Cargando…

Respondent driven sampling of wheelchair users: A lack of traction?

Background: Internationally, wheelchair users are an emerging demographic phenomenon, due to their increased prevalence and rapidly increasing life-span. While having significant healthcare implications, basic robust epidemiological information about wheelchair users is often lacking due, in part, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourke, John A., Schluter, Philip J., Hay-Smith, E. Jean C., Snell, Deborah L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000Research 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27635221
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8605.2
_version_ 1782452716195282944
author Bourke, John A.
Schluter, Philip J.
Hay-Smith, E. Jean C.
Snell, Deborah L.
author_facet Bourke, John A.
Schluter, Philip J.
Hay-Smith, E. Jean C.
Snell, Deborah L.
author_sort Bourke, John A.
collection PubMed
description Background: Internationally, wheelchair users are an emerging demographic phenomenon, due to their increased prevalence and rapidly increasing life-span. While having significant healthcare implications, basic robust epidemiological information about wheelchair users is often lacking due, in part, to this population’s ‘hidden’ nature. Increasingly popular in epidemiological research, Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) provides a mechanism for generating unbiased population-based estimates for hard-to-reach populations, overcoming biases inherent within other sampling methods. This paper reports the first published study to employ RDS amongst wheelchair users. Methods: Between October 2015 and January 2016, a short, successfully piloted, internet-based national survey was initiated. Twenty seeds from diverse organisations were invited to complete the survey then circulate it to peers within their networks following a well-defined protocol. A predetermined reminder protocol was triggered when seeds or their peers failed to respond. All participants were entered into a draw for an iPad. Results: Overall, 19 people participated (nine women); 12 initial seeds, followed by seven second-wave participants arising from four seeds . Completion time for the survey ranged between 7 and 36 minutes. Despite repeated reminders, no further people were recruited. Discussion: While New Zealand wheelchair user numbers are unknown, an estimated 14% of people have physical impairments that limited mobility. The 19 respondents generated from adopting the RDS methodology here thus represents a negligible fraction of wheelchair users in New Zealand, and an insufficient number to ensure equilibrium required for unbiased analyses. While successful in other hard-to-reach populations, applying RDS methodology to wheelchair users requires further consideration. Formative research exploring areas of network characteristics, acceptability of RDS, appropriate incentive options, and seed selection amongst wheelchair users is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5017286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher F1000Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50172862016-09-14 Respondent driven sampling of wheelchair users: A lack of traction? Bourke, John A. Schluter, Philip J. Hay-Smith, E. Jean C. Snell, Deborah L. F1000Res Observation Article Background: Internationally, wheelchair users are an emerging demographic phenomenon, due to their increased prevalence and rapidly increasing life-span. While having significant healthcare implications, basic robust epidemiological information about wheelchair users is often lacking due, in part, to this population’s ‘hidden’ nature. Increasingly popular in epidemiological research, Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) provides a mechanism for generating unbiased population-based estimates for hard-to-reach populations, overcoming biases inherent within other sampling methods. This paper reports the first published study to employ RDS amongst wheelchair users. Methods: Between October 2015 and January 2016, a short, successfully piloted, internet-based national survey was initiated. Twenty seeds from diverse organisations were invited to complete the survey then circulate it to peers within their networks following a well-defined protocol. A predetermined reminder protocol was triggered when seeds or their peers failed to respond. All participants were entered into a draw for an iPad. Results: Overall, 19 people participated (nine women); 12 initial seeds, followed by seven second-wave participants arising from four seeds . Completion time for the survey ranged between 7 and 36 minutes. Despite repeated reminders, no further people were recruited. Discussion: While New Zealand wheelchair user numbers are unknown, an estimated 14% of people have physical impairments that limited mobility. The 19 respondents generated from adopting the RDS methodology here thus represents a negligible fraction of wheelchair users in New Zealand, and an insufficient number to ensure equilibrium required for unbiased analyses. While successful in other hard-to-reach populations, applying RDS methodology to wheelchair users requires further consideration. Formative research exploring areas of network characteristics, acceptability of RDS, appropriate incentive options, and seed selection amongst wheelchair users is needed. F1000Research 2016-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5017286/ /pubmed/27635221 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8605.2 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Bourke JA et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Observation Article
Bourke, John A.
Schluter, Philip J.
Hay-Smith, E. Jean C.
Snell, Deborah L.
Respondent driven sampling of wheelchair users: A lack of traction?
title Respondent driven sampling of wheelchair users: A lack of traction?
title_full Respondent driven sampling of wheelchair users: A lack of traction?
title_fullStr Respondent driven sampling of wheelchair users: A lack of traction?
title_full_unstemmed Respondent driven sampling of wheelchair users: A lack of traction?
title_short Respondent driven sampling of wheelchair users: A lack of traction?
title_sort respondent driven sampling of wheelchair users: a lack of traction?
topic Observation Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27635221
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8605.2
work_keys_str_mv AT bourkejohna respondentdrivensamplingofwheelchairusersalackoftraction
AT schluterphilipj respondentdrivensamplingofwheelchairusersalackoftraction
AT haysmithejeanc respondentdrivensamplingofwheelchairusersalackoftraction
AT snelldeborahl respondentdrivensamplingofwheelchairusersalackoftraction