Cargando…

Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO (2) under a Free‐Air CO (2) Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi‐arid environment

The response of wheat crops to elevated CO (2) (eCO (2)) was measured and modelled with the Australian Grains Free‐Air CO (2) Enrichment experiment, located at Horsham, Australia. Treatments included CO (2) by water, N and temperature. The location represents a semi‐arid environment with a seasonal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Leary, Garry J., Christy, Brendan, Nuttall, James, Huth, Neil, Cammarano, Davide, Stöckle, Claudio, Basso, Bruno, Shcherbak, Iurii, Fitzgerald, Glenn, Luo, Qunying, Farre‐Codina, Immaculada, Palta, Jairo, Asseng, Senthold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25482824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12830
_version_ 1782452619116019712
author O'Leary, Garry J.
Christy, Brendan
Nuttall, James
Huth, Neil
Cammarano, Davide
Stöckle, Claudio
Basso, Bruno
Shcherbak, Iurii
Fitzgerald, Glenn
Luo, Qunying
Farre‐Codina, Immaculada
Palta, Jairo
Asseng, Senthold
author_facet O'Leary, Garry J.
Christy, Brendan
Nuttall, James
Huth, Neil
Cammarano, Davide
Stöckle, Claudio
Basso, Bruno
Shcherbak, Iurii
Fitzgerald, Glenn
Luo, Qunying
Farre‐Codina, Immaculada
Palta, Jairo
Asseng, Senthold
author_sort O'Leary, Garry J.
collection PubMed
description The response of wheat crops to elevated CO (2) (eCO (2)) was measured and modelled with the Australian Grains Free‐Air CO (2) Enrichment experiment, located at Horsham, Australia. Treatments included CO (2) by water, N and temperature. The location represents a semi‐arid environment with a seasonal VPD of around 0.5 kPa. Over 3 years, the observed mean biomass at anthesis and grain yield ranged from 4200 to 10 200 kg ha(−1) and 1600 to 3900 kg ha(−1), respectively, over various sowing times and irrigation regimes. The mean observed response to daytime eCO (2) (from 365 to 550 μmol mol(−1) CO (2)) was relatively consistent for biomass at stem elongation and at anthesis and LAI at anthesis and grain yield with 21%, 23%, 21% and 26%, respectively. Seasonal water use was decreased from 320 to 301 mm (P = 0.10) by eCO (2), increasing water use efficiency for biomass and yield, 36% and 31%, respectively. The performance of six models (APSIM‐Wheat, APSIM‐Nwheat, CAT‐Wheat, CROPSYST, OLEARY‐CONNOR and SALUS) in simulating crop responses to eCO (2) was similar and within or close to the experimental error for accumulated biomass, yield and water use response, despite some variations in early growth and LAI. The primary mechanism of biomass accumulation via radiation use efficiency (RUE) or transpiration efficiency (TE) was not critical to define the overall response to eCO (2). However, under irrigation, the effect of late sowing on response to eCO (2) to biomass accumulation at DC65 was substantial in the observed data (~40%), but the simulated response was smaller, ranging from 17% to 28%. Simulated response from all six models under no water or nitrogen stress showed similar response to eCO (2) under irrigation, but the differences compared to the dryland treatment were small. Further experimental work on the interactive effects of eCO (2), water and temperature is required to resolve these model discrepancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5016785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50167852016-09-20 Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO (2) under a Free‐Air CO (2) Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi‐arid environment O'Leary, Garry J. Christy, Brendan Nuttall, James Huth, Neil Cammarano, Davide Stöckle, Claudio Basso, Bruno Shcherbak, Iurii Fitzgerald, Glenn Luo, Qunying Farre‐Codina, Immaculada Palta, Jairo Asseng, Senthold Glob Chang Biol Primary Research Articles The response of wheat crops to elevated CO (2) (eCO (2)) was measured and modelled with the Australian Grains Free‐Air CO (2) Enrichment experiment, located at Horsham, Australia. Treatments included CO (2) by water, N and temperature. The location represents a semi‐arid environment with a seasonal VPD of around 0.5 kPa. Over 3 years, the observed mean biomass at anthesis and grain yield ranged from 4200 to 10 200 kg ha(−1) and 1600 to 3900 kg ha(−1), respectively, over various sowing times and irrigation regimes. The mean observed response to daytime eCO (2) (from 365 to 550 μmol mol(−1) CO (2)) was relatively consistent for biomass at stem elongation and at anthesis and LAI at anthesis and grain yield with 21%, 23%, 21% and 26%, respectively. Seasonal water use was decreased from 320 to 301 mm (P = 0.10) by eCO (2), increasing water use efficiency for biomass and yield, 36% and 31%, respectively. The performance of six models (APSIM‐Wheat, APSIM‐Nwheat, CAT‐Wheat, CROPSYST, OLEARY‐CONNOR and SALUS) in simulating crop responses to eCO (2) was similar and within or close to the experimental error for accumulated biomass, yield and water use response, despite some variations in early growth and LAI. The primary mechanism of biomass accumulation via radiation use efficiency (RUE) or transpiration efficiency (TE) was not critical to define the overall response to eCO (2). However, under irrigation, the effect of late sowing on response to eCO (2) to biomass accumulation at DC65 was substantial in the observed data (~40%), but the simulated response was smaller, ranging from 17% to 28%. Simulated response from all six models under no water or nitrogen stress showed similar response to eCO (2) under irrigation, but the differences compared to the dryland treatment were small. Further experimental work on the interactive effects of eCO (2), water and temperature is required to resolve these model discrepancies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-02-06 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5016785/ /pubmed/25482824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12830 Text en © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Primary Research Articles
O'Leary, Garry J.
Christy, Brendan
Nuttall, James
Huth, Neil
Cammarano, Davide
Stöckle, Claudio
Basso, Bruno
Shcherbak, Iurii
Fitzgerald, Glenn
Luo, Qunying
Farre‐Codina, Immaculada
Palta, Jairo
Asseng, Senthold
Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO (2) under a Free‐Air CO (2) Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi‐arid environment
title Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO (2) under a Free‐Air CO (2) Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi‐arid environment
title_full Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO (2) under a Free‐Air CO (2) Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi‐arid environment
title_fullStr Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO (2) under a Free‐Air CO (2) Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi‐arid environment
title_full_unstemmed Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO (2) under a Free‐Air CO (2) Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi‐arid environment
title_short Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO (2) under a Free‐Air CO (2) Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi‐arid environment
title_sort response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated co (2) under a free‐air co (2) enrichment (face) experiment and modelling in a semi‐arid environment
topic Primary Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25482824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12830
work_keys_str_mv AT olearygarryj responseofwheatgrowthgrainyieldandwaterusetoelevatedco2underafreeairco2enrichmentfaceexperimentandmodellinginasemiaridenvironment
AT christybrendan responseofwheatgrowthgrainyieldandwaterusetoelevatedco2underafreeairco2enrichmentfaceexperimentandmodellinginasemiaridenvironment
AT nuttalljames responseofwheatgrowthgrainyieldandwaterusetoelevatedco2underafreeairco2enrichmentfaceexperimentandmodellinginasemiaridenvironment
AT huthneil responseofwheatgrowthgrainyieldandwaterusetoelevatedco2underafreeairco2enrichmentfaceexperimentandmodellinginasemiaridenvironment
AT cammaranodavide responseofwheatgrowthgrainyieldandwaterusetoelevatedco2underafreeairco2enrichmentfaceexperimentandmodellinginasemiaridenvironment
AT stockleclaudio responseofwheatgrowthgrainyieldandwaterusetoelevatedco2underafreeairco2enrichmentfaceexperimentandmodellinginasemiaridenvironment
AT bassobruno responseofwheatgrowthgrainyieldandwaterusetoelevatedco2underafreeairco2enrichmentfaceexperimentandmodellinginasemiaridenvironment
AT shcherbakiurii responseofwheatgrowthgrainyieldandwaterusetoelevatedco2underafreeairco2enrichmentfaceexperimentandmodellinginasemiaridenvironment
AT fitzgeraldglenn responseofwheatgrowthgrainyieldandwaterusetoelevatedco2underafreeairco2enrichmentfaceexperimentandmodellinginasemiaridenvironment
AT luoqunying responseofwheatgrowthgrainyieldandwaterusetoelevatedco2underafreeairco2enrichmentfaceexperimentandmodellinginasemiaridenvironment
AT farrecodinaimmaculada responseofwheatgrowthgrainyieldandwaterusetoelevatedco2underafreeairco2enrichmentfaceexperimentandmodellinginasemiaridenvironment
AT paltajairo responseofwheatgrowthgrainyieldandwaterusetoelevatedco2underafreeairco2enrichmentfaceexperimentandmodellinginasemiaridenvironment
AT assengsenthold responseofwheatgrowthgrainyieldandwaterusetoelevatedco2underafreeairco2enrichmentfaceexperimentandmodellinginasemiaridenvironment