Cargando…

Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks

BACKGROUND: Several recent studies have used the Minimum Dominating Set (MDS) model to identify driver nodes, which provide the control of the underlying networks, in protein interaction networks. There may exist multiple MDS configurations in a given network, thus it is difficult to determine which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiao-Fei, Ou-Yang, Le, Dai, Dao-Qing, Wu, Meng-Yun, Zhu, Yuan, Yan, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27612563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1233-0
_version_ 1782452639346196480
author Zhang, Xiao-Fei
Ou-Yang, Le
Dai, Dao-Qing
Wu, Meng-Yun
Zhu, Yuan
Yan, Hong
author_facet Zhang, Xiao-Fei
Ou-Yang, Le
Dai, Dao-Qing
Wu, Meng-Yun
Zhu, Yuan
Yan, Hong
author_sort Zhang, Xiao-Fei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several recent studies have used the Minimum Dominating Set (MDS) model to identify driver nodes, which provide the control of the underlying networks, in protein interaction networks. There may exist multiple MDS configurations in a given network, thus it is difficult to determine which one represents the real set of driver nodes. Because these previous studies only focus on static networks and ignore the contextual information on particular tissues, their findings could be insufficient or even be misleading. RESULTS: In this study, we develop a Collective-Influence-corrected Minimum Dominating Set (CI-MDS) model which takes into account the collective influence of proteins. By integrating molecular expression profiles and static protein interactions, 16 tissue-specific networks are established as well. We then apply the CI-MDS model to each tissue-specific network to detect MDS proteins. It generates almost the same MDSs when it is solved using different optimization algorithms. In addition, we classify MDS proteins into Tissue-Specific MDS (TS-MDS) proteins and HouseKeeping MDS (HK-MDS) proteins based on the number of tissues in which they are expressed and identified as MDS proteins. Notably, we find that TS-MDS proteins and HK-MDS proteins have significantly different topological and functional properties. HK-MDS proteins are more central in protein interaction networks, associated with more functions, evolving more slowly and subjected to a greater number of post-translational modifications than TS-MDS proteins. Unlike TS-MDS proteins, HK-MDS proteins significantly correspond to essential genes, ageing genes, virus-targeted proteins, transcription factors and protein kinases. Moreover, we find that besides HK-MDS proteins, many TS-MDS proteins are also linked to disease related genes, suggesting the tissue specificity of human diseases. Furthermore, functional enrichment analysis reveals that HK-MDS proteins carry out universally necessary biological processes and TS-MDS proteins usually involve in tissue-dependent functions. CONCLUSIONS: Our study uncovers key features of TS-MDS proteins and HK-MDS proteins, and is a step forward towards a better understanding of the controllability of human interactomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1233-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5016887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50168872016-09-19 Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks Zhang, Xiao-Fei Ou-Yang, Le Dai, Dao-Qing Wu, Meng-Yun Zhu, Yuan Yan, Hong BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Several recent studies have used the Minimum Dominating Set (MDS) model to identify driver nodes, which provide the control of the underlying networks, in protein interaction networks. There may exist multiple MDS configurations in a given network, thus it is difficult to determine which one represents the real set of driver nodes. Because these previous studies only focus on static networks and ignore the contextual information on particular tissues, their findings could be insufficient or even be misleading. RESULTS: In this study, we develop a Collective-Influence-corrected Minimum Dominating Set (CI-MDS) model which takes into account the collective influence of proteins. By integrating molecular expression profiles and static protein interactions, 16 tissue-specific networks are established as well. We then apply the CI-MDS model to each tissue-specific network to detect MDS proteins. It generates almost the same MDSs when it is solved using different optimization algorithms. In addition, we classify MDS proteins into Tissue-Specific MDS (TS-MDS) proteins and HouseKeeping MDS (HK-MDS) proteins based on the number of tissues in which they are expressed and identified as MDS proteins. Notably, we find that TS-MDS proteins and HK-MDS proteins have significantly different topological and functional properties. HK-MDS proteins are more central in protein interaction networks, associated with more functions, evolving more slowly and subjected to a greater number of post-translational modifications than TS-MDS proteins. Unlike TS-MDS proteins, HK-MDS proteins significantly correspond to essential genes, ageing genes, virus-targeted proteins, transcription factors and protein kinases. Moreover, we find that besides HK-MDS proteins, many TS-MDS proteins are also linked to disease related genes, suggesting the tissue specificity of human diseases. Furthermore, functional enrichment analysis reveals that HK-MDS proteins carry out universally necessary biological processes and TS-MDS proteins usually involve in tissue-dependent functions. CONCLUSIONS: Our study uncovers key features of TS-MDS proteins and HK-MDS proteins, and is a step forward towards a better understanding of the controllability of human interactomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1233-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5016887/ /pubmed/27612563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1233-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Xiao-Fei
Ou-Yang, Le
Dai, Dao-Qing
Wu, Meng-Yun
Zhu, Yuan
Yan, Hong
Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks
title Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks
title_full Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks
title_short Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks
title_sort comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27612563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1233-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiaofei comparativeanalysisofhousekeepingandtissuespecificdrivernodesinhumanproteininteractionnetworks
AT ouyangle comparativeanalysisofhousekeepingandtissuespecificdrivernodesinhumanproteininteractionnetworks
AT daidaoqing comparativeanalysisofhousekeepingandtissuespecificdrivernodesinhumanproteininteractionnetworks
AT wumengyun comparativeanalysisofhousekeepingandtissuespecificdrivernodesinhumanproteininteractionnetworks
AT zhuyuan comparativeanalysisofhousekeepingandtissuespecificdrivernodesinhumanproteininteractionnetworks
AT yanhong comparativeanalysisofhousekeepingandtissuespecificdrivernodesinhumanproteininteractionnetworks