Cargando…
Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass
OBJECTIVES: Comparison of effects of propofol and isosorbide dinitrate during rewarming on cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing coronary artery bypasses grafting. METHODS: It was randomized prospective clinical trial. One hundred and twenty patient (120) undergoing CABG surgery were include...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Professional Medical Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648018 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.10190 |
_version_ | 1782452678636339200 |
---|---|
author | Furqan, Aamir Ahmad, Sohail Ali, Liaqat Akhtar, Rahat Baig, Mr. Mirza Ahmad Raza Altaf, Rana |
author_facet | Furqan, Aamir Ahmad, Sohail Ali, Liaqat Akhtar, Rahat Baig, Mr. Mirza Ahmad Raza Altaf, Rana |
author_sort | Furqan, Aamir |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Comparison of effects of propofol and isosorbide dinitrate during rewarming on cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing coronary artery bypasses grafting. METHODS: It was randomized prospective clinical trial. One hundred and twenty patient (120) undergoing CABG surgery were included in this study. Group-I (Study group, n=60): in which only propofol infusion used during rewarming and Group-II (control Group, n=60) in which isosorbide dinitrate and propofol infusion combination was used during rewarming. The data was entered and analyzed through SPSS Version 19. Independent sample T-test and chi-square test were used for data analysis. P value of ≤ 0.05 was taken as significant. RESULTS: Mean arterial pressures during rewarming were 63.41±3.61 mmHg in propofol group versus 60.80±4.86 mmHg in control group (p-value 0.001). Core temperature on weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass was 37.11±0.49 °C in propofol group and 37.00±0.18 °C in control group. After drop in core temperature was little more in propofol group (1.02±0.36 °C) versus 0.96±0.37 °C in control group but this difference was not statistically significant (p-value 0.41). Mean Ventilation time after surgery in propofol group was 4.65±0.65 hours versus 5.03±0.81 hours in control group (p-value 0.006). CONCLUSION: Propofol alone is capable of fulfilling the requirements of adequate rewarming during Cardiopulmonary bypass and can produce more hemodynamic stability and early post-operative recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5017081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Professional Medical Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50170812016-09-19 Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass Furqan, Aamir Ahmad, Sohail Ali, Liaqat Akhtar, Rahat Baig, Mr. Mirza Ahmad Raza Altaf, Rana Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: Comparison of effects of propofol and isosorbide dinitrate during rewarming on cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing coronary artery bypasses grafting. METHODS: It was randomized prospective clinical trial. One hundred and twenty patient (120) undergoing CABG surgery were included in this study. Group-I (Study group, n=60): in which only propofol infusion used during rewarming and Group-II (control Group, n=60) in which isosorbide dinitrate and propofol infusion combination was used during rewarming. The data was entered and analyzed through SPSS Version 19. Independent sample T-test and chi-square test were used for data analysis. P value of ≤ 0.05 was taken as significant. RESULTS: Mean arterial pressures during rewarming were 63.41±3.61 mmHg in propofol group versus 60.80±4.86 mmHg in control group (p-value 0.001). Core temperature on weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass was 37.11±0.49 °C in propofol group and 37.00±0.18 °C in control group. After drop in core temperature was little more in propofol group (1.02±0.36 °C) versus 0.96±0.37 °C in control group but this difference was not statistically significant (p-value 0.41). Mean Ventilation time after surgery in propofol group was 4.65±0.65 hours versus 5.03±0.81 hours in control group (p-value 0.006). CONCLUSION: Propofol alone is capable of fulfilling the requirements of adequate rewarming during Cardiopulmonary bypass and can produce more hemodynamic stability and early post-operative recovery. Professional Medical Publications 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5017081/ /pubmed/27648018 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.10190 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Furqan, Aamir Ahmad, Sohail Ali, Liaqat Akhtar, Rahat Baig, Mr. Mirza Ahmad Raza Altaf, Rana Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass |
title | Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass |
title_full | Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass |
title_short | Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass |
title_sort | comparison of effects of propofol and isosorbide dinitrate during rewarming on cardiopulmonary bypass |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648018 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.10190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT furqanaamir comparisonofeffectsofpropofolandisosorbidedinitrateduringrewarmingoncardiopulmonarybypass AT ahmadsohail comparisonofeffectsofpropofolandisosorbidedinitrateduringrewarmingoncardiopulmonarybypass AT aliliaqat comparisonofeffectsofpropofolandisosorbidedinitrateduringrewarmingoncardiopulmonarybypass AT akhtarrahat comparisonofeffectsofpropofolandisosorbidedinitrateduringrewarmingoncardiopulmonarybypass AT baigmrmirzaahmadraza comparisonofeffectsofpropofolandisosorbidedinitrateduringrewarmingoncardiopulmonarybypass AT altafrana comparisonofeffectsofpropofolandisosorbidedinitrateduringrewarmingoncardiopulmonarybypass |