Cargando…

Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass

OBJECTIVES: Comparison of effects of propofol and isosorbide dinitrate during rewarming on cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing coronary artery bypasses grafting. METHODS: It was randomized prospective clinical trial. One hundred and twenty patient (120) undergoing CABG surgery were include...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furqan, Aamir, Ahmad, Sohail, Ali, Liaqat, Akhtar, Rahat, Baig, Mr. Mirza Ahmad Raza, Altaf, Rana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648018
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.10190
_version_ 1782452678636339200
author Furqan, Aamir
Ahmad, Sohail
Ali, Liaqat
Akhtar, Rahat
Baig, Mr. Mirza Ahmad Raza
Altaf, Rana
author_facet Furqan, Aamir
Ahmad, Sohail
Ali, Liaqat
Akhtar, Rahat
Baig, Mr. Mirza Ahmad Raza
Altaf, Rana
author_sort Furqan, Aamir
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Comparison of effects of propofol and isosorbide dinitrate during rewarming on cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing coronary artery bypasses grafting. METHODS: It was randomized prospective clinical trial. One hundred and twenty patient (120) undergoing CABG surgery were included in this study. Group-I (Study group, n=60): in which only propofol infusion used during rewarming and Group-II (control Group, n=60) in which isosorbide dinitrate and propofol infusion combination was used during rewarming. The data was entered and analyzed through SPSS Version 19. Independent sample T-test and chi-square test were used for data analysis. P value of ≤ 0.05 was taken as significant. RESULTS: Mean arterial pressures during rewarming were 63.41±3.61 mmHg in propofol group versus 60.80±4.86 mmHg in control group (p-value 0.001). Core temperature on weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass was 37.11±0.49 °C in propofol group and 37.00±0.18 °C in control group. After drop in core temperature was little more in propofol group (1.02±0.36 °C) versus 0.96±0.37 °C in control group but this difference was not statistically significant (p-value 0.41). Mean Ventilation time after surgery in propofol group was 4.65±0.65 hours versus 5.03±0.81 hours in control group (p-value 0.006). CONCLUSION: Propofol alone is capable of fulfilling the requirements of adequate rewarming during Cardiopulmonary bypass and can produce more hemodynamic stability and early post-operative recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5017081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50170812016-09-19 Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass Furqan, Aamir Ahmad, Sohail Ali, Liaqat Akhtar, Rahat Baig, Mr. Mirza Ahmad Raza Altaf, Rana Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: Comparison of effects of propofol and isosorbide dinitrate during rewarming on cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing coronary artery bypasses grafting. METHODS: It was randomized prospective clinical trial. One hundred and twenty patient (120) undergoing CABG surgery were included in this study. Group-I (Study group, n=60): in which only propofol infusion used during rewarming and Group-II (control Group, n=60) in which isosorbide dinitrate and propofol infusion combination was used during rewarming. The data was entered and analyzed through SPSS Version 19. Independent sample T-test and chi-square test were used for data analysis. P value of ≤ 0.05 was taken as significant. RESULTS: Mean arterial pressures during rewarming were 63.41±3.61 mmHg in propofol group versus 60.80±4.86 mmHg in control group (p-value 0.001). Core temperature on weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass was 37.11±0.49 °C in propofol group and 37.00±0.18 °C in control group. After drop in core temperature was little more in propofol group (1.02±0.36 °C) versus 0.96±0.37 °C in control group but this difference was not statistically significant (p-value 0.41). Mean Ventilation time after surgery in propofol group was 4.65±0.65 hours versus 5.03±0.81 hours in control group (p-value 0.006). CONCLUSION: Propofol alone is capable of fulfilling the requirements of adequate rewarming during Cardiopulmonary bypass and can produce more hemodynamic stability and early post-operative recovery. Professional Medical Publications 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5017081/ /pubmed/27648018 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.10190 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Furqan, Aamir
Ahmad, Sohail
Ali, Liaqat
Akhtar, Rahat
Baig, Mr. Mirza Ahmad Raza
Altaf, Rana
Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass
title Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass
title_full Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass
title_fullStr Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass
title_short Comparison of Effects of Propofol and Isosorbide Dinitrate during Rewarming on Cardiopulmonary Bypass
title_sort comparison of effects of propofol and isosorbide dinitrate during rewarming on cardiopulmonary bypass
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648018
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.10190
work_keys_str_mv AT furqanaamir comparisonofeffectsofpropofolandisosorbidedinitrateduringrewarmingoncardiopulmonarybypass
AT ahmadsohail comparisonofeffectsofpropofolandisosorbidedinitrateduringrewarmingoncardiopulmonarybypass
AT aliliaqat comparisonofeffectsofpropofolandisosorbidedinitrateduringrewarmingoncardiopulmonarybypass
AT akhtarrahat comparisonofeffectsofpropofolandisosorbidedinitrateduringrewarmingoncardiopulmonarybypass
AT baigmrmirzaahmadraza comparisonofeffectsofpropofolandisosorbidedinitrateduringrewarmingoncardiopulmonarybypass
AT altafrana comparisonofeffectsofpropofolandisosorbidedinitrateduringrewarmingoncardiopulmonarybypass