Cargando…

Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength Among Hearing Aid Users

Even though hearing aid (HA) users can respond very differently to noise reduction (NR) processing, knowledge about possible drivers of this variability (and thus ways of addressing it in HA fittings) is sparse. The current study investigated differences in preferred NR strength among HA users. Part...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neher, Tobias, Wagener, Kirsten C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27604781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216516655794
_version_ 1782452772568825856
author Neher, Tobias
Wagener, Kirsten C.
author_facet Neher, Tobias
Wagener, Kirsten C.
author_sort Neher, Tobias
collection PubMed
description Even though hearing aid (HA) users can respond very differently to noise reduction (NR) processing, knowledge about possible drivers of this variability (and thus ways of addressing it in HA fittings) is sparse. The current study investigated differences in preferred NR strength among HA users. Participants were groups of experienced users with clear preferences (“NR lovers”; N = 14) or dislikes (“NR haters”; N = 13) for strong NR processing, as determined in two earlier studies. Maximally acceptable background noise levels, detection thresholds for speech distortions caused by NR processing, and self-reported “sound personality” traits were considered as candidate measures for explaining group membership. Participants also adjusted the strength of the (binaural coherence-based) NR algorithm to their preferred level. Consistent with previous findings, NR lovers favored stronger processing than NR haters, although there also was some overlap. While maximally acceptable noise levels and detection thresholds for speech distortions tended to be higher for NR lovers than for NR haters, group differences were only marginally significant. No clear group differences were observed in the self-report data. Taken together, these results indicate that preferred NR strength is an individual trait that is fairly stable across time and that is not easily captured by psychoacoustic, audiological, or self-report measures aimed at indexing susceptibility to background noise and processing artifacts. To achieve more personalized NR processing, an effective approach may be to let HA users determine the optimal setting themselves during the fitting process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5017568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50175682016-09-22 Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength Among Hearing Aid Users Neher, Tobias Wagener, Kirsten C. Trends Hear ISAAR Special Issue Even though hearing aid (HA) users can respond very differently to noise reduction (NR) processing, knowledge about possible drivers of this variability (and thus ways of addressing it in HA fittings) is sparse. The current study investigated differences in preferred NR strength among HA users. Participants were groups of experienced users with clear preferences (“NR lovers”; N = 14) or dislikes (“NR haters”; N = 13) for strong NR processing, as determined in two earlier studies. Maximally acceptable background noise levels, detection thresholds for speech distortions caused by NR processing, and self-reported “sound personality” traits were considered as candidate measures for explaining group membership. Participants also adjusted the strength of the (binaural coherence-based) NR algorithm to their preferred level. Consistent with previous findings, NR lovers favored stronger processing than NR haters, although there also was some overlap. While maximally acceptable noise levels and detection thresholds for speech distortions tended to be higher for NR lovers than for NR haters, group differences were only marginally significant. No clear group differences were observed in the self-report data. Taken together, these results indicate that preferred NR strength is an individual trait that is fairly stable across time and that is not easily captured by psychoacoustic, audiological, or self-report measures aimed at indexing susceptibility to background noise and processing artifacts. To achieve more personalized NR processing, an effective approach may be to let HA users determine the optimal setting themselves during the fitting process. SAGE Publications 2016-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5017568/ /pubmed/27604781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216516655794 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle ISAAR Special Issue
Neher, Tobias
Wagener, Kirsten C.
Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength Among Hearing Aid Users
title Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength Among Hearing Aid Users
title_full Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength Among Hearing Aid Users
title_fullStr Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength Among Hearing Aid Users
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength Among Hearing Aid Users
title_short Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength Among Hearing Aid Users
title_sort investigating differences in preferred noise reduction strength among hearing aid users
topic ISAAR Special Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5017568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27604781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216516655794
work_keys_str_mv AT nehertobias investigatingdifferencesinpreferrednoisereductionstrengthamonghearingaidusers
AT wagenerkirstenc investigatingdifferencesinpreferrednoisereductionstrengthamonghearingaidusers