stanisława Groot, Wim BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The use of e-health and m-health technologies in health promotion and primary prevention among older people is largely unexplored. This study provides a systematic review of the evidence on the scope of the use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults (age 50+). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted in October 2015. The search for relevant publications was done in the search engine PubMed. The key inclusion criteria were: e-health and m-health tools used, participants’ age 50+ years, focus on health promotion and primary prevention, published in the past 10 years, in English, and full-paper can be obtained. The text of the publications was analyzed based on two themes: the characteristics of e-health and m-health tools and the determinants of the use of these tools by older adults. The quality of the studies reviewed was also assessed. RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 656 publications. After we applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 45 publications were selected for the review. In the publications reviewed, various types of e-health/m-health tools were described, namely apps, websites, devices, video consults and webinars. Most of the publications (60 %) reported studies in the US. In 37 % of the publications, the study population was older adults in general, while the rest of the publications studied a specific group of older adults (e.g. women or those with overweight). The publications indicated various facilitators and barriers. The most commonly mentioned facilitator was the support for the use of the e-health/m-health tools that the older adults received. CONCLUSIONS: E-health and m-health tools are used by older adults in diverse health promotion programs, but also outside formal programs to monitor and improve their health. The latter is hardly studied. The successful use of e-health/m-health tools in health promotion programs for older adults greatly depends on the older adults’ motivation and support that older adults receive when using e-health and m-health tools. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1522-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5016733/ /pubmed/27608677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1522-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kampmeijer, Ramon
Pavlova, Milena
Tambor, Marzena
Golinowska, Stanisława
Groot, Wim
The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review
title The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review
title_full The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review
title_short The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review
title_sort use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27608677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1522-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kampmeijerramon theuseofehealthandmhealthtoolsinhealthpromotionandprimarypreventionamongolderadultsasystematicliteraturereview
AT pavlovamilena theuseofehealthandmhealthtoolsinhealthpromotionandprimarypreventionamongolderadultsasystematicliteraturereview
AT tambormarzena theuseofehealthandmhealthtoolsinhealthpromotionandprimarypreventionamongolderadultsasystematicliteraturereview
AT golinowskastanisława theuseofehealthandmhealthtoolsinhealthpromotionandprimarypreventionamongolderadultsasystematicliteraturereview
AT grootwim theuseofehealthandmhealthtoolsinhealthpromotionandprimarypreventionamongolderadultsasystematicliteraturereview
AT kampmeijerramon useofehealthandmhealthtoolsinhealthpromotionandprimarypreventionamongolderadultsasystematicliteraturereview
AT pavlovamilena useofehealthandmhealthtoolsinhealthpromotionandprimarypreventionamongolderadultsasystematicliteraturereview
AT tambormarzena useofehealthandmhealthtoolsinhealthpromotionandprimarypreventionamongolderadultsasystematicliteraturereview
AT golinowskastanisława useofehealthandmhealthtoolsinhealthpromotionandprimarypreventionamongolderadultsasystematicliteraturereview
AT grootwim useofehealthandmhealthtoolsinhealthpromotionandprimarypreventionamongolderadultsasystematicliteraturereview