Cargando…

Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: One in three women who have a prolapse operation will go on to have another operation, though not necessarily in the same compartment. Surgery can result in greater impairment of quality of life than the original prolapse itself (such as the development of new-onset urinary incontinence,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glazener, Cathryn, Constable, Lynda, Hemming, Christine, Breeman, Suzanne, Elders, Andrew, Cooper, Kevin, Freeman, Robert, Smith, Anthony R. B., Hagen, Suzanne, McDonald, Alison, McPherson, Gladys, Montgomery, Isobel, Kilonzo, Mary, Boyers, Dwayne, Goulao, Beatriz, Norrie, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27609058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1576-x
_version_ 1782452655189131264
author Glazener, Cathryn
Constable, Lynda
Hemming, Christine
Breeman, Suzanne
Elders, Andrew
Cooper, Kevin
Freeman, Robert
Smith, Anthony R. B.
Hagen, Suzanne
McDonald, Alison
McPherson, Gladys
Montgomery, Isobel
Kilonzo, Mary
Boyers, Dwayne
Goulao, Beatriz
Norrie, John
author_facet Glazener, Cathryn
Constable, Lynda
Hemming, Christine
Breeman, Suzanne
Elders, Andrew
Cooper, Kevin
Freeman, Robert
Smith, Anthony R. B.
Hagen, Suzanne
McDonald, Alison
McPherson, Gladys
Montgomery, Isobel
Kilonzo, Mary
Boyers, Dwayne
Goulao, Beatriz
Norrie, John
author_sort Glazener, Cathryn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One in three women who have a prolapse operation will go on to have another operation, though not necessarily in the same compartment. Surgery can result in greater impairment of quality of life than the original prolapse itself (such as the development of new-onset urinary incontinence, or prolapse at a different site). Anterior and posterior prolapse surgery is most common (90 % of operations), but around 43 % of women also have a uterine (34 %) or vault (9 %) procedure at the same time. There is not enough evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to guide management of vault or uterine prolapse. The Vault or Uterine prolapse surgery Evaluation (VUE) study aims to assess the surgical management of upper compartment pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in terms of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and adverse events. METHODS/DESIGN: VUE is two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, RCTs (Uterine Trial and Vault Trial). Eligible for inclusion are women with vault or uterine prolapse: requiring a surgical procedure, suitable for randomisation and willing to be randomised. Randomisation will be computer-allocated separately for each trial, minimised on: requiring concomitant anterior and/or posterior POP surgery or not, concomitant incontinence surgery or not, age (under 60 years or 60 years and older) and surgeon. Participants will be randomly assigned, with equal probability to intervention or control arms in either the Uterine Trial or the Vault Trial. Uterine Trial participants will receive either a vaginal hysterectomy or a uterine preservation procedure. Vault Trial participants will receive either a vaginal sacrospinous fixation or an abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Participants will be followed up by postal questionnaires (6 months post surgery and 12 months post randomisation) and also reviewed in clinic 12 months post surgery. The primary outcome is the participant-reported Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS) at 12 months post randomisation. DISCUSSION: Demonstrating the efficacy of vault and uterine prolapse surgeries is relevant not only to patients and clinicians but also to health care providers, both in the UK and globally. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN86784244 (assigned 19 October 2012), and the first subject was randomly assigned on 1 May 2013  ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1576-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5016955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50169552016-09-10 Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Glazener, Cathryn Constable, Lynda Hemming, Christine Breeman, Suzanne Elders, Andrew Cooper, Kevin Freeman, Robert Smith, Anthony R. B. Hagen, Suzanne McDonald, Alison McPherson, Gladys Montgomery, Isobel Kilonzo, Mary Boyers, Dwayne Goulao, Beatriz Norrie, John Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: One in three women who have a prolapse operation will go on to have another operation, though not necessarily in the same compartment. Surgery can result in greater impairment of quality of life than the original prolapse itself (such as the development of new-onset urinary incontinence, or prolapse at a different site). Anterior and posterior prolapse surgery is most common (90 % of operations), but around 43 % of women also have a uterine (34 %) or vault (9 %) procedure at the same time. There is not enough evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to guide management of vault or uterine prolapse. The Vault or Uterine prolapse surgery Evaluation (VUE) study aims to assess the surgical management of upper compartment pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in terms of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and adverse events. METHODS/DESIGN: VUE is two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, RCTs (Uterine Trial and Vault Trial). Eligible for inclusion are women with vault or uterine prolapse: requiring a surgical procedure, suitable for randomisation and willing to be randomised. Randomisation will be computer-allocated separately for each trial, minimised on: requiring concomitant anterior and/or posterior POP surgery or not, concomitant incontinence surgery or not, age (under 60 years or 60 years and older) and surgeon. Participants will be randomly assigned, with equal probability to intervention or control arms in either the Uterine Trial or the Vault Trial. Uterine Trial participants will receive either a vaginal hysterectomy or a uterine preservation procedure. Vault Trial participants will receive either a vaginal sacrospinous fixation or an abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Participants will be followed up by postal questionnaires (6 months post surgery and 12 months post randomisation) and also reviewed in clinic 12 months post surgery. The primary outcome is the participant-reported Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS) at 12 months post randomisation. DISCUSSION: Demonstrating the efficacy of vault and uterine prolapse surgeries is relevant not only to patients and clinicians but also to health care providers, both in the UK and globally. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN86784244 (assigned 19 October 2012), and the first subject was randomly assigned on 1 May 2013  ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1576-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5016955/ /pubmed/27609058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1576-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Glazener, Cathryn
Constable, Lynda
Hemming, Christine
Breeman, Suzanne
Elders, Andrew
Cooper, Kevin
Freeman, Robert
Smith, Anthony R. B.
Hagen, Suzanne
McDonald, Alison
McPherson, Gladys
Montgomery, Isobel
Kilonzo, Mary
Boyers, Dwayne
Goulao, Beatriz
Norrie, John
Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort two parallel, pragmatic, uk multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the vue study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27609058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1576-x
work_keys_str_mv AT glazenercathryn twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT constablelynda twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hemmingchristine twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT breemansuzanne twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT eldersandrew twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cooperkevin twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT freemanrobert twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT smithanthonyrb twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hagensuzanne twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcdonaldalison twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcphersongladys twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT montgomeryisobel twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kilonzomary twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT boyersdwayne twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT goulaobeatriz twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT norriejohn twoparallelpragmaticukmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialscomparingsurgicaloptionsforuppercompartmentvaultoruterinepelvicorganprolapsethevuestudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial