Cargando…

Factors Influencing Continuous Breath Signal in Intubated and Mechanically-Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients Measured by an Electronic Nose

Introduction: Continuous breath analysis by electronic nose (eNose) technology in the intensive care unit (ICU) may be useful in monitoring (patho) physiological changes. However, the application of breath monitoring in a non-controlled clinical setting introduces noise into the data. We hypothesize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leopold, Jan Hendrik, Abu-Hanna, Ameen, Colombo, Camilla, Sterk, Peter J., Schultz, Marcus J., Bos, Lieuwe D. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556467
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16081337
_version_ 1782452762691239936
author Leopold, Jan Hendrik
Abu-Hanna, Ameen
Colombo, Camilla
Sterk, Peter J.
Schultz, Marcus J.
Bos, Lieuwe D. J.
author_facet Leopold, Jan Hendrik
Abu-Hanna, Ameen
Colombo, Camilla
Sterk, Peter J.
Schultz, Marcus J.
Bos, Lieuwe D. J.
author_sort Leopold, Jan Hendrik
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Continuous breath analysis by electronic nose (eNose) technology in the intensive care unit (ICU) may be useful in monitoring (patho) physiological changes. However, the application of breath monitoring in a non-controlled clinical setting introduces noise into the data. We hypothesized that the sensor signal is influenced by: (1) humidity in the side-stream; (2) patient-ventilator disconnections and the nebulization of medication; and (3) changes in ventilator settings and the amount of exhaled CO(2). We aimed to explore whether the aforementioned factors introduce noise into the signal, and discuss several approaches to reduce this noise. Methods: Study in mechanically-ventilated ICU patients. Exhaled breath was monitored using a continuous eNose with metal oxide sensors. Linear (mixed) models were used to study hypothesized associations. Results: In total, 1251 h of eNose data were collected. First, the initial 15 min of the signal was discarded. There was a negative association between humidity and Sensor 1 (Fixed-effect β: −0.05 ± 0.002) and a positive association with Sensors 2–4 (Fixed-effect β: 0.12 ± 0.001); the signal was corrected for this noise. Outliers were most likely due to noise and therefore removed. Sensor values were positively associated with end-tidal CO(2), tidal volume and the pressure variables. The signal was corrected for changes in these ventilator variables after which the associations disappeared. Conclusion: Variations in humidity, ventilator disconnections, nebulization of medication and changes of ventilator settings indeed influenced exhaled breath signals measured in ventilated patients by continuous eNose analysis. We discussed several approaches to reduce the effects of these noise inducing variables.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5017501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50175012016-09-22 Factors Influencing Continuous Breath Signal in Intubated and Mechanically-Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients Measured by an Electronic Nose Leopold, Jan Hendrik Abu-Hanna, Ameen Colombo, Camilla Sterk, Peter J. Schultz, Marcus J. Bos, Lieuwe D. J. Sensors (Basel) Article Introduction: Continuous breath analysis by electronic nose (eNose) technology in the intensive care unit (ICU) may be useful in monitoring (patho) physiological changes. However, the application of breath monitoring in a non-controlled clinical setting introduces noise into the data. We hypothesized that the sensor signal is influenced by: (1) humidity in the side-stream; (2) patient-ventilator disconnections and the nebulization of medication; and (3) changes in ventilator settings and the amount of exhaled CO(2). We aimed to explore whether the aforementioned factors introduce noise into the signal, and discuss several approaches to reduce this noise. Methods: Study in mechanically-ventilated ICU patients. Exhaled breath was monitored using a continuous eNose with metal oxide sensors. Linear (mixed) models were used to study hypothesized associations. Results: In total, 1251 h of eNose data were collected. First, the initial 15 min of the signal was discarded. There was a negative association between humidity and Sensor 1 (Fixed-effect β: −0.05 ± 0.002) and a positive association with Sensors 2–4 (Fixed-effect β: 0.12 ± 0.001); the signal was corrected for this noise. Outliers were most likely due to noise and therefore removed. Sensor values were positively associated with end-tidal CO(2), tidal volume and the pressure variables. The signal was corrected for changes in these ventilator variables after which the associations disappeared. Conclusion: Variations in humidity, ventilator disconnections, nebulization of medication and changes of ventilator settings indeed influenced exhaled breath signals measured in ventilated patients by continuous eNose analysis. We discussed several approaches to reduce the effects of these noise inducing variables. MDPI 2016-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5017501/ /pubmed/27556467 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16081337 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Leopold, Jan Hendrik
Abu-Hanna, Ameen
Colombo, Camilla
Sterk, Peter J.
Schultz, Marcus J.
Bos, Lieuwe D. J.
Factors Influencing Continuous Breath Signal in Intubated and Mechanically-Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients Measured by an Electronic Nose
title Factors Influencing Continuous Breath Signal in Intubated and Mechanically-Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients Measured by an Electronic Nose
title_full Factors Influencing Continuous Breath Signal in Intubated and Mechanically-Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients Measured by an Electronic Nose
title_fullStr Factors Influencing Continuous Breath Signal in Intubated and Mechanically-Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients Measured by an Electronic Nose
title_full_unstemmed Factors Influencing Continuous Breath Signal in Intubated and Mechanically-Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients Measured by an Electronic Nose
title_short Factors Influencing Continuous Breath Signal in Intubated and Mechanically-Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients Measured by an Electronic Nose
title_sort factors influencing continuous breath signal in intubated and mechanically-ventilated intensive care unit patients measured by an electronic nose
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556467
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16081337
work_keys_str_mv AT leopoldjanhendrik factorsinfluencingcontinuousbreathsignalinintubatedandmechanicallyventilatedintensivecareunitpatientsmeasuredbyanelectronicnose
AT abuhannaameen factorsinfluencingcontinuousbreathsignalinintubatedandmechanicallyventilatedintensivecareunitpatientsmeasuredbyanelectronicnose
AT colombocamilla factorsinfluencingcontinuousbreathsignalinintubatedandmechanicallyventilatedintensivecareunitpatientsmeasuredbyanelectronicnose
AT sterkpeterj factorsinfluencingcontinuousbreathsignalinintubatedandmechanicallyventilatedintensivecareunitpatientsmeasuredbyanelectronicnose
AT schultzmarcusj factorsinfluencingcontinuousbreathsignalinintubatedandmechanicallyventilatedintensivecareunitpatientsmeasuredbyanelectronicnose
AT boslieuwedj factorsinfluencingcontinuousbreathsignalinintubatedandmechanicallyventilatedintensivecareunitpatientsmeasuredbyanelectronicnose