Cargando…

Patient - implant dimension mismatch in total knee arthroplasty: Is it worth worrying? An Indian scenario

BACKGROUND: The correct sizing of the components in both anteroposterior and mediolateral (ML) dimensions is crucial for the success of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The size of the implants selected is based on the intraoperative measurements. The currently used TKA implants available to us are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thilak, Jai, George, Melvin J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27746494
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.189618
_version_ 1782452696880513024
author Thilak, Jai
George, Melvin J
author_facet Thilak, Jai
George, Melvin J
author_sort Thilak, Jai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The correct sizing of the components in both anteroposterior and mediolateral (ML) dimensions is crucial for the success of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The size of the implants selected is based on the intraoperative measurements. The currently used TKA implants available to us are based on morphometric measurements obtained from a Western/Caucasian population. Hence, the risk of component ML mismatch is more common in Asian sub-population, as they are of a smaller built and stature. This study aims to look into the following aspects agnitude of the ML mismatch between the femoral component and the patient's anatomical dimension, evaluation of gender variations in distal femur dimensions, and gender-wise and implant-wise correlation of ML mismatch. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intraoperatively, the distal femoral dimensions were measured using sterile calipers after removing the osteophytes and compared with the ML dimension of the implant used. ML mismatch length thus obtained is correlated with the various parameters. RESULTS: Males showed larger distal femoral dimensions when compared to females. Males had larger ML mismatch. None of the implants used perfectly matched the patient's anatomical dimensions. Patients with larger mismatch had lower scorings at 2 years postoperative followup. CONCLUSION: Implant manufacturers need to design more options of femoral implants for a better fit in our subset of patients. The exact magnitude of mismatch which can cause functional implications need to be made out. The mismatch being one of the important factors for the success of the surgery, we should focus more on this aspect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5017173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50171732016-10-14 Patient - implant dimension mismatch in total knee arthroplasty: Is it worth worrying? An Indian scenario Thilak, Jai George, Melvin J Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: The correct sizing of the components in both anteroposterior and mediolateral (ML) dimensions is crucial for the success of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The size of the implants selected is based on the intraoperative measurements. The currently used TKA implants available to us are based on morphometric measurements obtained from a Western/Caucasian population. Hence, the risk of component ML mismatch is more common in Asian sub-population, as they are of a smaller built and stature. This study aims to look into the following aspects agnitude of the ML mismatch between the femoral component and the patient's anatomical dimension, evaluation of gender variations in distal femur dimensions, and gender-wise and implant-wise correlation of ML mismatch. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intraoperatively, the distal femoral dimensions were measured using sterile calipers after removing the osteophytes and compared with the ML dimension of the implant used. ML mismatch length thus obtained is correlated with the various parameters. RESULTS: Males showed larger distal femoral dimensions when compared to females. Males had larger ML mismatch. None of the implants used perfectly matched the patient's anatomical dimensions. Patients with larger mismatch had lower scorings at 2 years postoperative followup. CONCLUSION: Implant manufacturers need to design more options of femoral implants for a better fit in our subset of patients. The exact magnitude of mismatch which can cause functional implications need to be made out. The mismatch being one of the important factors for the success of the surgery, we should focus more on this aspect. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5017173/ /pubmed/27746494 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.189618 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Thilak, Jai
George, Melvin J
Patient - implant dimension mismatch in total knee arthroplasty: Is it worth worrying? An Indian scenario
title Patient - implant dimension mismatch in total knee arthroplasty: Is it worth worrying? An Indian scenario
title_full Patient - implant dimension mismatch in total knee arthroplasty: Is it worth worrying? An Indian scenario
title_fullStr Patient - implant dimension mismatch in total knee arthroplasty: Is it worth worrying? An Indian scenario
title_full_unstemmed Patient - implant dimension mismatch in total knee arthroplasty: Is it worth worrying? An Indian scenario
title_short Patient - implant dimension mismatch in total knee arthroplasty: Is it worth worrying? An Indian scenario
title_sort patient - implant dimension mismatch in total knee arthroplasty: is it worth worrying? an indian scenario
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27746494
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.189618
work_keys_str_mv AT thilakjai patientimplantdimensionmismatchintotalkneearthroplastyisitworthworryinganindianscenario
AT georgemelvinj patientimplantdimensionmismatchintotalkneearthroplastyisitworthworryinganindianscenario