Cargando…

Advances in biodiversity: metagenomics and the unveiling of biological dark matter

BACKGROUND: Efforts to harmonize genomic data standards used by the biodiversity and metagenomic research communities have shown that prokaryotic data cannot be understood or represented in a traditional, classical biological context for conceptual reasons, not technical ones. RESULTS: Biology, like...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robbins, Robert J., Krishtalka, Leonard, Wooley, John C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27617059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40793-016-0180-8
_version_ 1782452639121801216
author Robbins, Robert J.
Krishtalka, Leonard
Wooley, John C.
author_facet Robbins, Robert J.
Krishtalka, Leonard
Wooley, John C.
author_sort Robbins, Robert J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Efforts to harmonize genomic data standards used by the biodiversity and metagenomic research communities have shown that prokaryotic data cannot be understood or represented in a traditional, classical biological context for conceptual reasons, not technical ones. RESULTS: Biology, like physics, has a fundamental duality—the classical macroscale eukaryotic realm vs. the quantum microscale microbial realm—with the two realms differing profoundly, and counter-intuitively, from one another. Just as classical physics is emergent from and cannot explain the microscale realm of quantum physics, so classical biology is emergent from and cannot explain the microscale realm of prokaryotic life. Classical biology describes the familiar, macroscale realm of multi-cellular eukaryotic organisms, which constitute a highly derived and constrained evolutionary subset of the biosphere, unrepresentative of the vast, mostly unseen, microbial world of prokaryotic life that comprises at least half of the planet’s biomass and most of its genetic diversity. The two realms occupy fundamentally different mega-niches: eukaryotes interact primarily mechanically with the environment, prokaryotes primarily physiologically. Further, many foundational tenets of classical biology simply do not apply to prokaryotic biology. CONCLUSIONS: Classical genetics one held that genes, arranged on chromosomes like beads on a string, were the fundamental units of mutation, recombination, and heredity. Then, molecular analysis showed that there were no fundamental units, no beads, no string. Similarly, classical biology asserts that individual organisms and species are fundamental units of ecology, evolution, and biodiversity, composing an evolutionary history of objectively real, lineage-defined groups in a single-rooted tree of life. Now, metagenomic tools are forcing a recognition that there are no completely objective individuals, no unique lineages, and no one true tree. The newly revealed biosphere of microbial dark matter cannot be understood merely by extending the concepts and methods of eukaryotic macrobiology. The unveiling of biological dark matter is allowing us to see, for the first time, the diversity of the entire biosphere and, to paraphrase Darwin, is providing a new view of life. Advancing and understanding that view will require major revisions to some of the most fundamental concepts and theories in biology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5016886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50168862016-09-10 Advances in biodiversity: metagenomics and the unveiling of biological dark matter Robbins, Robert J. Krishtalka, Leonard Wooley, John C. Stand Genomic Sci Review Article BACKGROUND: Efforts to harmonize genomic data standards used by the biodiversity and metagenomic research communities have shown that prokaryotic data cannot be understood or represented in a traditional, classical biological context for conceptual reasons, not technical ones. RESULTS: Biology, like physics, has a fundamental duality—the classical macroscale eukaryotic realm vs. the quantum microscale microbial realm—with the two realms differing profoundly, and counter-intuitively, from one another. Just as classical physics is emergent from and cannot explain the microscale realm of quantum physics, so classical biology is emergent from and cannot explain the microscale realm of prokaryotic life. Classical biology describes the familiar, macroscale realm of multi-cellular eukaryotic organisms, which constitute a highly derived and constrained evolutionary subset of the biosphere, unrepresentative of the vast, mostly unseen, microbial world of prokaryotic life that comprises at least half of the planet’s biomass and most of its genetic diversity. The two realms occupy fundamentally different mega-niches: eukaryotes interact primarily mechanically with the environment, prokaryotes primarily physiologically. Further, many foundational tenets of classical biology simply do not apply to prokaryotic biology. CONCLUSIONS: Classical genetics one held that genes, arranged on chromosomes like beads on a string, were the fundamental units of mutation, recombination, and heredity. Then, molecular analysis showed that there were no fundamental units, no beads, no string. Similarly, classical biology asserts that individual organisms and species are fundamental units of ecology, evolution, and biodiversity, composing an evolutionary history of objectively real, lineage-defined groups in a single-rooted tree of life. Now, metagenomic tools are forcing a recognition that there are no completely objective individuals, no unique lineages, and no one true tree. The newly revealed biosphere of microbial dark matter cannot be understood merely by extending the concepts and methods of eukaryotic macrobiology. The unveiling of biological dark matter is allowing us to see, for the first time, the diversity of the entire biosphere and, to paraphrase Darwin, is providing a new view of life. Advancing and understanding that view will require major revisions to some of the most fundamental concepts and theories in biology. BioMed Central 2016-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5016886/ /pubmed/27617059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40793-016-0180-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review Article
Robbins, Robert J.
Krishtalka, Leonard
Wooley, John C.
Advances in biodiversity: metagenomics and the unveiling of biological dark matter
title Advances in biodiversity: metagenomics and the unveiling of biological dark matter
title_full Advances in biodiversity: metagenomics and the unveiling of biological dark matter
title_fullStr Advances in biodiversity: metagenomics and the unveiling of biological dark matter
title_full_unstemmed Advances in biodiversity: metagenomics and the unveiling of biological dark matter
title_short Advances in biodiversity: metagenomics and the unveiling of biological dark matter
title_sort advances in biodiversity: metagenomics and the unveiling of biological dark matter
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27617059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40793-016-0180-8
work_keys_str_mv AT robbinsrobertj advancesinbiodiversitymetagenomicsandtheunveilingofbiologicaldarkmatter
AT krishtalkaleonard advancesinbiodiversitymetagenomicsandtheunveilingofbiologicaldarkmatter
AT wooleyjohnc advancesinbiodiversitymetagenomicsandtheunveilingofbiologicaldarkmatter