Cargando…

Measured versus calculated LDL-cholesterol in subjects with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: There is a strong positive association between increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and coronary heart disease (CHD). The accuracy of LDL-C estimation is essential and critically important. The aim of present study was to compare calculated LDL-C with direct homogeneous a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fawwad, Asher, Sabir, Rubina, Riaz, Musarrat, Moin, Hassan, Basit, Abdul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648047
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.9896
_version_ 1782452685365051392
author Fawwad, Asher
Sabir, Rubina
Riaz, Musarrat
Moin, Hassan
Basit, Abdul
author_facet Fawwad, Asher
Sabir, Rubina
Riaz, Musarrat
Moin, Hassan
Basit, Abdul
author_sort Fawwad, Asher
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There is a strong positive association between increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and coronary heart disease (CHD). The accuracy of LDL-C estimation is essential and critically important. The aim of present study was to compare calculated LDL-C with direct homogeneous assay in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This observational study was carried out at Baqai Institute of Diabetology and Endocrinology (BIDE) from January 2011 to December 2013. A total of 9620 patients with type 2 diabetes were included in the study. Fasting blood glucose, total Cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were obtained using standard methods. Calculated LDL-C was obtained by Friedewald formula. RESULTS: Mean difference of measured and calculated LDL-C was found to be -0.25, 6.63 and 46.55 mg/dl at triglyceride levels < 150 mg/dl, 150 - 400 mg/dl and ≥ 400 mg/dl, respectively. The result shows that the difference between measured and calculated LDL-C increases as the triglyceride level increases. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study suggested that calculated LDL-C was lower, as compared to measured LDL-C, which may cause misclassifications that may have an impact on therapeutic decisions in patients with diabetes. Calculated LDL-C may depend on triglyceride levels so LDL-C should be measured by direct assay in routine clinical laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5017110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50171102016-09-19 Measured versus calculated LDL-cholesterol in subjects with type 2 diabetes Fawwad, Asher Sabir, Rubina Riaz, Musarrat Moin, Hassan Basit, Abdul Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: There is a strong positive association between increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and coronary heart disease (CHD). The accuracy of LDL-C estimation is essential and critically important. The aim of present study was to compare calculated LDL-C with direct homogeneous assay in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This observational study was carried out at Baqai Institute of Diabetology and Endocrinology (BIDE) from January 2011 to December 2013. A total of 9620 patients with type 2 diabetes were included in the study. Fasting blood glucose, total Cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were obtained using standard methods. Calculated LDL-C was obtained by Friedewald formula. RESULTS: Mean difference of measured and calculated LDL-C was found to be -0.25, 6.63 and 46.55 mg/dl at triglyceride levels < 150 mg/dl, 150 - 400 mg/dl and ≥ 400 mg/dl, respectively. The result shows that the difference between measured and calculated LDL-C increases as the triglyceride level increases. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study suggested that calculated LDL-C was lower, as compared to measured LDL-C, which may cause misclassifications that may have an impact on therapeutic decisions in patients with diabetes. Calculated LDL-C may depend on triglyceride levels so LDL-C should be measured by direct assay in routine clinical laboratories. Professional Medical Publications 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5017110/ /pubmed/27648047 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.9896 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fawwad, Asher
Sabir, Rubina
Riaz, Musarrat
Moin, Hassan
Basit, Abdul
Measured versus calculated LDL-cholesterol in subjects with type 2 diabetes
title Measured versus calculated LDL-cholesterol in subjects with type 2 diabetes
title_full Measured versus calculated LDL-cholesterol in subjects with type 2 diabetes
title_fullStr Measured versus calculated LDL-cholesterol in subjects with type 2 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Measured versus calculated LDL-cholesterol in subjects with type 2 diabetes
title_short Measured versus calculated LDL-cholesterol in subjects with type 2 diabetes
title_sort measured versus calculated ldl-cholesterol in subjects with type 2 diabetes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27648047
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.9896
work_keys_str_mv AT fawwadasher measuredversuscalculatedldlcholesterolinsubjectswithtype2diabetes
AT sabirrubina measuredversuscalculatedldlcholesterolinsubjectswithtype2diabetes
AT riazmusarrat measuredversuscalculatedldlcholesterolinsubjectswithtype2diabetes
AT moinhassan measuredversuscalculatedldlcholesterolinsubjectswithtype2diabetes
AT basitabdul measuredversuscalculatedldlcholesterolinsubjectswithtype2diabetes