Cargando…

Assessing the GOANNA Visual Field Algorithm Using Artificial Scotoma Generation on Human Observers

PURPOSE: To validate the performance of a new perimetric algorithm (Gradient-Oriented Automated Natural Neighbor Approach; GOANNA) in humans using a novel combination of computer simulation and human testing, which we call Artificial Scotoma Generation (ASG). METHODS: Fifteen healthy observers were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chong, Luke X., Turpin, Andrew, McKendrick, Allison M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27622080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.5.1
_version_ 1782452719828598784
author Chong, Luke X.
Turpin, Andrew
McKendrick, Allison M.
author_facet Chong, Luke X.
Turpin, Andrew
McKendrick, Allison M.
author_sort Chong, Luke X.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To validate the performance of a new perimetric algorithm (Gradient-Oriented Automated Natural Neighbor Approach; GOANNA) in humans using a novel combination of computer simulation and human testing, which we call Artificial Scotoma Generation (ASG). METHODS: Fifteen healthy observers were recruited. Baseline conventional automated perimetry was performed on the Octopus 900. Visual field sensitivity was measured using two different procedures: GOANNA and Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (ZEST). Four different scotoma types were induced in each observer by implementing a novel technique that inserts a step between the algorithm and the perimeter, which in turn alters presentation levels to simulate scotomata in human observers. Accuracy, precision, and unique number of locations tested were measured, with the maximum difference between a location and its neighbors (Max_d) used to stratify results. RESULTS: GOANNA sampled significantly more locations than ZEST (paired t-test, P < 0.001), while maintaining comparable test times. Difference plots showed that GOANNA displayed greater accuracy than ZEST when Max_d was in the 10 to 30 dB range (with the exception of Max_d = 20 dB; Wilcoxon, P < 0.001). Similarly, GOANNA demonstrated greater precision than ZEST when Max_d was in the 20 to 30 dB range (Wilcoxon, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We have introduced a novel method for assessing accuracy of perimetric algorithms in human observers. Results observed in the current study agreed with the results seen in earlier simulation studies, and thus provide support for performing larger scale clinical trials with GOANNA in the future. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The GOANNA perimetric testing algorithm offers a new paradigm for visual field testing where locations for testing are chosen that target scotoma borders. Further, the ASG methodology used in this paper to assess GOANNA shows promise as a hybrid between computer simulation and patient testing, which may allow more rapid development of new perimetric approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5017315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50173152016-09-12 Assessing the GOANNA Visual Field Algorithm Using Artificial Scotoma Generation on Human Observers Chong, Luke X. Turpin, Andrew McKendrick, Allison M. Transl Vis Sci Technol Articles PURPOSE: To validate the performance of a new perimetric algorithm (Gradient-Oriented Automated Natural Neighbor Approach; GOANNA) in humans using a novel combination of computer simulation and human testing, which we call Artificial Scotoma Generation (ASG). METHODS: Fifteen healthy observers were recruited. Baseline conventional automated perimetry was performed on the Octopus 900. Visual field sensitivity was measured using two different procedures: GOANNA and Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (ZEST). Four different scotoma types were induced in each observer by implementing a novel technique that inserts a step between the algorithm and the perimeter, which in turn alters presentation levels to simulate scotomata in human observers. Accuracy, precision, and unique number of locations tested were measured, with the maximum difference between a location and its neighbors (Max_d) used to stratify results. RESULTS: GOANNA sampled significantly more locations than ZEST (paired t-test, P < 0.001), while maintaining comparable test times. Difference plots showed that GOANNA displayed greater accuracy than ZEST when Max_d was in the 10 to 30 dB range (with the exception of Max_d = 20 dB; Wilcoxon, P < 0.001). Similarly, GOANNA demonstrated greater precision than ZEST when Max_d was in the 20 to 30 dB range (Wilcoxon, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We have introduced a novel method for assessing accuracy of perimetric algorithms in human observers. Results observed in the current study agreed with the results seen in earlier simulation studies, and thus provide support for performing larger scale clinical trials with GOANNA in the future. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The GOANNA perimetric testing algorithm offers a new paradigm for visual field testing where locations for testing are chosen that target scotoma borders. Further, the ASG methodology used in this paper to assess GOANNA shows promise as a hybrid between computer simulation and patient testing, which may allow more rapid development of new perimetric approaches. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5017315/ /pubmed/27622080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.5.1 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Chong, Luke X.
Turpin, Andrew
McKendrick, Allison M.
Assessing the GOANNA Visual Field Algorithm Using Artificial Scotoma Generation on Human Observers
title Assessing the GOANNA Visual Field Algorithm Using Artificial Scotoma Generation on Human Observers
title_full Assessing the GOANNA Visual Field Algorithm Using Artificial Scotoma Generation on Human Observers
title_fullStr Assessing the GOANNA Visual Field Algorithm Using Artificial Scotoma Generation on Human Observers
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the GOANNA Visual Field Algorithm Using Artificial Scotoma Generation on Human Observers
title_short Assessing the GOANNA Visual Field Algorithm Using Artificial Scotoma Generation on Human Observers
title_sort assessing the goanna visual field algorithm using artificial scotoma generation on human observers
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27622080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.5.1
work_keys_str_mv AT chonglukex assessingthegoannavisualfieldalgorithmusingartificialscotomagenerationonhumanobservers
AT turpinandrew assessingthegoannavisualfieldalgorithmusingartificialscotomagenerationonhumanobservers
AT mckendrickallisonm assessingthegoannavisualfieldalgorithmusingartificialscotomagenerationonhumanobservers